Criminal
02-20-2006, 08:34 AM
I have been wondering about what Karl Marx really meant. I do not think that he was really anti-religious as much as he was recognizing that religions of the world have been used historically by authorities to secure their power and positions.
Case in point, the Jewish faith, which Marx undoubtedly knew well opposed any opposition to the status quo unless it was a case of outright oppression. Christianity, especially after the time of Constintine, was a religion of state which supported serfdom and slavery. Hinduism preached reincarnation as part of its emphasis on the caste system which kept a solid hold on Indian society.
In the rare instances when religious figures led popular revolutions, such as Girolamo Savonarola, the hiarchy of the Church usually refuted such leaders.
Any thoughts on this?
Case in point, the Jewish faith, which Marx undoubtedly knew well opposed any opposition to the status quo unless it was a case of outright oppression. Christianity, especially after the time of Constintine, was a religion of state which supported serfdom and slavery. Hinduism preached reincarnation as part of its emphasis on the caste system which kept a solid hold on Indian society.
In the rare instances when religious figures led popular revolutions, such as Girolamo Savonarola, the hiarchy of the Church usually refuted such leaders.
Any thoughts on this?