Zordar:
You're a full-time artist yourself?I agree, they're great. In fact, I happen to be one.
Well, you have to be pretty good at what you do, at the very least, to be able to survive, so yeah, this is not for everybody, indeed.That doesn't mean the left's desire to see every adult child "find themselves" is realistic or healthy.
I agree.Anybody with half a brain who applies themselves can get a decent job; a very tiny minority of people who try to make a living as artists, entertainers, or athletes succeed. Sorry, but it's just not a club everybody has the talent or discipline to join.
Again I feel like I'm giving a primer here. Most people do gamble on not being sick... but if they are in an accident or have major illness, that's when they lose everything. And no one is being rescued, despite your typical condescending perspective. Anyone can lose their job at any time in this economy, hate to tell you.. and they won't be able to afford the premiums on their own right now.
What about those assets you spoke of previously? Why can they not be liquidated? If I was starving, but owned a watch, I'd damn sure sell that watch.
I am aware of how the lack of health insurance can set someone back financially. i am also well aware of how the lack of health insurance can help people move ahead.
A house? Savings? We are obviously not talking about a nice watch that can be pawned here. We are talking middle class with some assets. They aren't starving... no one said they were but they are the ones who lose their hard earned assets if there are huge medical expenses. And didn't you say you worked in insurance? I don't think you have the ability to look at the health insurance shakedown reasonably because it's all viewed from the standpoint of saving the insurance company money and making a profit from that side.
Yes. The house and savings are assets of the very nature that a watch is.
Dont get me wrong- I dont like insurance companies. But I like even less the prospect of being forced to subsidize a starving artist because they have chosen not to help themselves. Or a homeowner whose finances should have taken into account the prospect of a job loss. Or the deadbeat with a nice watch.
GanjaFreebird (03-27-2012)
I completely agree that some artists, musicians, and writers add value to our society...but 99.999% don't. Calling yourself an artist does not make you interesting...or talented.
Most of these people are pusuing a dream and want to do it at the expense of others. That's the part I have a problem with. Hey, I have an idea! Want to be an "artist"? "Poet"? How about work a normal job during the day to pay your bills and work on your craft on the evenings/weekends?
A "successful" artist can support him/herself doing their art full-time. Most can not.
"A Liberal is a person who will give away everything they don't own."
GanjaFreebird (03-27-2012)
If I misunderstand, please correct me. Pelosi says Obamacare will give the "whatevers" of our society the ability to get medical coverage. This is possible because we're going to force everyone to buy insurance at the point of a gun...including the "whatevers". Correct? So, in essence, people who don't want (or think they need) insurance will subsidize the "whatevers". Yes?
"A Liberal is a person who will give away everything they don't own."
They just want healthcare to be more accessible to people who have historically had a hard time getting and paying for it, self employed freelancers, photographers, writers, artists, etc. To me that's a positive thing. A person's worthiness for health insurance is not determined by their chosen profession.
Everybody should have health insurance in this country. I don't give a fuck if some republican scumbags don't like it. (Not you specifically.)
Last edited by optimus; 03-27-2012 at 04:37 PM.
_____________________________________________
I WILL NOT INSULT YOUR INTELLIGENCE BUT YOUR LACK OF INTELLECT IS FAIR GAME
Remember the axiom of big government bureaucrats: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. When, finally, under the crushing weight of taxes and regulation, it stops moving, subsidize it. Going Postal
And what do you do with people that have little or no fruits to show for their labor? Those self-employed "freelancers" (freeloaders?) that would rather paint and play the day away than get a job that pays all of their bills? Ahhh yes. Those of us that do not entertain such flights of fancy should pay their way, or at least a healthy chunk of it. Got it. But don't be surprised when the makers get a bit mindful of the takers. Its a natural reaction.
The strange thing is, healthcare insurance is just as accessible to the unemployed musician as to the accountant. the real difference? The accountant makes money for her work product,
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks