As part of a DOJ effort to prosecute them, sure. It's not as if the Mexican mob wasn't going to kill them anyways
The EP claim made by the President is unrelated to the deliberative process claim. One states that the documents are protected from subpeona as DOJ work product; the other invokes national security concerns and presidential involvement.
The work product defense is highly legally controversial, while the EP claim is not, as it was clarified by a SCOTUS decision.
And if you don't mind...you seem awfully cavalier about the deaths of innocent people.
How do you manage to look yourself in the mirror each morning? Is protecting Obama worth so many dead children? Is there an upper limit to the number of dead bodies at all?
Kind of funny, considering he won a nobel peace prize...for being half black, then plays an instrumental role in seeing little kids gunned down with weapons he transferred to the murderers that pulled the trigger. Hope and Change? Transparency? And you want to give that man another four years?
But heck...you don't seem particularly interested in getting to the bottom of this. Like TT, (self professed bigot), this is a 'bogus scandal'?
I've never encountered someone who lies as much as you do. Lies just flow out of you so easily it's just creepy. Indeed, how do you look at yourself in the mirror everyday? You're just such a disgusting human being. Tell me, what has Obama done for you to make you say things and lie the way you do all along tearing away at any shred of credibility or character that you once possessed? Is it really worth it? You've become a laughing stock at this website and have a reputation as a serial liar. Hope it's worth it.
So what is Holder trying to keep secret?
Holder asked Obama to invoke executive privilege over documents having to do with "the Department's deliberative process concerning how to respond to congressional and related media inquiries into that operation." In other words, Holder is saying the documents don't deal with the government's actual response to Fast and Furious.
The letter doesn't explicitly mention presidential communications. So, contrary to a few Republican congressmen's claims, the communications could be just between Justice Department officials and not include anybody at the White House itself.
Originally Posted by Cyclown Ranger
More of your stupid character assassination and lies.
If they didn't have the ATF's weapons to kill with, they simply would have used domestic weapons. It's rather hard to believe gangs of sociopathic organized drug rings would have refrained from killing unless they had American weapons to do so.
Not at all. That's why I applaud the DOJ's efforts to put them out of business, including F&F.And if you don't mind...you seem awfully cavalier about the deaths of innocent people.
You're full of it.How do you manage to look yourself in the mirror each morning? Is protecting Obama worth so many dead children? Is there an upper limit to the number of dead bodies at all?
Those children are dying because the Mexican cartels remain operational, not Obama, dumbass. They will continue dying as long as the Mexican gangs stay in business, and their deaths had bupkis to do with F&F
Undercover operations like F&F are the only measures capabable of bringing down the cartels, with the possible (and highly unlikely) exception of declaring war on our Mexican neighbors.
Last edited by Cyclone Ranger; 08-04-2012 at 02:24 PM.
You're done. PB kicked your ass again.
When will the world learn that a million men are of no importance compared with one man? [Henry David Thoreau]
I'm right, and he's wrong.
That's why he had to resort to name-calling to save face.
When I asked in the opening post: "where's the outrage?" the deafening silence from the Obama-luvin'-tools has answered the question....There is no outrage because part of the libtard religion is to protect your god's at all costs. They cannot defend the indefensible so there tactic here is to remain silent and wait for the flames to die down.
Strange that Cowpunk_6.5 didn't get the "keep it chill" memo and instead opted for the duck-dodge-deflect defense. He must not be getting his emails from HQ since he has changed ID's
Scandal? The government dispatched more firepower to arrest Nakoula Basseley Nakoula in Los Angeles than it did to protect its mission in Benghazi.
I'm not Cowpunk.
And, no one has built a compelling case for outrage, simply because the DOJ was doing its job, going after bad guys.
I resorted to name calling Cowpunk, because you're a filthy, lying, dishonest POS who after have been shown to be a liar with supporting documentation, follows it up with "Im right and he's wrong", another lie....That's why he had to resort to name-calling to save face.
If I'm wrong, prove it. Prove the "evidence" I've provided is wrong. We'll be waiting.....
Originally Posted by Cyclown Ranger
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)