hadit doesn't understand how insurance works. That is quite clear from his posts. I'm done offering my primer in how premiums, deductibles and insurance work. He's on his own from now on.
Oh, he gets it alright. He just doesn't want to admit that we're right to request that our insurance providers cover prescription contraceptives. He doesn't want to admit that a Catholic college is picking and choosing which laws it wants to follow.
It's much easier to call us sluts and try to stomp around spouting off like we're expecting him personally to pay for it. He knows how insurance works. He's being obtuse because he's been constantly called out on it.
It's much easier to continue to hide behind a false assumption than to admit he can see what our point is.
You're probably right. I have yet to see any reason or any rationale why they think THEY are paying for it. Except of course because Rush says so.
It's easier to demonize women, than admit that lack of affordable prescription contraceptives is a problem that needs to be addressed, and again, that religious organizations are picking and choosing which laws they think they need to follow, but expect the state/federal dollars to continue to flow in.
Until now, the First Amendment protected the Catholic Church from Congress forcing it to go against its religious principals. Now Obama is trying to force them to provide contraceptives, something they have never accepted. You know this.He doesn't want to admit that a Catholic college is picking and choosing which laws it wants to follow.
Produce evidence of where I called anyone a slut or retract the statement.It's much easier to call us sluts
I have been consistent with where my disagreement lies. I pay now for insurance that provides contraceptives, but I do so willingly. I don't want the government assuming the power to dictate that religious organizations have to act against their beliefs.and try to stomp around spouting off like we're expecting him personally to pay for it. He knows how insurance works. He's being obtuse because he's been constantly called out on it.
The only place we disagree is on the government forcing religious institutions to act against their religious beliefs. I thought you knew that, because I've explained it multiple times. Or is it just easier to ignore all that than to admit I not only see your point but agree with most of it?It's much easier to continue to hide behind a false assumption than to admit he can see what our point is.
Seriously, I tire of the collective you mischaracterizing my position on this.
The ambassador died, Obama lied.
"A Liberal is a person who will give away everything they don't own."
I as a Harvard law student agree that in the strict sense of the word USA is not a proper democracy
Mitt Romney was against the Blunt Amendment before he was for it:
It is difficult for any decent person to sit back and not comment on the anti-Semitism,racism ,sexism ,and all-around ignorance espoused on the majority of DA's posts,it's fucking sad when one gets a warning for simply being a decent person.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)