Google
 

View Full Version : CIA officer fired after admitting leak


caddis
04-24-2006, 09:13 AM
By Robert Windrem and Andrea Mitchell
NBC News
Updated: 7:41 p.m. ET April 21, 2006
WASHINGTON - In a rare occurrence, the CIA fired an officer who acknowledged giving classified information to a reporter, NBC News learned Friday.

The officer flunked a polygraph exam before being fired on Thursday and is now under investigation by the Justice Department, NBC has learned.

Intelligence sources tell NBC News the accused officer, Mary McCarthy, worked in the CIA's inspector general's office and had worked for the National Security Council under the Clinton and and George W. Bush administrations.

The leak pertained to stories on the CIA’s rumored secret prisons in Eastern Europe, sources told NBC. The information was allegedly provided to Dana Priest of the Washington Post, who wrote about CIA prisons in November and was awarded a Pulitzer Prize on Monday for her reporting.

Sources said the CIA believes McCarthy had more than a dozen unauthorized contacts with Priest. Information about subjects other than the prisons may have been leaked as well.

All CIA employees are required to sign a secrecy agreement upon being hired stating they are prohibited from discussing classified information with anyone not cleared to receive the material.
The Washington Post report caused an international uproar, and government officials have said it did significant damage to relationships between the U.S. and allied intelligence agencies.

CIA Director Porter Goss told the Senate in February that leaks to the media had damaged national security. Subsequently, Goss ordered an internal investigation on leaks involving classified security data.

This leak is not linked to the recent scandal in the CIA involving undercover agent Valerie Plame’s identity’s being revealed, NBC reported.

The NSA and other agencies had requested the probe, sources told NBC.


http://msnbc.msn.com/id/12423825/
How come she wasn't charged with anything? To leak information because something illegal is being done is one thing...It is something that should be applauded. To leak information because you don't agree with the politics is not excusable.

veracity00
04-24-2006, 10:24 AM
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/12423825/
How come she wasn't charged with anything?

The article stated that the " no-Justice Dept" is looking into it.

To leak information because something illegal is being done is one thing...It is something that should be applauded.

Wasn't there torture being practiced at these CIA secret prisons? She blew the CIA's cover on an illicit extraordinary rendition program as far as I know.

To leak information because you don't agree with the politics is not excusable.

The politics of what?

caddis
04-24-2006, 05:40 PM
The article stated that the " no-Justice Dept" is looking into it.Then I suppose we should expect charges soon



Wasn't there torture being practiced at these CIA secret prisons? She blew the CIA's cover on an illicit extraordinary rendition program as far as I know. Was there a law broken by anyone? (other then her) She blew CIA's cover...period. Did she confront her superiors with her reservations about any legalities? She leaked classified information to damage the current administration

The politics of what? It's fact she was a CLinton admin holdover (hired by Sandy the Burgler at one time), it's also clear she gave at least $7500 to Democrats/kerry last election. If she doesn't the like policy then she can quit her job or wait it out for a different group of leaders that will change it. It is not her job to expose secrets.

Google