+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 40

Thread: Is Putin the greatest leader of our time?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 03 2007
    Location
    In a computer near you.
    Posts
    2,822

    Is Putin the greatest leader of our time?

    http://thebilzerianreport.com/?p=907


    Many Westerners have a negative view of Russia’s President, Vladimir Putin, because of the unjust portrayal he receives in the Western media. If one were to believe everything they saw in the American media, they would probably think Putin to be a ruthless dictator who was anointed by birth rather than a politician born into a working class family with approval ratings higher than all of his Western counterparts.

    Under Putin’s eight-year reign the Russian economy grew every single year, with an overall GDP increase of more than 70%. During the same period, investments rose 125%, industry grew by 76%, and poverty decreased 50%. The average monthly salaries in Russia increased from $80 to $640, and the middle class grew from 8 million people to 55 million.

    Analysts have credited these impressive economic achievements to strong macro-management, capital inflows, fiscal policy reform, and rising energy prices (Russia is a large exporter of oil and gas).*Putin wisely reintroduced nuclear power and positioned Russia as an energy super power that Europe has come to rely on. He also invested heavily in Russian infrastructure, including pipelines. Among Putin’s accomplishments was the introduction of a 13% flat tax and the reduction of the corporate tax rate from 35% to 24%. As a result, Putin has maintained extraordinarily high approval ratings from the Russian people, winning his second Presidency with 71% of the vote.

    Putin’s accomplishments are even more impressive when one realizes that he has had to deal with one of the fiercest mafias in the world. The Jewish Russian mafia led by notorious billionaire gangsters like Boris Berezovsky, Mikhail Khordokovsky, and Vladimir Gusinsky are responsible for sex slavery, weapons trafficking, drug running, and the rampant*corruption that has plagued Russia since the fall of the Soviet Union. Putin has consistently risked his life to challenge these gangsters and eventually saw charges brought against all of the above listed oligarchs. Regardless of these challenges, Putin’s administration has consistently maintained a lower incarceration rate than the*United States.

    The US media routinely questions the integrity of the Russian election process and even mocked Russia for calling the last presidential election with only 25% of vote in; all while CNN and Fox have been calling Republican Primary elections with only 1% of the vote being counted. There is little to no proof that Putin has ever committed election fraud, but there is significant evidence that the American Republican Party has committed more documented cases of voter fraud against Ron Paul than Russia could dream of, as the following article proves: *http://thebilzerianreport.com/?p=777.

    While Obama was winning a Nobel Peace Prize and perpetrating undeclared wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Putin was using every piece of his influence to oppose unjust and internationally illegal wars. In 2003, Western powers used their political influence to invade Iraq, with no credible intelligence of weapons of mass destruction. The war eventually lead to higher oil prices and the murder of one million innocent civilians. Cooler heads in the United Nations like Vladimir’s Russia staunchly opposed the war and doubted the dubious intelligence from his rival leaders. Putin tried to prevent the disastrous Iraq war by vetoing resolutions in the UN, but the powerful Israeli-American lobby, AIPAC, forced America into war without UN backing.

    Just as in Iraq, Putin staunchly opposed the intervention in Libya, which has also turned out to be a humanitarian disaster. Libya went from an internationally law-abiding country to a fractionalized nation that is being controlled by radical elements. The country’s infrastructure was seriously damaged, and far greater human rights abuses are being perpetrated now than ever took place under Gaddafi.

    Now the American-Israeli lobby and non-gentile American groups in the US, like the mainstream media, are pushing for more undeclared wars in Syria and Iran. Both of which would increase the price of oil tremendously and likely lead to the downfall of the already frail world economy. Even though such an event would increase the price of Russia’s main export, oil, Putin seems to care more about the humanitarian implications of such an intervention than the financial benefits for his nation. As such, Putin used Russia’s seat on the UN security council to veto US backed resolutions on Syria. The blood thirsty American media immediately condemned Putin as being obstructionist and starting a second cold war, but Putin remained above the petty warmongering and simply instructed the Americans to stop attempting to indulge in their “bellicose itch” to start more wars.

    Putin’s business acumen, just foreign policy decisions, and humanitarian leadership should be congratulated throughout the world. If only American Presidents could respect freedom and other nations’ sovereignty like Vladimir Putin, the planet would be a lot more peaceful.
    Last edited by Going Postal; 04-13-2012 at 12:46 AM.
    I Pledge Resistance, to the Nazi Flag, of the United Police States of America, and to the Private Federal Reserves for which it stands. One Corporation, under Goldman Sachs, unaccountable, with poverty and slavery for all.


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 21 2007
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    2,533
    I suppose if Putin is so great he would have tacked corruption -that most terrible aspect of Russia today? Oh, wait:

    Annual Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) results:

    2011
    Brazil: 3.8 (change from 1996: +0.9)
    Russia: 2.4 (change from 1996: -0.1)
    India: 3.1 (change from 1996: +0.5)
    China: 3.6 (change from 1996: +1.2)
    South Africa: 4.1 (change from 1996: -1.5)

    2010
    Brazil: 3.7
    Russia: 2.1
    India: 3.3
    China: 3.5
    South Africa: 4.5

    2009
    Brazil: 3.7
    Russia: 2.2
    India: 3.4
    China: 3.6
    South Africa: 3.7

    2008
    Brazil: 3.5
    Russia: 2.1
    India: 3.4
    China: 3.6
    South Africa: 4.9

    2007
    Brazil: 3.5
    Russia: 2.3
    India: 3.5
    China: 3.5
    South Africa: 5.1

    2006
    Brazil: 3.3
    Russia: 2.5
    India: 3.3
    China: 3.3
    South Africa: 4.6

    2005
    Brazil: 3.7
    Russia: 2.4
    India: 2.9
    China: 3.2
    South Africa: 4.5

    2004
    Brazil: 3.9
    Russia: 2.8
    India 2.8
    China: 3.4
    South Africa: 4.6

    2003
    Brazil: 3.9
    Russia: 2.7
    India: 2.7
    China: 3.4
    South Africa: 4.4

    2002
    Brazil: 4.0
    Russia: 2.7
    India: 2.7
    China: 3.5
    South Africa: 4.8

    2001
    Brazil: 4.0
    Russia: 2.3
    India: 2.7
    China: 3.5
    South Africa: 4.8

    2000
    Brazil: 3.9
    Russia: 2.1
    India: 2.8
    China: 3.1
    South Africa: 5.0

    1999
    Brazil: 4.1
    Russia: 2.4
    India: 2.9
    China: 3.4
    South Africa: 5.0

    1998
    Brazil: 4.0
    Russia: 2.4
    India: 2.9
    China: 3.5
    South Africa: 5.2

    1997
    Brazil: 3.5
    Russia: 2.2
    India: 2.7
    China: 2.8
    South Africa: 4.9

    1996
    Brazil: 2.9
    Russia: 2.5
    India: 2.6
    China: 2.4
    South Africa: 5.6
    Show us not the aim without the way, for ends and means on earth are so entangled
    That changing one, you change the other too; each different path brings other ends in view

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Archaix For This Useful Post:

    GanjaFreebird (04-13-2012)

  4. #3
    Join Date
    May 23 2001
    Location
    Long Island Sound
    Posts
    41,589
    Is a low number better than a higher number? It says the USA is 7.1! Not sure if that is better or worse, but we all know the USA is corrupt as any third world country.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 21 2007
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    2,533
    Higher the number = better.
    Show us not the aim without the way, for ends and means on earth are so entangled
    That changing one, you change the other too; each different path brings other ends in view

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Archaix For This Useful Post:

    Šñøü†ê® (04-13-2012)

  7. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 03 2007
    Location
    In a computer near you.
    Posts
    2,822
    Why Putin is Under Attack

    Because of the ongoing escalation of anti-Russian rhetoric both by the American press and President Bush, I have undertaken a short trip to Moscow to interview Russian leaders in an effort to gain a deeper understanding of the real policies of Russian President Vladimir Putin. I plan to write about this issue extensively and incorporate some of the research into my next book. Over the past few days I have met with members of the Duma, some nationalist newspaper editors, and some leaders of the Russian anti-globalist, nationalist community. I even put on my journalist cap and interviewed some of the Jewish publishers! Here is my personal analysis of the conflict that looms between the Anglo-American-Israel Axis and Putin’s Russia.

    President Vladimir Putin is no perfect man. He reached his political coming of age in the shadowy intelligence services of the old Soviet Union. In that milieu he learned the highest arts of any spy; subterfuge and camouflage. But in truth, the talents of deceit are honed to a much higher degree in the American political system than in any autocratic nation. In a nation where the government has some influence over media rather than being at the mercy of the unelected, self-appointed media elite, the public official can speak somewhat frankly.

    Contrarily, a politician in the United States or Britain must be careful never to speak his mind honestly or he might find himself eviscerated by media which are always on the lookout for the slightest political incorrectness.

    The Anglo-American politician must be judiciously careful not to say anything that could even be remotely construed as criticizing even the lowest echelons of Jewish power. For instance, look at the huge flap in London right now over the comments of the Mayor of London, Ken Livingstone, to an obnoxious Jewish reporter who was hounding him. For simply retorting to the reporter that he was acting like a concentration camp guard you would have thought Livingstone to be a friend of Hitler. The Jewish Board of Deputies and a score of Jewish columnists accused him of denying the realities of Jewish suffering and trivializing the Holocaust - all for simply criticizing a single Jewish reporter. Now they threaten to actually remove this man who was elected by the overwhelming majority of Londoners because of his trivial statement.

    Of course one must understand, a Jewish reporter is in effect the enforcer of political correctness. He is the policeman and inquisitor of Jewish supremacism. To criticize one of them is equated in the minds of the media to assaulting a member of the police, the thought police.

    Putin has committed a far greater crime in the minds of the Jewish media. He is Russian. A real Russian. Although he came to power with back door political manipulation and with the aid of some Jewish allies, underneath he has always had a Russian soul waiting for the chance to assert itself.

    So he played the game. In some ways Stalin was his model. Although Stalin fit comfortably into the Jewish milieu of the early Bolshevik revolution with his Jewish wife and many Jewish friends, Stalin was Georgian and he always knew that he could never fit in with the coterie of Jews who upon Lenin’s death circled like vultures around the Russian throne of power. Trotsky, Radek, Kamenov Sverdlov, they were all of the Hebrew cut. They never saw Stalin coming, after all, what could this one lone goy among them do to challenge them? When they finally saw the true face of this utterly ruthless man, it was too late.

    The story is now legend, As the Jewish Bolsheviks fought it out ferociously among themselves for power, with Trotsky (Bronstein) as the leading contender, and since Stalin wasn’t Jewish he was the one they felt was no real threat so that they could give some reins of police power. In fact, Stalin helped them literally eliminate each other and he ultimately emerged as the strong man. The purges of the 1920s and 30s eliminated many of the Jewish cliques that dominated the Bolshevik government. Stalin was careful not to completely purge all the Jews from the government and many powerful Jews remained in very important posts, one of the most prominent being Lazar Kaganovich. But Stalin began a policy of re-Russifying the Russian government, after all, he knew the war could not be fought and won without rekindling the Russian patriotic spirit. But he always kept at hand compliant Jews so that the world-wide Jewish love affair with the Soviet State would not be severed.

    Some powerful and perceptive Jews in the United States saw the sea change occurring in Russia, and a process began that has ultimately culminated in the very weird reality of former Trotskyite communists, the neocons becoming the dominators of the American conservative movement! The one thing that mitigated early overseas Jewish opposition to Stalin was that they needed Stalin and Russia if they were to overcome what they considered the greatest threat to Jewish supremacism: National Socialist Germany.

    The Bolsheviks had installed the Internationale as the national anthem. Stalin replaced it with an old Russian hymn. Advancement once again became based mostly on abilities and not Jewish tribal loyalties and connections. Russians rapidly advanced and occupied the leading the positions in the military and other government structures and by the end of the war the bulk of the Jewish power, although still far greater than their population percentage, was greatly diminished. Russians were motivated by appeals to protect Mother Russia rather than international worker solidarity. However, Russia was still crippled and saddled by the inept and corrupt system of Jewish communism, and although some improvements in Russian life occurred, this Marxist, flawed economic system could never give the Russian people either real freedom or prosperity.

    Most mainstream Jewish sources now claim that Stalin planned a "final solution" to the Russian Jewish problem by the resettlement of the Jews into a their own republic, much like the Czarist Pale of Settlement created in earlier centuries. The same Jewish authorities actually boast in the idea, whether real or fanciful, that Stalin’s Jewish doctors along with Lazar Kaganovich murdered Stalin on the very eve of his new pogrom. Kaganovich himself claimed to his nephew that he and his sister Rosa, a doctor, poisoned Stalin by switching Stalin’s pills with ones that would cause a stroke. (From which he died)

    When the Gentile communist Nikita Khruschev accused Kaganovich in 1957 at a Soviet Party Congress of having murdered 20 million Russians during his career, Kaganovich didn’t even deny it. He only accused Khruschev of being a murderer too. "Your hands are blood-stained too", Kaganovich told him. Khruschev pointed out that the difference was that he, Khruschev, had merely followed Kaganovich’s orders, while it had been Kaganovich who had formulated the policies of mass murder and had given the orders for carrying out those policies.

    It is impossible that Vladimir Putin is not aware of all these things. Every knowledgeable Russian is aware of them. And with the fall of Communism and the new state that emerged, Jews reasserted their power as they not had since the time of Lenin and Trotsky. In the two years following the fall of the Soviet State, through international Jewish capital and massive bribery, threats, murder and gangsterism, Jews seized control of most of wealth of Russia in undoubtedly the greatest series of criminal thefts in the history of mankind.

    The Jewish Oligarchs (10 of 11 of the most powerful were Jews) grabbed control of at least 65 percent of the wealth of Russia. The most politically active of the leading oligarchs was a vicious gangster and murderer named Boris Berezovsky. At one point Putin aligned with him in his quest for power. There was even an article in the Moscow Times newspaper about how Putin used to vacation in Berezovsky’s summer house in Spain.

    Berezovsky had risen under Boris Yeltsin as the head of National Security for Russia. But, a firestorm of justified anger broke out in Russia against him when it was learned that Berezovsky, the head of Russian security was also a citizen of Israel.

    As Putin gained more and more power in the Russian hierarchy he began to assert himself and eventually broke with Berezovsky and Gusinsky and a number of the Jewish Oligarchs. Since that time their have been thousands of sympathetic articles about Berezovsky and Gusinsky and articles about the lawlessness of Putin for daring to prosecute these men. Recently, Berezovsky’s biggest critic was gunned down on the streets of Moscow. Now this is the kind of man that the Jewish-dominated media loves!

    Putin has not acted against all of the Oligarchs. He was too much of a cold war chess player to do that, but he went against any of them who tried to assert power over him, much like Stalin did decades earlier. Berezovsky and Gusinsky (the gangster Gusinsky who was head of the Russian Jewish Congress) are now Putin’s most bitter enemies. No other leader in the western world would dare to go after such powerful Jewish supremacist.

    The latest case is that of Michael Khodorkovsky of Yukos Oil. Through graft and corruption Khodorkovsky obtained billions of dollars of oil leases for a pittance in the mid-nineties. But as he amassed his incredible wealth he decided he had the right to determine the political fate of Russia. In fact, he had the chutzpah to boast of that fact he will buy the Russian Duma. Putin, feeling threatened, and rightfully so, questioned why a man who stole billions of dollars from the Russian people then would have the right to corrupt government the same way as he obtained his oil leases. Khodorkovsky and almost all of the principle stockholders of Yukos are not only Jews but are in fact Israeli citizens, and many of the major stockholders (criminals) are now hiding out in Israel with the blessing of the Israeli government.

    Putin and his government initiated prosecutions of these Jewish supremacist gangsters that have committed the worst thievery in history.

    The reaction from the Jewish-dominated press in America and around the world is quite predictable. There has been a crescendo of criticism of Putin and universal defense of the "persecuted" Jewish oligarchs. Putin has even been accused of "anti-Semitism" for prosecuting these criminals.

    Because Putin believes that the Russian people should own the press rather than citizens of Israel, he is called an enemy of a free press. Yet, how can any press be free when it is controlled by a people who view themselves more Jewish than Russian and have their own clear international agenda? And today, as Bush calls for Russia to have a free press (translated: the Jewish criminal oligarchs such as Jewish mafia leader Berezovsky should control the press) they call on Russia to pass laws and prosecute Russians who dare to simply criticize the Jewish criminal oligarchs and the their allegiances to Israel and Jewish supremacism rather than to Russia and Russians.

    Bush has even had the hypocrisy to criticize Putin for consolidating Russian federal power. In America the federal government literally spends one thousand times more money on the federal government than does Russia. As shocking as that might sound for most Americans to read, it is fact. America spends about 4 trillion on government; Russia spends less than 40 billion! And Bush has the chutzpah to talk about consolidation of power in Russia!

    The American government has become the epitome of everything we once opposed. Russia is not communist any more, but the American government, under the domination of the Jewish neocons (who are former communists) acts more and more like the communists have acted for decades.

    Bush criticizes Putin and Russian freedom while he works to take away American constitutional freedoms with the Patriot Act.

    While the political mafia that controls America kept opposition candidates such as Ralph Nader off many state ballots, Russia had over 20 different parties on the ballot in their National elections.

    In America where only two parties control almost the entire political landscape and there’s hardly a dime’s worth of difference, (such as on the Iraq War) Russia is represented by many parties in their Duma with a wide range of political philosophies and opinions.

    Russians of every possible political opinion have representation in the Duma (Congress) while tens of millions of Americans have no voice at all in government for their political opinions. It is precisely why the American founding fathers rebelled against Britain: taxation without representation!

    And in the midst of this concerted attack on Putin and Russia, where is the opposition to the still existent, extremely dangerous, still communist nation of China? Patrick Buchanan put it very well in a recent article:

    "Why are McCain and Lieberman bullyragging Russia but not China? After all, Putin was elected, but Hu Jintao was not. Russia has an elected legislature with opposition parties. China has never held a free election. The Russian people have freedom of religion. China persecutes Christians. Russia threatens no U.S. ally. China threatens Taiwan. In a recent issue of Parade, a list was drawn up of the world’s 10 worst dictators based on their human rights violations. Hu Jintao was fourth from the top. Putin was not even mentioned."

    There is only one reason for the attacks upon Putin and Russia. Putin and the Russian people dare to defend themselves from the powers of Jewish supremacism. The oligarchs and the Zionists want total supremacy over the Russian nation, and that’s why they have made Putin a target. Their puppet George Bush, just as in the Iraq war, is happy to serve these masters of the American political landscape. It is not just leaders of AIPAC that are being investigated for spying who should wear the yellow coat of treason, George Bush has surrendered his presidency completely to this foreign power and shames every real American who has pride in our country.

    The truth is that Putin in attempting to defend Russia from the power of the Jewish supremacists - is in effect, defending all Americans, and all people everywhere who cherish their freedom and heritage. He is Russian rather than American, but his heritage is far closer to the American people and our interests than the Jewish supremacist misanthropists.

    The biggest roadblock to the New World Order and a sublimation of America and Europe to Jewish-supremacist globalism is Vladimir Putin .

    As important a figure Putin is for every freedom-loving Russian, he is just as important to those who love freedom in the United States of America, in Britain and all over the European world.
    I Pledge Resistance, to the Nazi Flag, of the United Police States of America, and to the Private Federal Reserves for which it stands. One Corporation, under Goldman Sachs, unaccountable, with poverty and slavery for all.


  8. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 02 2002
    Location
    Chicago
    Age
    41
    Posts
    15,790
    I bet Putin could kick Obama's ass in arm-wrestling too.
    "A Liberal is a person who will give away everything they don't own."

  9. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 17 2003
    Location
    Hollywood
    Age
    28
    Posts
    20,857
    Putin IS a very strong leader with TOO much fuckin' power, and this is exactly why he's dangerous, as he's bad for the world in the long run. It would be nice if his people got rid of him, somehow.

  10. #8
    Join Date
    May 23 2001
    Location
    Long Island Sound
    Posts
    41,589
    Quote Originally Posted by GanjaFreebird View Post
    Putin IS a very strong leader with TOO much fuckin' power, and this is exactly why he's dangerous, as he's bad for the world in the long run. It would be nice if his people got rid of him, somehow.
    Who are you to judge democratically elected individuals simply because they stand against the NWO?

  11. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 17 2003
    Location
    Hollywood
    Age
    28
    Posts
    20,857
    I'm just another person with an opinion, just like you are, and I can judge anybody I want to judge, especially a piece of shit dictator, however I'm not his problem, his own people are, and let's hope the drunk assholes are planning a commie revolution against him, that would be nice indeed!

  12. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 21 2007
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    2,533
    Did anyone else find Going Postal's second article heavily anti-semitic?
    Show us not the aim without the way, for ends and means on earth are so entangled
    That changing one, you change the other too; each different path brings other ends in view

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Archaix For This Useful Post:

    GanjaFreebird (04-13-2012)

  14. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 03 2007
    Location
    In a computer near you.
    Posts
    2,822
    Quote Originally Posted by Archaix View Post
    Did anyone else find Going Postal's second article heavily anti-semitic?
    I can't help it if the corrupt ogliarches are Jewish. You the one posted about the corruption; I showed you why.
    I Pledge Resistance, to the Nazi Flag, of the United Police States of America, and to the Private Federal Reserves for which it stands. One Corporation, under Goldman Sachs, unaccountable, with poverty and slavery for all.


  15. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 17 2003
    Location
    Hollywood
    Age
    28
    Posts
    20,857
    Quote Originally Posted by Archaix View Post
    Did anyone else find Going Postal's second article heavily anti-semitic?
    Of course, but he isn't a big fan of non-White people, we already know that.

  16. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 17 2003
    Location
    Hollywood
    Age
    28
    Posts
    20,857
    Quote Originally Posted by Going Postal View Post
    I can't help it if the corrupt ogliarches are Jewish. You the one posted about the corruption; I showed you why.
    THE JOOOOZZZ!!

    Thanks, Mel Gibson.

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to GanjaFreebird For This Useful Post:

    Archaix (04-13-2012)

  18. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 03 2007
    Location
    In a computer near you.
    Posts
    2,822
    Quote Originally Posted by GanjaFreebird View Post
    Putin IS a very strong leader with TOO much fuckin' power, and this is exactly why he's dangerous, as he's bad for the world in the long run. It would be nice if his people got rid of him, somehow.
    From wiki:
    According to public opinion surveys conducted by NGO*Levada Center, Putin's approval rating was 81% in June 2007, and the highest of any leader in the world.[229] His popularity rose from 31% in August 1999 to 80% in November 1999 and since then it has never fallen below 65% during his Presidency.[230] Observers see Putin's high approval ratings as a consequence of the significant improvements in living standards and Russia's reassertion of itself on the world scene that occurred during his tenure as President.[231][232][dead link] One analysis attributed Putin's popularity, in part, to state-owned or state-controlled television.[233]
    A joint poll by World Public Opinion in the US and Levada Center*[234] in Russia around June–July 2006 stated that "neither the Russian nor the American publics are convinced Russia is headed in an anti-democratic direction" and "Russians generally support Putin's concentration of political power and strongly support the re-nationalization of Russia's oil and gas industry." Russians generally support the political course of Putin and his team.[235] A 2005 survey showed that three times as many Russians felt the country was "more democratic" under Putin than it was during the Yeltsin or Gorbachev years, and the same proportion thought human rights were better under Putin than Yeltsin.[233]
    I Pledge Resistance, to the Nazi Flag, of the United Police States of America, and to the Private Federal Reserves for which it stands. One Corporation, under Goldman Sachs, unaccountable, with poverty and slavery for all.


  19. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 17 2003
    Location
    Hollywood
    Age
    28
    Posts
    20,857
    Quote Originally Posted by Going Postal View Post
    From wiki:
    According to public opinion surveys conducted by NGO*Levada Center, Putin's approval rating was 81% in June 2007, and the highest of any leader in the world.[229] His popularity rose from 31% in August 1999 to 80% in November 1999 and since then it has never fallen below 65% during his Presidency.[230] Observers see Putin's high approval ratings as a consequence of the significant improvements in living standards and Russia's reassertion of itself on the world scene that occurred during his tenure as President.[231][232][dead link] One analysis attributed Putin's popularity, in part, to state-owned or state-controlled television.[233]
    A joint poll by World Public Opinion in the US and Levada Center*[234] in Russia around June–July 2006 stated that "neither the Russian nor the American publics are convinced Russia is headed in an anti-democratic direction" and "Russians generally support Putin's concentration of political power and strongly support the re-nationalization of Russia's oil and gas industry." Russians generally support the political course of Putin and his team.[235] A 2005 survey showed that three times as many Russians felt the country was "more democratic" under Putin than it was during the Yeltsin or Gorbachev years, and the same proportion thought human rights were better under Putin than Yeltsin.[233]


    I don't think you have an understanding of what dictators do. All of the above could be said about Saddam Hussein and Stalin as well, probably.

  20. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 03 2007
    Location
    In a computer near you.
    Posts
    2,822
    Quote Originally Posted by GanjaFreebird View Post
    Of course, but he isn't a big fan of non-White people, we already know that.
    According to the MSM, Jews are white, so...does not compute.

    Besides, I loves me some Snouter.
    I Pledge Resistance, to the Nazi Flag, of the United Police States of America, and to the Private Federal Reserves for which it stands. One Corporation, under Goldman Sachs, unaccountable, with poverty and slavery for all.


  21. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 03 2007
    Location
    In a computer near you.
    Posts
    2,822
    Quote Originally Posted by GanjaFreebird View Post


    I don't think you have an understanding of what dictators do. All of the above could be said about Saddam Hussein and Stalin as well, probably.
    Then why are they not considered -
    the highest of any leader in the world
    I'm sure they are accounting for population.
    I Pledge Resistance, to the Nazi Flag, of the United Police States of America, and to the Private Federal Reserves for which it stands. One Corporation, under Goldman Sachs, unaccountable, with poverty and slavery for all.


  22. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 17 2003
    Location
    Hollywood
    Age
    28
    Posts
    20,857
    Quote Originally Posted by Going Postal View Post
    According to the MSM, Jews are white, so...does not compute.
    WTF? Jews are Semitic, just like Arabs, and in the "very long run", they are a mix of Caucasian and African people, probably, but hardly "White" at this point.

    Besides, I loves me some Snouter.
    Of course you do, because he's a self-hating Jew who tries to act "white". You love your Uncle Toms (and Shloms), I'm sure.

  23. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 17 2003
    Location
    Hollywood
    Age
    28
    Posts
    20,857
    Quote Originally Posted by Going Postal View Post
    Then why are they not considered - I'm sure they are accounting for population.
    Because they are dead and gone, but while they were dictators, they were "considered" to be all of that many other good things, so what, that shit's fake.

  24. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 21 2007
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    2,533
    Quote Originally Posted by Going Postal View Post
    I can't help it if the corrupt ogliarches are Jewish. You the one posted about the corruption; I showed you why.
    By no means all of them are, and were not encouraged in the first place by a Jew (Yeltsin), and the current president -who has reportedly enriched himself while in office to the tune of $40 billion- is not Jewish either.

    Perhaps you'd care to explain the following statements you cited...?

    "a Jewish reporter is in effect the enforcer of political correctness. He is the policeman and inquisitor of Jewish supremacism.”

    “[Stalin] knew that he could never fit in with the coterie of Jews who upon Lenin’s death circled like vultures around the Russian throne of power.”

    “[Advancement in Stalinist Russia] once again became based mostly on abilities and not Jewish tribal loyalties and connections”

    “Russia was still crippled and saddled by the inept and corrupt system of Jewish communism”

    “Jews seized control of most of wealth of Russia in undoubtedly the greatest series of criminal thefts in the history of mankind.”

    “Now this is the kind of man that the Jewish-dominated media loves!”

    “Russia is not communist any more, but the American government, under the domination of the Jewish neocons (who are former communists) acts more and more like the communists have acted for decades.”

    Quote Originally Posted by Going Postal View Post
    "Russians generally support Putin's concentration of political power and strongly support the re-nationalization of Russia's oil and gas industry." Russians generally support the political course of Putin and his team.[235] A 2005 survey showed that three times as many Russians felt the country was "more democratic" under Putin than it was during the Yeltsin or Gorbachev years, and the same proportion thought human rights were better under Putin than Yeltsin.[233]
    Not according to the hundreds of thousands of people who protested against the results of the last election and the reports from the OSCE. Foreign reporters are regularly 'watched', some have been killed and corruption is as bad as it ever was.
    Show us not the aim without the way, for ends and means on earth are so entangled
    That changing one, you change the other too; each different path brings other ends in view

  25. The Following User Says Thank You to Archaix For This Useful Post:

    GanjaFreebird (04-13-2012)

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. The Greatest Pitching Staff of All Time
    By Rapier in forum Sports
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 01-24-2011, 01:35 PM
  2. 'Greatest Metal Album Of All Time'
    By Victory in forum Arts, Entertainment, Music & Literature
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 05-19-2010, 04:49 PM
  3. One of the greatest songs of all time imo
    By Šñøü†ê® in forum Arts, Entertainment, Music & Literature
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-29-2010, 03:11 PM
  4. Could GW be the greatest president of all time?
    By I_beat_down_liberals in forum Political Debate
    Replies: 122
    Last Post: 07-17-2006, 06:22 PM
  5. HISTORY: One of the Greatest chopshows of all time!
    By ÆSiR in forum Ælternate Reality - The PhotoChop Shop
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-25-2002, 12:20 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts