Science Disproves Evolution

[Malcolm Wright]

Thanks Optimus - you are kind, however this is no thread hijack.
These popsicles hold important insight into our naive adoption of evolution theory. The recipes are very topical. Combined with Pahu's Big Bang cut and pastes, they present compelling evidence that Pahu is nuts.

M

[trgfbv]

Agreed. I too am strangely drawn to their cool, green liquorness.
My attraction to them did not evolve: I saw them, and the attraction was there instantly, with no build up or anything vaguely resembling evolution. Darwin was so wrong. Evolution is mere speculation caused by green popsicle virginity.

M

Darwin was not wrong. You EVOLVED the hormones that meditate your attraction go Popsicles.

Ask any Australopithecus Arfarensis about their opinion of Popsicles and, I theorize, that 98% of them would regard you with a blank stare. Of course I do know that my Theory would be subject to testing through falsification.

[Malcolm Wright]

Darwin was not wrong. You EVOLVED the hormones that meditate your attraction go Popsicles.

Ask any Australopithecus Arfarensis about their opinion of Popsicles and, I theorize, that 98% of them would regard you with a blank stare. Of course I do know that my Theory would be subject to testing through falsification.

Happily there is no greater comfort, after finding one's pet theory to be utterly falsified, than a nice, cool, ice-cool green popsicle. So there are no losers in this thread. Only popsicle winners of popsicle goodness.

M

[trgfbv]

Happily there is no greater comfort, after finding one's pet theory to be utterly falsified, than a nice, cool, ice-cool green popsicle. So there are no losers in this thread. Only popsicle winners of popsicle goodness.

M

That you have not noticed any losers on this thread prompts me to compliment your Rodney King-ish "get-along" nature.

[Malcolm Wright]

That you have not noticed any losers on this thread prompts me to compliment your Rodney King-ish "get-along" nature.

If evolution were a reality, you would have evolved with green popsicles sprouting from your arms, ever icy, ever delicious, ever oh-so nutritious.

As an aside, Rodney King didn't want to get along. He wanted his popsicle, and when he didn't get it he got very very mad. Sadly, the officers that beat him were also suffering from popsicle rage. It just goes to show what can happen when we deviate from the Path.

M

[Misteria]

Green is my fave color

[Misteria]

So broccolli has hope yet? you know the gassy emisions ?

[Malcolm Wright]

So broccolli has hope yet? you know the gassy emisions ?

I am not aware of this controversy. Could you provide details?

[Pahu]

Big Bang? 11


If a big bang occurred, what caused the bang? Stars with enough mass become black holes, so not even light can escape their enormous gravity. How then could anything escape the trillions upon trillions of times greater gravity caused by concentrating all the universe’s mass in a “cosmic egg” that existed before a big bang (u)?

u. One might also ask where the “cosmic egg” came from if there was a big bang. Of course, the question is unanswerable. Pushing any origin explanation back far enough raises similar questions—all scientifically untestable. Thus, the question of ultimate origins is not a purely scientific matter. What science can do is test possible explanations once the starting assumptions are given. For example, if a tiny “cosmic egg” (having all the mass in the universe) existed, it should not explode, based on present understanding. Claiming that some strange, new phenomenon caused an explosion (or inflation) is philosophical speculation. While such speculation may or may not be correct, it is not science. [See “How Can the Study of Creation Be Scientific?” ]

[From “In the Beginning” by Walt Brown]

[trgfbv]

So broccolli has hope yet? you know the gassy emisions ?

Do you like broccoli as a food or as a big bang?

[Mrmint]

Do you like broccoli as a food or as a big bang?

Big bang broccoli is cooler

[Malcolm Wright]

If opposed, the cosmic egg and the cosmic broccoli duel in the heavens, like food stuff titans trying to smite each other through the eons. Of course one could wonder what an egg could smite a broccoli with, being all round and smooth and stuff. Likewise, one could ask oneself what damage a Broccoli could do, being so rubbery. That is precisely why the battle continues to this day, since the dawn of time.

Pahu is not aware of the Secret Doctrine of the Broccoli - and only sites references to the cosmic egg. This shows that he is, at best, only seeing half the picture necessary to understanding the origins of the universe.

M

[Pahu]

Big Bang? 12


For decades, big bang theorists said that the amount of mass in a rapidly expanding universe must be enough to prevent all matter from flying apart; otherwise, matter could not come together to form stars and galaxies. Estimates of the universe’s actual mass always fell far short of that minimum amount. This “missing mass” is often called dark matter, because no one could see it or even detect it. Actually, “missing mass” had to be “created” to preserve the big bang theory. The media’s frequent reference to “dark matter” enshrined it in the public’s consciousness, much like the supposed “missing link” between apes and man.

The big bang has struck again by devising something new and imaginary to support the theory. Here’s why. The big bang theory predicts that the universe’s expansion must be slowing, just as a ball thrown upward must slow as it moves away from the Earth. For decades, cosmologists tried to measure this deceleration. The shocking result is now in—and the answer has been rechecked in many ways. The universe’s expansion is not decelerating; it is accelerating (v)! Therefore, to protect the theory, something must again be invented. Some energy source that counteracts gravity must continually accelerate stars and galaxies away from each other. This energy, naturally enough, is called dark energy.

v. “Three years ago, observations of distant, exploding stars blew to smithereens some of astronomers’ most cherished ideas about the universe [the big bang theory]. To piece together an updated theory, they’re now thinking dark thoughts about what sort of mystery force may be contorting the cosmos.

“According to the standard view of cosmology, the once infinitesimal universe has ballooned in volume ever since its fiery birth in the Big Bang, but the mutual gravitational tug of all the matter in the cosmos has gradually slowed that expansion.

“In 1998, however, scientists reported that a group of distant supernovas were dimmer, and therefore farther from Earth, than the standard theory indicated. It was as if, in the billion or so years it took for the light from these exploded stars to arrive at Earth, the space between the stars and our planet had stretched out more than expected. That would mean that cosmic expansion has somehow sped up, not slowed down. Recent evidence has only firmed up that bizarre result.” Ron Cowen, “A Dark Force in the Universe,” Science News, Vol. 159, 7 April 2001, p. 218.

“Not only don’t we see the universe slowing down; we see it speeding up.” Adam Riess, as quoted by James Glanz, “Astronomers See a Cosmic Antigravity Force at Work,” Science, Vol. 279, 27 February 1998, p. 1298.

“In one of the great results of twentieth century science, NSF-funded astronomers have shown both that the universe does not contain enough matter in the universe to slow the expansion, and that the rate of expansion actually increases with distance. Why? Nobody knows yet.” National Science Foundation Advertisement, “Astronomy: Fifty Years of Astronomical Excellence,” Discover, September 2000, p. 7.

“The expansion of the universe was long believed to be slowing down because of the mutual gravitational attraction of all the matter in the universe. We now know that the expansion is accelerating and that whatever caused the acceleration (dubbed “dark energy”) cannot be Standard Model physics.” Gordon Kane, “The Dawn of Physics Beyond the Standard Model,” Scientific American, Vol. 288, June 2003, p. 73.

[From “In the Beginning” by Walt Brown]

[Malcolm Wright]

Big Bang? 12


Bla bla bla

[From “In the Beginning” by Walt Brown]

If anyone is reading Pahu's Big Bang posts, please thank this post.
I'm curious to see if anyone is reading them at all.

M.

[Malcolm Wright]

If anyone is reading the popsicle posts, please thank this post.

M

[Capricorn]

Big Bang? 11


If a big bang occurred, what caused the bang? Stars with enough mass become black holes, so not even light can escape their enormous gravity. How then could anything escape the trillions upon trillions of times greater gravity caused by concentrating all the universe’s mass in a “cosmic egg” that existed before a big bang (u)?

u. One might also ask where the “cosmic egg” came from if there was a big bang. Of course, the question is unanswerable. Pushing any origin explanation back far enough raises similar questions—all scientifically untestable. Thus, the question of ultimate origins is not a purely scientific matter. What science can do is test possible explanations once the starting assumptions are given. For example, if a tiny “cosmic egg” (having all the mass in the universe) existed, it should not explode, based on present understanding. Claiming that some strange, new phenomenon caused an explosion (or inflation) is philosophical speculation. While such speculation may or may not be correct, it is not science. [See “How Can the Study of Creation Be Scientific?” ]

[From “In the Beginning” by Walt Brown]

Where you are going wrong is not understanding the Big Bang Theory in the first place. Big Bang was not an explosion - it was sudden expansion of space (and beginning of time) from a singularity.

[trgfbv]

Where you are going wrong is not understanding the Big Bang Theory in the first place. Big Bang was not an explosion - it was sudden expansion of space (and beginning of time) from a singularity.

Talking science with a religious nut is a futile endeavor. Focus on the Popsicle content for a more satisfying exchange of ideas.

[Malcolm Wright]

Back due to popular request (or a deep and abiding fear of the alternative): the Popsicle Bulletin.

Before Blue Milk, before Ewok Jerky, before that frog thing that Jabba eats, before even Yoda's stew, the main food of the Jedi was ice pops! Of course, a true Jedi made their ice pop holder themselves. Most Jedi used juice to make their ice pops, as it was healthy and nourished the mind and soul, but some preferred alcoholic beverages. These souls became the Sith (named after a brand of Alderaanian vodka), and you know the rest. It's time to make yourself a treat from long, long ago with your very own Star Wars Lightsaber Ice Pops!

http://www.thinkgeek.com/interests/looflirpa/e8b8/

Christianisty VS Jedi

The spiritually significant ancestral origin of the light saber: the so-called light saber ice pop, provides valuable insight into the subtle ways of the Force - insight that could lead us to finally understand the origins of the universe. The more light saber ice pops we eat, the greater our understanding. So get cracking folks!

M.

[Misteria]

I admit I luv this thread

[Malcolm Wright]

The popsicles of this thread have some luv for you too Misteria!
Pahu - this is your cue to make a suggestive play on the words Big Bang...

M