Closed Thread
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5
Results 81 to 99 of 99

Thread: Can the president now order Kosher delis to give away pork?

  1. #81
    Join Date
    Mar 21 2002
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    16,319
    Quote Originally Posted by Vader View Post
    That law applies to CITIZENS .... NOT TO BUSINESSES. Why do you righty idiots have such a hard time understanding that? The 2nd Amendment DOES NOT give business the right to force their religion on others.

    Pull your head out of your inbred ass and realize it.
    Have any of the useless mods on this site warned, or banned this troll for violations of the TOS yet?

  2. #82
    Join Date
    May 27 2010
    Location
    Whitewater, CO
    Posts
    3,633
    Free Exercise Clause The Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause represent flip sides of the same coin. Whereas the Establishment Clause focuses on government action that would create, support, or endorse an official national religion, the Free Exercise Clause focuses on the pernicious effects that government action may have on an individual's religious beliefs or practices. Like the Establishment Clause, the Free Exercise Clause was drafted in response to the Framers' desire to protect members of religious minorities from persecution.
    The Framers' understanding of the Free Exercise Clause is illustrated by the New York Constitution of 1777, which stated,
    [T]he free exercise and enjoyment of religious … worship, without discrimination or preference, shall forever … be allowed … to all mankind: Provided, that the liberty of conscience, hereby granted, shall not be so construed as to excuse acts of licentiousness, or justify practices inconsistent with the peace or safety of this State. (N.Y. Const. Art. 1 §

    See: http://legal-dictionary.thefreedicti...irst+amendment


    Thiis article explains that while freedom of belief is assurred; however, it DOES NOT justify practices inconsistaent with peace and safety.

    Ergo ... YOU REPUBLICAN IDIOTS CANNOT FORCE YOUR BULLSHIT ON OTHER PEOPLE!





  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Vader For This Useful Post:

    optimus (02-17-2012)

  4. #83
    Join Date
    Nov 26 2004
    Location
    Atlanta
    Age
    53
    Posts
    20,268
    What do contraceptives have to do with peace or safety of the State?
    When will the world learn that a million men are of no importance compared with one man? [Henry David Thoreau]

  5. #84
    Join Date
    May 27 2010
    Location
    Whitewater, CO
    Posts
    3,633
    Quote Originally Posted by Freedom&Liberty View Post
    What do contraceptives have to do with peace or safety of the State?
    The above-mentioned clause was created to protect the MINORITY from religious persecution. (the Free Exercise Clause was drafted in response to the Framers' desire to protect members of religious minorities from persecution.)

    You forcing your religious based views on contraceptives is nothing more than persecution of the minority. Therefore, you are in violation of the Free Exercise Clause and are no better than a 3rd world dictator.

  6. #85
    Join Date
    May 27 2010
    Location
    Whitewater, CO
    Posts
    3,633
    Quote Originally Posted by DngrMse View Post
    Have any of the useless mods on this site warned, or banned this troll for violations of the TOS yet?
    1. I am not a troll.
    2. Everybody shit-talks
    3. If you don't like it, YOU ARE FREE TO FIND SOME OTHER PLACE TO POST.

  7. #86
    Join Date
    Mar 21 2002
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    16,319
    Quote Originally Posted by Vader View Post
    Free Exercise Clause The Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause represent flip sides of the same coin. Whereas the Establishment Clause focuses on government action that would create, support, or endorse an official national religion, the Free Exercise Clause focuses on the pernicious effects that government action may have on an individual's religious beliefs or practices. Like the Establishment Clause, the Free Exercise Clause was drafted in response to the Framers' desire to protect members of religious minorities from persecution.
    The Framers' understanding of the Free Exercise Clause is illustrated by the New York Constitution of 1777, which stated,
    [T]he free exercise and enjoyment of religious … worship, without discrimination or preference, shall forever … be allowed … to all mankind: Provided, that the liberty of conscience, hereby granted, shall not be so construed as to excuse acts of licentiousness, or justify practices inconsistent with the peace or safety of this State. (N.Y. Const. Art. 1 §

    See: http://legal-dictionary.thefreedicti...irst+amendment


    Thiis article explains that while freedom of belief is assurred; however, it DOES NOT justify practices inconsistaent with peace and safety.

    Ergo ... YOU REPUBLICAN IDIOTS CANNOT FORCE YOUR BULLSHIT ON OTHER PEOPLE!




    I'm guessing the continued menstrual flow from this douche means...no?

  8. #87
    Join Date
    May 27 2010
    Location
    Whitewater, CO
    Posts
    3,633
    Quote Originally Posted by DngrMse View Post
    I'm guessing the continued menstrual flow from this douche means...no?
    Thank you for proving my point. You are now a discredited hypocrite. Kindly cease your spewage.

  9. #88
    Join Date
    Nov 26 2004
    Location
    Atlanta
    Age
    53
    Posts
    20,268
    Quote Originally Posted by Vader View Post
    The above-mentioned clause was created to protect the MINORITY from religious persecution. (the Free Exercise Clause was drafted in response to the Framers' desire to protect members of religious minorities from persecution.)

    You forcing your religious based views on contraceptives is nothing more than persecution of the minority. Therefore, you are in violation of the Free Exercise Clause and are no better than a 3rd world dictator.
    Refusing to hand out rubbers is not forcing religion on anyone. Grow a brain, idiot.
    When will the world learn that a million men are of no importance compared with one man? [Henry David Thoreau]

  10. #89
    Join Date
    Mar 21 2002
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    16,319
    Quote Originally Posted by Vader View Post
    Thank you for proving my point. You are now a discredited hypocrite. Kindly cease your spewage.

    You had a point?

  11. #90
    Join Date
    May 27 2010
    Location
    Whitewater, CO
    Posts
    3,633
    Quote Originally Posted by Freedom&Liberty View Post
    Refusing to hand out rubbers is not forcing religion on anyone. Grow a brain, idiot.
    If you're refusing to do so because of your religious beliefs, THEN YES IT IS FORCING YOUR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS ON OTHERS.

    I am sorry your tiny little republitroll mind cannot grasp this concept.

  12. #91
    Join Date
    May 27 2010
    Location
    Whitewater, CO
    Posts
    3,633
    Quote Originally Posted by DngrMse View Post
    You had a point?
    Yes, I do, but sadly, you lack the IQ to grasp it.

  13. #92
    Join Date
    Mar 21 2002
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    16,319
    Quote Originally Posted by Vader View Post
    If you're refusing to do so because of your religious beliefs, THEN YES IT IS FORCING YOUR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS ON OTHERS.

    I am sorry your tiny little republitroll mind cannot grasp this concept.
    I've just really gotta wonder why the cunt mods on this site don't ban this troll. It's a mystery.

  14. #93
    Join Date
    Nov 26 2004
    Location
    Atlanta
    Age
    53
    Posts
    20,268
    Why I'm doing it is irrelevant. I could be an atheist and still refuse to handout rubbers.
    When will the world learn that a million men are of no importance compared with one man? [Henry David Thoreau]

  15. #94
    Join Date
    Mar 21 2002
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    16,319
    Quote Originally Posted by Vader View Post
    Yes, I do, but sadly, you lack the IQ to grasp it.
    Once again, why is this whimpering cock sucker allowed to violate this sites TOS with impunity? Sivulk? Pull this guy's dick from your mouth, and weigh in here.

  16. #95
    Join Date
    Nov 26 2004
    Location
    Atlanta
    Age
    53
    Posts
    20,268
    Quote Originally Posted by DngrMse View Post
    I've just really gotta wonder why the cunt mods on this site don't ban this troll. It's a mystery.
    Vader posts so that the liberals here will have someone to admire. He's a harmless moron.
    When will the world learn that a million men are of no importance compared with one man? [Henry David Thoreau]

  17. #96
    Join Date
    Mar 21 2002
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    16,319
    He's a repetitive moron. But...if the libs want to suck at that cock...so be it.

    P.S. Sivulk..that means you.

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to DngrMse For This Useful Post:

    Freedom&Liberty (02-17-2012)

  19. #97
    Join Date
    Nov 26 2004
    Location
    Atlanta
    Age
    53
    Posts
    20,268
    I take it you heard about Dick.
    When will the world learn that a million men are of no importance compared with one man? [Henry David Thoreau]

  20. #98
    Join Date
    Mar 21 2002
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    16,319
    Quote Originally Posted by Freedom&Liberty View Post
    I take it you heard about Dick.
    Yeah, he's banned, but this troll, Vader...who manages to violate the tos of this site with every post is still here?

    Siv? You there? Fuck you.

  21. #99
    Join Date
    May 06 2005
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario
    Age
    27
    Posts
    7,617
    Recently it has been kind of difficult to take any punitive action towards Vader since he recently was banned for two weeks and was inactive until recently.

    And for the record, retaliation, especially in excess is not an effective dispute resolution technique.

Closed Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Super kosher mental cases ain't so kosher after all
    By Šñøü†ê® in forum In The News
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-01-2010, 11:36 PM
  2. Replies: 40
    Last Post: 08-31-2009, 10:12 AM
  3. President Jimmy Carter's Exec Order (23 May 1979)
    By KillZone in forum In The News
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-23-2005, 05:58 AM
  4. Bush refuses to give Afghani 'president' power over anything
    By Ras Bizarre High in forum In The News
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-24-2005, 12:46 PM
  5. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-08-2004, 07:49 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts