Google
 

View Full Version : More Breakage in Antarctica


Manu
05-22-2002, 04:04 PM
Another new iceberg has broken away from Antarctica, the National Ice Center reported Tuesday.

The berg named D-17 broke off from the Lazarev Ice Shelf, a large sheet of glacial ice and snow extending from the Antarctic mainland into the southeastern Weddell Sea.

The new iceberg is 34.5 miles long and 6.9 miles wide, about the same size as St. Lucia Island in the Caribbean Sea. It was observed on an image collected by the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program.

Icebergs are named for the area quadrant of Antarctica where they appear. D-17 is the 17th berg reported since record keeping began in 1976.

Just last week, an iceberg nearly as large as the Chesapeake Bay _ called C-19 -- broke away from Antarctica, where it is late summer.

In March, another giant berg broke free in an adjacent area. Named B-22, it measured 2,120 square miles, bigger than the state of Delaware. Also in March, a large floating ice shelf in Antarctica collapsed.

However, new measurements indicate the ice in parts of Antarctica is thickening, reversing earlier estimates that the sheet was melting.

Scientists reported in January that new flow measurements for the Ross ice streams indicate some of their movement has slowed or halted, allowing the ice to thicken. Researchers don't know if the thickening is merely part of some short-term fluctuation or represents a reversal of the ice's long retreat.

That report, in the journal Science, came less than a week after a paper in Nature reported that Antarctica's harsh desert valleys _ long considered a bellwether for global climate change -- have grown noticeably cooler since the mid-1980s.

The National Ice Center, based in Suitland, Md., provides worldwide ice analyses and tracking to assist the military and private shippers. It is a joint operation of the Navy, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and Coast Guard.

www.cnn.com

The Frog
05-22-2002, 04:21 PM
Sounds like it's redistrubuting itself what with it thickening in one part and edges breaking off elsewhere.

B-22, then c-19, then D-17.

My money's on E-15 being the next one.







Did I just hear someone shout 'You sank my Battleship!'??

Lowtide
05-22-2002, 04:32 PM
The evidence suggests that this may be part of a larger cycle; there's been a great flood before.

Sounds like mother earth has seen quite a few bad days in her time.

86Dude
05-22-2002, 04:50 PM
As long it isn' breaking off from land, no big deal.

Unrepresented
05-22-2002, 05:01 PM
I'm not educated enough in the ecology of the earth to understand the significance of this event, although I can come to several conclusions. I'm just glad that there's people who monitor this sorta thing.

The good news is barring any major disasters, the warming of antarctica won't harm any of us during our life times. It might suck to be the future generations though.

Justin

The Frog
05-22-2002, 05:02 PM
Originally posted by 86Dude
As long it isn' breaking off from land, no big deal.

True enough. It's mass was already in the water, so it changed nothing, waterline-wise.

Originally posted by Unrepresented


The good news is barring any major disasters, the warming of antarctica won't harm any of us during our life times. It might suck to be the future generations though.

Justin

It's not warming, per se. Note the part of the article that said other parts of the ice shelf were getting thicker.

Manu
05-22-2002, 05:49 PM
Well, the earth WAS in a 'mini ice age' the past few hundred of years...and we're currently leaving it...along with chifting magnetic poles...

Kraw
05-23-2002, 07:59 AM
Originally posted by TheFrog


True enough. It's mass was already in the water, so it changed nothing, waterline-wise.



It's not warming, per se. Note the part of the article that said other parts of the ice shelf were getting thicker.



see, that is my thought too. if they mass of the frozen ice is already in the water, then the water line wouldn't change if it melted, right? Then what is the big deal with the icecaps melting?

The Frog
05-23-2002, 09:30 AM
Well, since ice and water take up differing volumes, I think the conversion of ice to water was the concern. Or Ice from actual ground (not in water) falling/sliding in to the oceans.

I don't think it's anything to worry about.

Manu
05-23-2002, 12:20 PM
Well, I think the issue...if this is an 'ice ledge' and suspended above water, its mass may NOT be in the water line. But, that is a miniscule addition.

The fact is that there is a repositioning of the ice, a melting in some areas and a thickening in others...

That is being caused for a reason, and that cna have affects on local ecosystems, and further on global weather patterns if there is more than just localized warming.

Google