Ladies: would you rather date a guy who is 6'2", well-built and handsome but a little, uh, "under-equipped," or a guy who is 5'6", well-built and handsome and "well-equipped"?
Also, is there a point in which your decision would change? Examples: you'd take the 6'2" guy unless it turns out he actually has a micropenis (actually pretty rare), or you'd take the 5'6" guy, but 5'4" would just be too damned short?
Both men are equally skilled in the sexing. For all purposes of this discussion, the only difference is in their heights and their schlongs.
If you can only pick one, would it be height or ween? Discuss.