Are you scared of what will happen when Obama loses in 2012?

[Dick Tator]

Can you imagine all the complete chimpouts happening all over the country at once?

[Dreamy]

'chimpouts"?

[Dick Tator]

'chimpouts"?

It's the commonly used term for when black people act violent for no real reason, usually in mobs.

[Dreamy]

It's the commonly used term for when black people act violent for no real reason, usually in mobs.

I think deep down all thinking people want him gone.

[Freedom&Liberty]

By now they know that Obama was all talk and isn't doing shit for them anyway.

[Dreamy]

By now they know that Obama was all talk and isn't doing shit for them anyway.

I wonder if that chick ever got her Obama money?

[Dick Tator]

I think deep down all thinking people want him gone.

I agree yet stand by my original question as persons who engage in chimpouts aren't thinking persons.

[Lulu]

I'm really more scared if he wins in 2012. We can't afford 4 more years of unbridled spending...or rogue tactics in other countries, or rogue department heads who green light tactics like Fast & furious, etc. etc.

[queenlillian1962]

Can you imagine all the complete chimpouts happening all over the country at once?

Well of course it he loses it will be because American are Racist and not due to the fact Obama Sucks!

[DamnYankee]

I'm really more scared if he wins in 2012. We can't afford 4 more years of unbridled spending...or rogue tactics in other countries, or rogue department heads who green light tactics like Fast & furious, etc. etc.

Corruption in other words.

[Guido]

Can you imagine all the complete chimpouts happening all over the country at once?

As far as the Owners are concerned, it matters not whether "Obama" or "Romney" is the PR man because each of those two cardboard cutouts knows which side of his bread is buttered and which is not.

As far as the rabble are concerned -- who the fuck cares about the rabble? The rabble is composed of unpersons -- raw material, which is briefly used and then discarded. Let them "chimp out". Let them sob, cray, wail, moan, protest, yell and scream -- it's all OK because they don't really exist in any significant way.

[Dreamy]

As far as the Owners are concerned, it matters not whether "Obama" or "Romney" is the PR man because each of those two cardboard cutouts knows which side of his bread is buttered and which is not.

As far as the rabble are concerned -- who the fuck cares about the rabble? The rabble is composed of unpersons -- raw material, which is briefly used and then discarded. Let them "chimp out". Let them sob, cray, wail, moan, protest, yell and scream -- it's all OK because they don't really exist in any significant way.

Do you have anyone in the current race you support Guido?

[Guido]

Do you have anyone in the current race you support Guido?

Here's how I look at it:

A vote for anyone other than Ron Paul is a vote for gratuitous murder and mayem. We know, with one-hundred percent certainty, that Obama or Romney will continue slaughtering innocent people, destroying property, maiming children, and generally destroying lives on a massive scale in poor countries for reasons such as: to further enrich military contractors, to get re-elected, to advance the careers of officers and bureaucrats at all levels of the military industries, to divert peoples' attention from the large-scale theft that constitutes "domestic policy" and so on.

So one might consider voting for Obama over Romney because Obama might possibly delay the destruction of the Social Security system, for example, but is that really a good reason to vote for murder and mayhem?

Not for anyone with sound moral sense.

So, if I were going to vote, I would consider a vote for Ron Paul, but I almost certainly won't vote.

[Dreamy]

Here's how I look at it:

A vote for anyone other than Ron Paul is a vote for gratuitous murder and mayem. We know, with one-hundred percent certainty, that Obama or Romney will continue slaughtering innocent people, destroying property, maiming children, and generally destroying lives on a massive scale in poor countries for reasons such as: to further enrich military contractors, to get re-elected, to advance the careers of officers and bureaucrats at all levels of the military industries, to divert peoples' attention from the large-scale theft that constitutes "domestic policy" and so on.

So one might consider voting for Obama over Romney because Obama might possibly delay the destruction of the Social Security system, for example, but is that really a good reason to vote for murder and mayhem?

Not for anyone with sound moral sense.

So, if I were going to vote, I would consider a vote for Ron Paul, but I almost certainly won't vote.

I am also leaning toward Paul or no vote or perhaps a pissed off write in if Paul does not get nominated. None of the current group of puppets (Paul excluded) will get my vote. Not that my vote matters much in Mass. but it matters to me.

[El Mojado]

Obama cannot lose because he has the support of all minorities in America.

If by some supernatural and extraordinary occurrence he should lose, black and Hispanic people would stage violent riots and destroy the country. Also the International World Court would declare him the victor by popular demand and keep him in office.

You gringo bumpkins better make sure Obama wins.

Gracias

[Dreamy]

Sock report card-D