Maybe because this day and age any body with a computer, the right skill set and some time on his hads can do about anything they want with a video?
We all remember the Zapruder films being edited by intelligence agencies right? I suppose that was one of the first times the Feds felt they needed to make sure the masses did not know the truth as revealed on video. What are more recent events that reduce freedom but are controversial since the feds DO NOT release video evidence to the public?
Maybe because this day and age any body with a computer, the right skill set and some time on his hads can do about anything they want with a video?
Annoy a leftist: Think logically.
Maybe because now, what our elected officials say, is preserved forever on youtube, etc.
Their lies are there for all to see.
In the case of the Pentagon missile attack that the government says was a plane, the video footage has been classified. What is bizarre is that in government prisons, they do not have video cameras like they do at 7/11 and just about EVERY retail store. I guess the lawyers need more taxpayer money playing with the results of criminal activity in prisons rather than finding truth.
Except it wasn't a missle strike and in fact based on the evidence at the scene could not have been.
Annoy a leftist: Think logically.
There is no way a plane flown by boxcutter hijackers hit the Pentagon!. And here is video of the military plane that hit the WTC!
What a laugh. Where did you find these loons. There is nothing there but a shadow.
Annoy a leftist: Think logically.
That is the point! WHERE IS THE VIDEO OF A PLANE HITTING THE PENTAGON!
There is actually a video from a pentagram security camera that shows the plane hitting the pentagram.
There were many security cameras that filmed it. Why did Dick Cheney only release that one Zaprudered flucking thing?
It wan't a video it is from a security camera set to take photos individual photos of pedestrian traffic around the Pentagon. It takes like one photo every 3 or 4 seconds. Great if your photographing foot traffic sucks if you are taking a picture of a plane flying at 500 - 600 miles an hour. Very few of them were aimed in the approriate direction. And among the rest the angle was sufficient that at 500+ miles an hour you are through the coverage area in the 3 or 4 second lapse between photos.
There do exist shit loads of photos of people wondering around the Pentagon grounds after the impact picking up enough pieces of aluminum to make about 10 of any currently know US military missle not an ICBM.
Annoy a leftist: Think logically.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks