Terror Strike In 6 Months?

[DamnYankee]

Americans expect Islamic terror strike within 6 months
Survey shows 65% confirm attack somewhat or very likely
Posted: November 19, 2009
8:58 pm Eastern

By Bob Unruh
© 2009 WorldNetDaily

Editor's note: This is another in a series of monthly "WND/WENZEL POLLS" - polls conducted exclusively for WND by the public opinion research and media consulting company Wenzel Strategies.

Two-thirds of Americans expect an Islamic suicide bomb attack on American soil within six months, according to a new poll that also shows Republicans are significantly more concerned than Democrats.

Fritz Wenzel of Wenzel Strategies said one of the most shocking findings of his recent polling on the subject was that 65 percent are expecting an attack within six months.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=116489

Out of fear of being branded by the allies of the moon god worshipers as rascist, US investigative authorities could have stopped Hasan. Will they be able to stop what 65% of Americans feel will happen in the near future?

Not if the moon god worshipers and their leftist allies can help it.

[DngrMse]

Since "due dilligence" is considered "racist", yes, we'll get hit, and after the fact we'll discover that it could have been easily prevented. Just like 9/11. Just like Hasan. /shrug

[flaming_liberal]

I guess it's been six months since the last "Do you think we're gonna be attacked in the next six months?" poll was conducted by WND. This has been going on since '01.

[DamnYankee]

I can think of at least 40 families who believe we were "hit" at Ft. Hood.

[Dogberry]

Has anyone there linked Fort Hood with the T word?

I havent seen it. Strange.

[flaming_liberal]

Originally Posted by DamnYankee

I can think of at least 40 families who believe we were "hit" at Ft. Hood.

We don't know if we were hit at Fort Hood. There was a mass shooting, but Hasan's motivations remain unclear. The closest answer seems to be a workplace shooting, not an act of terrorism. I know this might seem a little weird to accept that a Muslim could have killed people outside of an act of terrorism, but it's possible. Terrorism is the motivation. And unless you're saying they're

Nobody's denying that terrorist activities have still been going down. Scott Roeder's a terrorist. Whether to live in fear of terrorism or not is kinda dumb.

[cavemonk]

Were being attacked every single day fools, ..but not by Islam. There is only one Intelligence agency in the world and it works for the Vatican. Its different branches are called, the CIA, the KGB, the Mossad, ISI, MI6, etc etc, they all work under MI5 the ORIGINAL Intelligence agency. The CIA was created under direction of the Jesuits by Knights of Malta. All orders are controlled by the Jesuit order, The knights of Malta, Knights of Columbus, Knights of the order of the Bath, knights Hospitalliers, Knights of Eulogia(otherwise known as The order of the skull and bones) and they also control ALL of Freemasonry. They are the ones who plant the road side bombs, they brought down the towers, they brought down The Murrah building in Oklahoma City, they hit the WTC in 1993, they bombed the Cole and the Liberty, They bombed the Kobar Tower in '83. They control EVERY SINGLE country, INCLUDING China, North Korea, Cuba and Iran. They also control EVERY Channel on the dial. If you haven't researched the Vatican, and the Jesuits,, and the knights of Malta yet, you are flying blind.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWwrEEP8EBk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2vpcABWJiY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RBXerP0p3Q
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5V1uJoN6nY

Your ENTIRE LIVES ARE LIES!! And the lies are so deep you cant even tell. You will even dismiss it as impossible because they have you so thoroughly fooled and trained you. Every single thing on TV has been a lie since the day it was invented. It is what it was invented for.

[Dogberry]

Originally Posted by cavemonk

Were being attacked every single day fools, ..but not by Islam. There is only one Intelligence agency in the world and it works for the Vatican. Its different branches are called, the CIA, the KGB, the Mossad, ISI, MI6, etc etc, they all work under MI5 the ORIGINAL Intelligence agency. The CIA was created under direction of the Jesuits by Knights of Malta. All orders are controlled by the Jesuit order, The knights of Malta, Knights of Columbus, Knights of the order of the Bath, knights Hospitalliers, Knights of Eulogia(otherwise known as The order of the skull and bones) and they also control ALL of Freemasonry. They are the ones who plant the road side bombs, they brought down the towers, they brought down The Murrah building in Oklahoma City, they hit the WTC in 1993, they bombed the Cole and the Liberty, They bombed the Kobar Tower in '83. They control EVERY SINGLE country, INCLUDING China, North Korea, Cuba and Iran. They also control EVERY Channel on the dial. If you haven't researched the Vatican, and the Jesuits,, and the knights of Malta yet, you are flying blind.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWwrEEP8EBk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2vpcABWJiY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RBXerP0p3Q
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5V1uJoN6nY

Your ENTIRE LIVES ARE LIES!! And the lies are so deep you cant even tell. You will even dismiss it as impossible because they have you so thoroughly fooled and trained you. Every single thing on TV has been a lie since the day it was invented. It is what it was invented for.

Look up 'insane' in the dictionary

[big steve]

Originally Posted by Dogberry

Has anyone there linked Fort Hood with the T word?

I havent seen it. Strange.

Common sense citizens like some of us on here believe it was a terrorist act! We don't have to wait for an idiot president or his stooges to make it official!

[DngrMse]

Originally Posted by cavemonk

Were being attacked every single day fools, ..but not by Islam. There is only one Intelligence agency in the world and it works for the Vatican. Its different branches are called, the CIA, the KGB, the Mossad, ISI, MI6, etc etc, they all work under MI5 the ORIGINAL Intelligence agency. The CIA was created under direction of the Jesuits by Knights of Malta. All orders are controlled by the Jesuit order, The knights of Malta, Knights of Columbus, Knights of the order of the Bath, knights Hospitalliers, Knights of Eulogia(otherwise known as The order of the skull and bones) and they also control ALL of Freemasonry. They are the ones who plant the road side bombs, they brought down the towers, they brought down The Murrah building in Oklahoma City, they hit the WTC in 1993, they bombed the Cole and the Liberty, They bombed the Kobar Tower in '83. They control EVERY SINGLE country, INCLUDING China, North Korea, Cuba and Iran. They also control EVERY Channel on the dial. If you haven't researched the Vatican, and the Jesuits,, and the knights of Malta yet, you are flying blind.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWwrEEP8EBk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2vpcABWJiY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RBXerP0p3Q
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5V1uJoN6nY

Your ENTIRE LIVES ARE LIES!! And the lies are so deep you cant even tell. You will even dismiss it as impossible because they have you so thoroughly fooled and trained you. Every single thing on TV has been a lie since the day it was invented. It is what it was invented for.

How is it they're allowing you to post this?

[DngrMse]

Originally Posted by flaming_liberal

We don't know if we were hit at Fort Hood. There was a mass shooting, but Hasan's motivations remain unclear. The closest answer seems to be a workplace shooting, not an act of terrorism. I know this might seem a little weird to accept that a Muslim could have killed people outside of an act of terrorism, but it's possible. Terrorism is the motivation. And unless you're saying they're

Nobody's denying that terrorist activities have still been going down. Scott Roeder's a terrorist. Whether to live in fear of terrorism or not is kinda dumb.

His motivations might be unclear, (something I don't agree with...I believe his motivations were quite clear), but his methods were'nt. He used terror as his vehicle of choice.

[flaming_liberal]

Originally Posted by big steve

Common sense citizens like some of us on here believe it was a terrorist act! We don't have to wait for an idiot president or his stooges to make it official!

Does your common sense tell you that dude having all the hallmarks of an unhinged, angry employee engaging in a workplace shooting dictate that he must be a terrorist? Or that he's a whacko? Mass murder is not always terrorism.
On the other hand, he very well could be a terrorist. I'd rather wait until we know for sure before we start jumping to conclusions.

Anyway, why are we waiting for Muslim terrorists to strike as the sign? We have white Christian terrorists attacking and murdering folks as they leave their churches.

[flaming_liberal]

Originally Posted by DngrMse

His motivations might be unclear, (something I don't agree with...I believe his motivations were quite clear), but his methods were'nt. He used terror as his vehicle of choice.

Really, he was terrorizing? People living in constant fear of another attack and reprisal beyond the expected psychological reaction to such a terrible tragedy?
His plan was suicidal. He apparently acted alone (indicating no fear of reprisal or group to repeat such a plot). And his goal was to kill people, as far as anyone knows. Not terrorize.

But that being said, I'm not arguing that terrorist activities haven't occurred. I keep repeating the church step shoot out. It's spurious to name things as terrorist activities when the jury's still out. Judgment comes at the end of the trial--after all the facts have been presented--not at the beginning.

[Java_man]

Originally Posted by Dogberry

Has anyone there linked Fort Hood with the T word?

I havent seen it. Strange.

The FOX news pundits and the far right blogs have , some of the rightwing socks here also

Its mass murder unless the murderer is a raghead .. then its "Terror" and that automatically makes the dead, 10 times more dead

[DngrMse]

Originally Posted by Java_man

The FOX news pundits and the far right blogs have , some of the rightwing socks here also

Its mass murder unless the murderer is a raghead .. then its "Terror" and that automatically makes the dead, 10 times more dead

The leftwing 'socks' here seem strangely insistent in calling this something other than terror, as do the far left blogs, and news channels. Somehow, according to what passes for logical thought in their circles, if it's just murder, then it's not that big a deal....the victims are ten times less dead that way.

I can't help suspect that this is all politically motivated. Almost as if this would be a(nother) black eye for the O administration.

[flaming_liberal]

Originally Posted by DngrMse

The leftwing 'socks' here seem strangely insistent in calling this something other than terror, as do the far left blogs, and news channels. Somehow, according to what passes for logical thought in their circles, if it's just murder, then it's not that big a deal....the victims are ten times less dead that way.

I can't help suspect that this is all politically motivated. Almost as if this would be a(nother) black eye for the O administration.

The reality is that nobody really knows. His lack of associates or any first hand information on his motivation prevent anything but far reaching speculation as to the motivation. Let's get all the facts before we start making conclusions. Either way it's a terrible tragedy.

[Java_man]

Originally Posted by DngrMse

The leftwing 'socks' here seem strangely insistent in calling this something other than terror, as do the far left blogs, and news channels. Somehow, according to what passes for logical thought in their circles, if it's just murder, then it's not that big a deal....the victims are ten times less dead that way.

I can't help suspect that this is all politically motivated. Almost as if this would be a(nother) black eye for the O administration.

Other than the religion of the shooter, there is no evidence it was "terror"

You guys just don't sleep well unless there is a islamic terror bogey man under your bed .. do you ?

Killeen TX was also the sight of another murderous rampage in '91 .. when George Hennard Jr shot up a restaurant full of patrons .. with the new FOX definition that should have been a "terror attack" as well

[DamnYankee]

Let's see. A moon god worshiper plans on killing numerous people. He walks among numerous people and kills them while yelling out allah akbar, "moon god is great," but the leftists still refuse to knowledge that such an act is terrorism.

This is why we fail.

This is why the intelligent services were frightened to call a spade, a spade. They were afraid they would be branded a racist by the kook left. They could have stopped this terrorist in his tracks.

[Forthright]

President Obama (and Leftists need to throw their) “Muslims-can-do-no-evil” rose-colored glasses off and see the real world.

After listening to (and reading) remarks by Barack Hussein Obama (and the leftists on this forum) concerning Fort Hood, Texas, (we see they) refuse to understand the gravity of the events and the underlying reasons that led to this terrorist attack on America’s valiant soldiers.

To Obama (and Leftists), terrorism and Islamist jihad are words stricken from presidential and (Leftist) lexicon. Without these words, one cannot adequately understand these brutal events on America’s homeland. Jihad flows from very specific Islamic teachings. This attack was a premeditated act of unspeakable terrorism, including the ritual pre-jihad (pre-attack) cleansing routine caught in part on convenience store cameras. Politically correct denial of Islam’s role in this bloodletting is foolish and dangerous.

What is the evidence to substantiate our claims?

The FBI knew that Fort Hood shooter Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan had communicated with a radical, extremist imam nearly a year before the attack. Yet, the FBI wrongly determined that the Army officer was no threat. Why was he categorized as no threat? What official or officials cleared him? For what reason did they clear him?

We have learned from Rep. Pete Hoekstra of Michigan, the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, that the Obama administration knew months ago that Hasan and the radical Yemeni imam had exchanged 10 to 20 e-mail messages.

The imam influencing the Muslim shooter is Anwar al-Awlaki, who was released from a jail in Yemen last year. Al-Awlaki writes an anti-American blog that repeatedly denounces the war on terror. He presided at the mosque in Falls Church, Va., that Hasan attended, a center known for radical Islamic teaching.

http://www.chronwatch-america.com/ar...ses/Page1.html

[flaming_liberal]

Post Hoc, ergo propter hoc.
Ass/u/me.
Speculation is speculative.

Any of these ringing a bell?

Let's not use labels when we don't possess the full facts. That's how bad things happen. Aren't yall the same group who got on someone's ass for saying we don't need trials to know if someone is guilty?