+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 24

Thread: The zionist regime gets more US taxpayer cash because of an "iron clad commitment" or something

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 23 2001
    Location
    Long Island Sound
    Posts
    41,570

    The zionist regime gets more US taxpayer cash because of an "iron clad commitment" or something

    This is all hard to believe. Especially considering the zionist regime has claimed for itself offshore natural gas fields.

    The Obama administration told Israeli officials this week that the U.S. plans to extend for three years $3.8 billion in loan guarantees to Israel...The loan guarantees are in addition to the unmatched support Washington gives to Israel – over $13 billion in direct aid since 2007 and more than $3 billion more scheduled for fiscal year 2012, not to mention privileged deals in military training and equipment. Many view this support as facilitating and endorsing Israel’s consistent oppression of Palestinians and numerous violations of international law, yet it is the most consensus-driven issue in Washington.
    I don't think the trillions spent fighting their AIPAC WARS are factored into the calculation.

    http://news.antiwar.com/2012/01/24/u...ees-to-israel/
    Last edited by Šñøü†ê®; 01-25-2012 at 03:42 AM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 23 2001
    Location
    Long Island Sound
    Posts
    41,570
    Crazy CCC, thoughts?


  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 22 2006
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    31,548
    Why do you keep citing a mentally homeless person....besides the fact that you're also mentally ill and unemployed?

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Cyclone Ranger For This Useful Post:

    GanjaFreebird (01-25-2012)

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 07 2006
    Location
    Northwest Peninsula
    Posts
    11,154
    Israel should be paying us protection money.
    _____________________________________________
    I WILL NOT INSULT YOUR INTELLIGENCE BUT YOUR LACK OF INTELLECT IS FAIR GAME

    Remember the axiom of big government bureaucrats: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. When, finally, under the crushing weight of taxes and regulation, it stops moving, subsidize it. Going Postal

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to antiquity For This Useful Post:

    Šñøü†ê® (01-25-2012)

  7. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 07 2006
    Location
    Northwest Peninsula
    Posts
    11,154
    Quote Originally Posted by Cyclone Ranger View Post
    Why do you keep citing a mentally homeless person....besides the fact that you're also mentally ill and unemployed?
    Speaking of mentally ill and unemployed, how your mental health and employment going these days?
    _____________________________________________
    I WILL NOT INSULT YOUR INTELLIGENCE BUT YOUR LACK OF INTELLECT IS FAIR GAME

    Remember the axiom of big government bureaucrats: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. When, finally, under the crushing weight of taxes and regulation, it stops moving, subsidize it. Going Postal

  8. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 17 2003
    Location
    Hollywood
    Age
    28
    Posts
    20,811
    Quote Originally Posted by Cyclone Ranger View Post
    Why do you keep citing a mentally homeless person....besides the fact that you're also mentally ill and unemployed?

    HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

  9. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 17 2003
    Location
    Hollywood
    Age
    28
    Posts
    20,811
    Quote Originally Posted by antiquity View Post
    Israel should be paying us protection money.
    They already have by giving away Sinai (with all of the oil) to Egypt in the late 1970s, actually.

  10. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 07 2006
    Location
    Northwest Peninsula
    Posts
    11,154
    It wasn't Israel's to give away.
    _____________________________________________
    I WILL NOT INSULT YOUR INTELLIGENCE BUT YOUR LACK OF INTELLECT IS FAIR GAME

    Remember the axiom of big government bureaucrats: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. When, finally, under the crushing weight of taxes and regulation, it stops moving, subsidize it. Going Postal

  11. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 17 2003
    Location
    Hollywood
    Age
    28
    Posts
    20,811
    Quote Originally Posted by antiquity View Post
    It wasn't Israel's to give away.
    It sure was between 1967-1979. Egypt tried to do shit about it in 1973 by attacking us on our holliest day of the year, and almost lost the rest of their country to Israel then. The only thing that saved them from a complete ass kicking by Israel was Soviet Union...fuckin' communists.

    Now, after that, Egypt realized that the only way they could get that land back was by making a deal with America to pressure Israel in return for benefiting American interests, and pretending to be at peace with Israel. The American gov't apparently felt that giving Israel all of that money would directly and indirectly benefit their interests in the middle east, if only Israel gave that land back to Egypt. Sadat was obviously a business genius by also getting Jimmy Carter to sign 2-3 billions a year to Egypt (which continues to this day) as a part of this deal, and it's too bad that the insane savages in his country couldn't appreciate something like that and killed him because he wasn't enough of a barbarian for them.

  12. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 07 2006
    Location
    Northwest Peninsula
    Posts
    11,154
    It wasn't Israel's to give away any more than Iraq, Germany and Japan is ours.
    _____________________________________________
    I WILL NOT INSULT YOUR INTELLIGENCE BUT YOUR LACK OF INTELLECT IS FAIR GAME

    Remember the axiom of big government bureaucrats: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. When, finally, under the crushing weight of taxes and regulation, it stops moving, subsidize it. Going Postal

  13. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 22 2006
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    31,548
    Israel wasn't Egypt's to invade either.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Cyclone Ranger For This Useful Post:

    GanjaFreebird (01-26-2012)

  15. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 17 2003
    Location
    Hollywood
    Age
    28
    Posts
    20,811
    Quote Originally Posted by antiquity View Post
    It wasn't Israel's to give away any more than Iraq, Germany and Japan is ours.
    It was technically Israel's land, and Israel didn't have to give it back. You can't make a business deal with somebody, and then claim that they didn't own the property that they gave away to begin with, this is not how it works. The point is that Egypt attacked Israel, lost their land, and then there was a deal being made to return that land to them. If you don't like that deal, take this issue up with Jimmy Carter. How the fuck is it Israel's fault that he chose to pressure them and bribe them?

  16. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 17 2003
    Location
    Hollywood
    Age
    28
    Posts
    20,811
    Quote Originally Posted by Cyclone Ranger View Post
    Israel wasn't Egypt's to invade either.
    EXACTLY!!

  17. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 07 2006
    Location
    Northwest Peninsula
    Posts
    11,154
    Quote Originally Posted by Cyclone Ranger View Post
    Israel wasn't Egypt's to invade either.
    Egypt didn't invade Israel. Israel invaded Egypt.

    sraeli armed forces push into Egypt toward the Suez Canal, initiating the Suez Crisis. They would soon be joined by French and British forces, creating a serious Cold War problem in the Middle East.

    The catalyst for the joint Israeli-British-French attack on Egypt was the nationalization of the Suez Canal by Egyptian leader General Gamal Abdel Nasser in July 1956
    Arabs did not invade Israel they lived there. Palestinians were driven out of their country to make place for the Jews who came there from Europe and other places.
    _____________________________________________
    I WILL NOT INSULT YOUR INTELLIGENCE BUT YOUR LACK OF INTELLECT IS FAIR GAME

    Remember the axiom of big government bureaucrats: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. When, finally, under the crushing weight of taxes and regulation, it stops moving, subsidize it. Going Postal

  18. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 22 2006
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    31,548
    What's that have to do with the '73 invasion on Yom Kippur?

  19. The Following User Says Thank You to Cyclone Ranger For This Useful Post:

    GanjaFreebird (01-26-2012)

  20. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 07 2006
    Location
    Northwest Peninsula
    Posts
    11,154
    It proves that Israel is an aggressive country who cares little about human rights.
    _____________________________________________
    I WILL NOT INSULT YOUR INTELLIGENCE BUT YOUR LACK OF INTELLECT IS FAIR GAME

    Remember the axiom of big government bureaucrats: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. When, finally, under the crushing weight of taxes and regulation, it stops moving, subsidize it. Going Postal

  21. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 22 2006
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    31,548
    Bullshit. 1956 was the one time in history they aggressively invaded without being provoked by an attack from their neighbors. Generalizing from an exception is unwarranted.

  22. The Following User Says Thank You to Cyclone Ranger For This Useful Post:

    GanjaFreebird (01-26-2012)

  23. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 07 2006
    Location
    Northwest Peninsula
    Posts
    11,154
    Like I said, It proves that Israel is an aggressive country who cares little about human rights.
    _____________________________________________
    I WILL NOT INSULT YOUR INTELLIGENCE BUT YOUR LACK OF INTELLECT IS FAIR GAME

    Remember the axiom of big government bureaucrats: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. When, finally, under the crushing weight of taxes and regulation, it stops moving, subsidize it. Going Postal

  24. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 17 2003
    Location
    Hollywood
    Age
    28
    Posts
    20,811
    The 1956 war had to do with France and England pressuring Israel to take over Sinai for their interests, as well as with Egypt threatening and attacking Israel around that time.

    Having said that, Israel has returned it very shortly then, and Egypt lost it again in 1967 because they attacked Israel.

  25. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 17 2003
    Location
    Hollywood
    Age
    28
    Posts
    20,811
    Quote Originally Posted by antiquity View Post
    Like I said, It proves that Israel is an aggressive country who cares little about human rights.
    It's absolutely irrelevant even if it was true. When you make a deal, you make a deal, regardless if that country happens to be whatever, so once again, stop bullshiting.

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. OBama REgime Talkin' Points "DAy One" Exposed
    By Šñøü†ê® in forum Political Debate
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-04-2010, 12:48 PM
  2. Iron Maiden's "The Trooper" on bass
    By Bo in forum General Hobbies: Outdoors, Home & Garden, Artistic Expression
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-28-2010, 01:52 AM
  3. Saddam rules with "Iron Fist" (not Johnson)
    By Shawn in forum The Lighter Side
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-23-2004, 10:08 AM
  4. Fun and Games in Haiti: old style "regime change"
    By suicidalmarchingband in forum In The News
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 02-20-2004, 07:35 PM
  5. The "Commitment Conversation"
    By jillianjiggs in forum Relationships, Dating, Mars & Venus
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-20-2003, 04:37 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts