+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 94

Thread: Blunt Amendment Killed In The Senate

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 29 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    6,412
    Quote Originally Posted by Truth Teller View Post
    The Blunt Amendment failed ,it was yet another try by the right-wing to exepmt any employer from paying for birth control in the GOP's endless war against women of child bearing age.
    Kooks have a never ending supply of exaggerations.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to DamnYankee For This Useful Post:

    big steve (03-03-2012)

  3. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 03 2002
    Location
    Long Island, Noo Yawk
    Age
    35
    Posts
    20,364
    Quote Originally Posted by Cyclone Ranger View Post
    You also don't believe America is a democracy, so I hope you'll understand if I don't rely on the authority of your legal judgment.
    It isnt. So that is your argument? You invoke Jeffersonian Democracy as an argument, I then post the some excerpts of the definition of it, and you reply with "I wont rely on the authority of my legal judgement". Interesting that you would say that after your argument is proved wrong. Did you just make that up?
    So, I guess I shouldnt rely on your authority on economics AND legal judgement.

    America is a Constitutional Republic

    A constitutional republic is a state in which the head of state and other officials are representatives of the people and must govern according to existing constitutional law that limits the government's power over all of its citizens. Because the head of the state is elected, it is a republic and not a monarchy.
    In a constitutional republic, executive, legislative, and judicial powers are separated into distinct branches.[1]
    The fact that a constitution exists that limits the government's power makes the state constitutional. That the head(s) of state and other officials are chosen by election, rather than inheriting their positions, and that their decisions are subject to judicial review makes the state a republic.
    Purpose and scope

    John Adams defined a republic as "a government of laws, and not of men."[2] Constitutional republics attempt to weaken the threat of majoritarianism and protect dissenting individuals and minority groups from the "tyranny of the majority" by placing checks on the power of the majority of the population.[3] The power of the majority of the people is limited to electing representatives who legislate within the limits of an overarching constitutional law that a simple majority cannot modify.
    No single individual is allowed to exercise executive, legislative and judicial powers. Instead, these powers are separated into distinct branches that serve as a check and balance on each other. In a constitutional republic, "no person or group [can] rise to absolute power."[4]
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_republic
    Ron Paul Revolution must continue...
    www.lewrockwell.com
    www.endthefed.com
    Socialism is great until you run out of other people's money.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to 302Riz For This Useful Post:

    big steve (03-03-2012)

  5. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 29 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    6,412
    I had to laugh at the Georgetown co-eds that apparently spend upwards of $3000 a year on birth control. What a bunch of sluts, I wonder if they ever heard of keeping their knees together, I mean it's free and they would be savings huge amounts of money.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to DamnYankee For This Useful Post:

    big steve (03-03-2012)

  7. #24
    86Dùde's Avatar
    86Dùde is offline Definitely here NOT to please!
    Join Date
    Jun 27 2001
    Location
    RKansas
    Posts
    57,512
    Quote Originally Posted by Cyclone Ranger View Post
    *yawn*
    *farts*

  8. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 22 2006
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    31,548
    Quote Originally Posted by 302Riz;2259614[
    It isnt. So that is your argument? You invoke Jeffersonian Democracy as an argument, I then post the some excerpts of the definition of it, and you reply with "I wont rely on the authority of my legal judgement". Interesting that you would say that proving your argument wrong.
    Bullshit. America is a Jeffersonian democracy: we elect representatives to form a government of the people, by the people, and for the people.

    We believe, as Jefferson did, in a system of checks and balances, separation of powers, and that democracy is not the tyranny of the majority. None of the those things is native to a constitutional republic, which can have any kind of government as long as there is a constitution and is not a monarchy.

    Franco's Spain was a constitutional republic, but unlike the United States, it was not also a democracy. So America is not only A democracy, it is also THE democracy - the world's first true representative democracy.

    Any claim to contrary is a stupid motherfucking pile of horseshit.

  9. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Cyclone Ranger For This Useful Post:

    Chachma v'Oz (03-02-2012), optimus (03-06-2012), Truth Teller (03-02-2012), Vader (03-02-2012)

  10. #26
    Join Date
    May 27 2010
    Location
    Whitewater, CO
    Posts
    3,631
    Quote Originally Posted by Cyclone Ranger View Post
    The scandal is employers thinking they have the right to force their religious beliefs on employees.
    EXACTLY. The thing is ... it is what they do and their republigoon sevants (most of whom are ignorant enough to believe the USA is a theocracy) want business to have this right. It is the reason they need to be removed from office.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Vader For This Useful Post:

    Truth Teller (03-03-2012)

  12. #27
    Join Date
    May 27 2010
    Location
    Whitewater, CO
    Posts
    3,631
    Quote Originally Posted by DamnYankee View Post
    I had to laugh at the Georgetown co-eds that apparently spend upwards of $3000 a year on birth control. What a bunch of sluts, I wonder if they ever heard of keeping their knees together, I mean it's free and they would be savings huge amounts of money.
    Keep your opinion to yourself ... you self-rightious republican shitbag.

  13. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Vader For This Useful Post:

    Cd. (03-03-2012), kellyb (03-06-2012), optimus (03-06-2012), Truth Teller (03-03-2012)

  14. #28
    hadit is offline Super Moderator Super Mod
    Join Date
    Nov 24 2004
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    27,830
    Quote Originally Posted by Vader View Post
    Keep your opinion to yourself ... you self-rightious republican shitbag.
    Hey, you found another one! Keep it up, you'll be back in top form in no time!
    The ambassador died, Obama lied.

  15. #29
    Cd.'s Avatar
    Cd. is offline Get off my jock! Discussion Leader
    Join Date
    Jul 05 2001
    Location
    Banned camp.
    Age
    51
    Posts
    21,147
    Quote Originally Posted by 302Riz View Post
    Repeal obummercare, give the rights back to the people, where it belongs and all this petty shit will go away and healthcare will eventually get cheaper.
    Actually the Affordable Healthcare Act gives the power to the people. What you really mean to say is "give the power back to the corporations who are robbing us blind while fucking us over!"
    Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.
    Abraham Lincoln



  16. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cd. For This Useful Post:

    Chachma v'Oz (03-03-2012), Truth Teller (03-03-2012)

  17. #30
    Join Date
    Jul 29 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    6,412
    Quote Originally Posted by Cd. View Post
    Actually the Affordable Healthcare Act gives the power to the people. What you really mean to say is "give the power back to the corporations who are robbing us blind while fucking us over!"
    As if Big Gov't is any better.

    What BO gives, BO can take away, including birth control for leftist sluts.

    Deal with it.

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to DamnYankee For This Useful Post:

    big steve (03-03-2012)

  19. #31
    Join Date
    May 27 2010
    Location
    Whitewater, CO
    Posts
    3,631
    Quote Originally Posted by DamnYankee View Post
    As if Big Gov't is any better.

    What BO gives, BO can take away, including birth control for leftist sluts.

    Deal with it.
    Spare us your lame opinion. You sorry right wing nazi asshole.

    ]

  20. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Vader For This Useful Post:

    kellyb (03-06-2012), optimus (03-06-2012), Truth Teller (03-06-2012)

  21. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 02 2002
    Location
    Chicago
    Age
    41
    Posts
    15,774
    Quote Originally Posted by Truth Teller View Post
    The Blunt Amendment failed ,it was yet another try by the right-wing to exepmt any employer from paying for birth control in the GOP's endless war against women of child bearing age.
    Wait. So, now birth control is a "right" of some kind? Why? Where is that guarantee found in the constitution? Furthermore, where is the requirement for employers to PAY for that "right"?

    No one is forcing anything on anyone. If an employer has a moral objection (or simply does not want to pay for non-essential medical costs) that's not stopping the employee from going out and getting it on their own and paying for it themselves. There's also no one stopping the employee from finding employment elsewhere that better fits their wants/needs/desires as far as healthcare is concerned.

    If access to "free" contraception paid for by employers is a "right", then I want my employer to buy me firearms. After all, the second amendment guarantees my right to keep and bear arms. Why is my employer forcing their anti-gun opinions on me!?!??!

    Most employers don't pay for fertility treatments. I know because my wife and I paid for them out-of-pocket. To be quite honest, birth control pills are a minor expense in comparison. So, I don't feel a whole lot of sympathy for those who want it paid for.
    "A Liberal is a person who will give away everything they don't own."

  22. #33
    hadit is offline Super Moderator Super Mod
    Join Date
    Nov 24 2004
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    27,830
    Quote Originally Posted by soylentgreen View Post
    Wait. So, now birth control is a "right" of some kind? Why? Where is that guarantee found in the constitution? Furthermore, where is the requirement for employers to PAY for that "right"?

    No one is forcing anything on anyone. If an employer has a moral objection (or simply does not want to pay for non-essential medical costs) that's not stopping the employee from going out and getting it on their own and paying for it themselves. There's also no one stopping the employee from finding employment elsewhere that better fits their wants/needs/desires as far as healthcare is concerned.

    If access to "free" contraception paid for by employers is a "right", then I want my employer to buy me firearms. After all, the second amendment guarantees my right to keep and bear arms. Why is my employer forcing their anti-gun opinions on me!?!??!

    Most employers don't pay for fertility treatments. I know because my wife and I paid for them out-of-pocket. To be quite honest, birth control pills are a minor expense in comparison. So, I don't feel a whole lot of sympathy for those who want it paid for.
    That is the correct motorcycle. There is no "OHNOES, THE EEVUULLL WEPUBWICANS HATE WOMENS AND DON WANNA GIVE THEM PILLLLSSS!" crap. That's absolute stupidity, even on democrat terms.
    The ambassador died, Obama lied.

  23. #34
    Join Date
    Jul 23 2009
    Location
    Divorceland
    Posts
    6,669
    Quote Originally Posted by DamnYankee View Post
    I had to laugh at the Georgetown co-eds that apparently spend upwards of $3000 a year on birth control. What a bunch of sluts, I wonder if they ever heard of keeping their knees together, I mean it's free and they would be savings huge amounts of money.
    Just a minor correction. The testimony was that it was 3000 for the entire time in law school. That's 3 years. That amounts to ~83 per month for a BC prescription, which is not covered under the insurance that the students are mandated to purchase. With BC not being covered under insurance, 83 per month is quite reasonable.

    No one is asking insurance to cover condoms or any other OTC product. Just the prescription ones.

    The Georgetown studends have to pay for insurance as mandated by the school, and that plan is not meeting their needs. They want this remedied, so they went to the school and got turned down. She was telling her story, and illustrating the situation faced by students there.

    She was then "jokingly" referred to as a slut and a prostitute who was wanting taxpayers to pay her to have sex. Nothing could have been further from the truth of her testimony. Nowhere did she say, she should receive cash to have sex. She simply wanted a prescription covered under her insurance plan.

    Whether the school is obligated to cover that is the issue.
    ***2009 DA Rookie of the Year***

    Quote Originally Posted by Adanch View Post
    I like it!!! Dick and all!



    Quote Originally Posted by fat mike View Post
    we need to keep tinkerbelle out of jail-the lesbians would kill each other trying to get at her

  24. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Sparkly Mary For This Useful Post:

    Lulu (03-06-2012), Truth Teller (03-06-2012)

  25. #35
    86Dùde's Avatar
    86Dùde is offline Definitely here NOT to please!
    Join Date
    Jun 27 2001
    Location
    RKansas
    Posts
    57,512
    Quote Originally Posted by Vader View Post
    Spare us your lame opinion. You sorry right wing nazi asshole.

    ]
    Go pack fudge with your ton ton vader!

  26. #36
    Join Date
    Jul 29 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    6,412
    Quote Originally Posted by Sparkly Mary View Post
    Just a minor correction. The testimony was that it was 3000 for the entire time in law school. That's 3 years. That amounts to ~83 per month for a BC prescription, which is not covered under the insurance that the students are mandated to purchase. With BC not being covered under insurance, 83 per month is quite reasonable.

    No one is asking insurance to cover condoms or any other OTC product. Just the prescription ones.

    The Georgetown studends have to pay for insurance as mandated by the school, and that plan is not meeting their needs. They want this remedied, so they went to the school and got turned down. She was telling her story, and illustrating the situation faced by students there.

    She was then "jokingly" referred to as a slut and a prostitute who was wanting taxpayers to pay her to have sex. Nothing could have been further from the truth of her testimony. Nowhere did she say, she should receive cash to have sex. She simply wanted a prescription covered under her insurance plan.

    Whether the school is obligated to cover that is the issue.
    Just a minor correction:

    have no idea what kind of birth control she was claiming cost $3,000. Out of pocket, condoms are free or about $1, the Pill costs as low as $4 a month/ $10 over three months, an IUD is $500 but lasts 5 years, etc. There really is not a birth control that should cost $3,000 over 3 years
    This is about the left forcing their will on a religious institution spearheaded by a kook activist.

    http://www.alexashrugged.com/2012/03...dra-fluke.html

  27. #37
    Join Date
    Jul 23 2009
    Location
    Divorceland
    Posts
    6,669
    Quote Originally Posted by DamnYankee View Post
    Just a minor correction:



    This is about the left forcing their will on a religious institution spearheaded by a kook activist.

    http://www.alexashrugged.com/2012/03...dra-fluke.html
    Again...not all brands of BC pills are available in generics and not all brands will work for all women.
    Lulu is a prime example as she's posted that the pills she is on are not some of the cheaper ones, but they are the only ones that work for her.
    ***2009 DA Rookie of the Year***

    Quote Originally Posted by Adanch View Post
    I like it!!! Dick and all!



    Quote Originally Posted by fat mike View Post
    we need to keep tinkerbelle out of jail-the lesbians would kill each other trying to get at her

  28. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Sparkly Mary For This Useful Post:

    Lulu (03-06-2012), Truth Teller (03-06-2012)

  29. #38
    Join Date
    Sep 22 2006
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    31,548
    Quote Originally Posted by soylentgreen View Post
    Wait. So, now birth control is a "right" of some kind? Why? Where is that guarantee found in the constitution?
    Not all rights are enumerated.

  30. The Following User Says Thank You to Cyclone Ranger For This Useful Post:

    Truth Teller (03-06-2012)

  31. #39
    Join Date
    Jan 02 2002
    Location
    Chicago
    Age
    41
    Posts
    15,774
    Quote Originally Posted by hadit View Post
    That is the correct motorcycle. There is no "OHNOES, THE EEVUULLL WEPUBWICANS HATE WOMENS AND DON WANNA GIVE THEM PILLLLSSS!" crap. That's absolute stupidity, even on democrat terms.
    If we were talking about life-saving medications, I'd be completely and totally on their side. But, we're not. We're talking about medications that impede the natural functioning of the human body...and in 99.99% of women it is not a necessary treatment for any disease.
    "A Liberal is a person who will give away everything they don't own."

  32. #40
    Join Date
    May 26 2002
    Location
    California
    Posts
    15,745
    Quote Originally Posted by DamnYankee View Post
    I had to laugh at the Georgetown co-eds that apparently spend upwards of $3000 a year on birth control. What a bunch of sluts, I wonder if they ever heard of keeping their knees together, I mean it's free and they would be savings huge amounts of money.
    Sig worthy. A nice little insight into the deranged mind of a rightist.

  33. The Following User Says Thank You to optimus For This Useful Post:

    Truth Teller (03-06-2012)

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Flag-Burning Amendment Fails In Senate
    By jwreck in forum In The News
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 06-30-2006, 09:34 AM
  2. Senate committee approves flag amendment
    By Red in forum In The News
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 06-17-2006, 02:12 PM
  3. What is a BLUNT ???
    By angelone in forum The Lounge
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 05-28-2006, 02:08 PM
  4. Replies: 133
    Last Post: 07-20-2004, 11:01 PM
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-19-2004, 08:56 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts