big steve (03-03-2012)
big steve (03-03-2012)
It isnt. So that is your argument? You invoke Jeffersonian Democracy as an argument, I then post the some excerpts of the definition of it, and you reply with "I wont rely on the authority of my legal judgement". Interesting that you would say that after your argument is proved wrong. Did you just make that up?
So, I guess I shouldnt rely on your authority on economics AND legal judgement.
America is a Constitutional Republic
A constitutional republic is a state in which the head of state and other officials are representatives of the people and must govern according to existing constitutional law that limits the government's power over all of its citizens. Because the head of the state is elected, it is a republic and not a monarchy.
In a constitutional republic, executive, legislative, and judicial powers are separated into distinct branches.[1]
The fact that a constitution exists that limits the government's power makes the state constitutional. That the head(s) of state and other officials are chosen by election, rather than inheriting their positions, and that their decisions are subject to judicial review makes the state a republic.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_republicPurpose and scope
John Adams defined a republic as "a government of laws, and not of men."[2] Constitutional republics attempt to weaken the threat of majoritarianism and protect dissenting individuals and minority groups from the "tyranny of the majority" by placing checks on the power of the majority of the population.[3] The power of the majority of the people is limited to electing representatives who legislate within the limits of an overarching constitutional law that a simple majority cannot modify.
No single individual is allowed to exercise executive, legislative and judicial powers. Instead, these powers are separated into distinct branches that serve as a check and balance on each other. In a constitutional republic, "no person or group [can] rise to absolute power."[4]
Ron Paul Revolution must continue...
www.lewrockwell.com
www.endthefed.com
Socialism is great until you run out of other people's money.
big steve (03-03-2012)
I had to laugh at the Georgetown co-eds that apparently spend upwards of $3000 a year on birth control. What a bunch of sluts, I wonder if they ever heard of keeping their knees together, I mean it's free and they would be savings huge amounts of money.
big steve (03-03-2012)
Bullshit. America is a Jeffersonian democracy: we elect representatives to form a government of the people, by the people, and for the people.Originally Posted by 302Riz;2259614[
We believe, as Jefferson did, in a system of checks and balances, separation of powers, and that democracy is not the tyranny of the majority. None of the those things is native to a constitutional republic, which can have any kind of government as long as there is a constitution and is not a monarchy.
Franco's Spain was a constitutional republic, but unlike the United States, it was not also a democracy. So America is not only A democracy, it is also THE democracy - the world's first true representative democracy.
Any claim to contrary is a stupid motherfucking pile of horseshit.![]()
Chachma v'Oz (03-02-2012), optimus (03-06-2012), Truth Teller (03-02-2012), Vader (03-02-2012)
Truth Teller (03-03-2012)
Cd. (03-03-2012), kellyb (03-06-2012), optimus (03-06-2012), Truth Teller (03-03-2012)
Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.
Abraham Lincoln
Chachma v'Oz (03-03-2012), Truth Teller (03-03-2012)
big steve (03-03-2012)
kellyb (03-06-2012), optimus (03-06-2012), Truth Teller (03-06-2012)
Wait. So, now birth control is a "right" of some kind? Why? Where is that guarantee found in the constitution? Furthermore, where is the requirement for employers to PAY for that "right"?
No one is forcing anything on anyone. If an employer has a moral objection (or simply does not want to pay for non-essential medical costs) that's not stopping the employee from going out and getting it on their own and paying for it themselves. There's also no one stopping the employee from finding employment elsewhere that better fits their wants/needs/desires as far as healthcare is concerned.
If access to "free" contraception paid for by employers is a "right", then I want my employer to buy me firearms. After all, the second amendment guarantees my right to keep and bear arms. Why is my employer forcing their anti-gun opinions on me!?!??!
Most employers don't pay for fertility treatments. I know because my wife and I paid for them out-of-pocket. To be quite honest, birth control pills are a minor expense in comparison. So, I don't feel a whole lot of sympathy for those who want it paid for.
"A Liberal is a person who will give away everything they don't own."
Just a minor correction. The testimony was that it was 3000 for the entire time in law school. That's 3 years. That amounts to ~83 per month for a BC prescription, which is not covered under the insurance that the students are mandated to purchase. With BC not being covered under insurance, 83 per month is quite reasonable.
No one is asking insurance to cover condoms or any other OTC product. Just the prescription ones.
The Georgetown studends have to pay for insurance as mandated by the school, and that plan is not meeting their needs. They want this remedied, so they went to the school and got turned down. She was telling her story, and illustrating the situation faced by students there.
She was then "jokingly" referred to as a slut and a prostitute who was wanting taxpayers to pay her to have sex. Nothing could have been further from the truth of her testimony. Nowhere did she say, she should receive cash to have sex. She simply wanted a prescription covered under her insurance plan.
Whether the school is obligated to cover that is the issue.
Lulu (03-06-2012), Truth Teller (03-06-2012)
Just a minor correction:
This is about the left forcing their will on a religious institution spearheaded by a kook activist.have no idea what kind of birth control she was claiming cost $3,000. Out of pocket, condoms are free or about $1, the Pill costs as low as $4 a month/ $10 over three months, an IUD is $500 but lasts 5 years, etc. There really is not a birth control that should cost $3,000 over 3 years
http://www.alexashrugged.com/2012/03...dra-fluke.html
Lulu (03-06-2012), Truth Teller (03-06-2012)
Truth Teller (03-06-2012)
"A Liberal is a person who will give away everything they don't own."
Truth Teller (03-06-2012)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks