A memo is circulating around to Republicans in Washington holding out hope in the face of the Party's collapsing prospects that there will another major terrorist attack, boosting morale and attempting to hold the troops together behind the White house. They need one, so it's going to happen, and before the mid-term elections next year. They needed one on 9/11, and they got one, and we know God speaks to George W. and will miraculously arrange one for him ...

A confidential memo circulating among senior Republican leaders suggests that a new attack by terrorists on U.S. soil could reverse the sagging fortunes of President George W. Bush as well as the GOP and "restore his image as a leader of the American people."

The closely-guarded memo lays out a list of scenarios to bring the Republican party back from the political brink, including a devastating attack by terrorists that could “validate” the President’s war on terror and allow Bush to “unite the country” in a “time of national shock and sorrow.”

The memo says such a reversal in the President's fortunes could keep the party from losing control of Congress in the 2006 midterm elections.

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/111405_world_stories.shtml#1

Given all the ties the Republicans have with terrorist groups, it's a piece of cake for them to set up another one, and we know they're criminals and vermin and perfectly capable of it. It's in their playbook. This memo is just their way of telling their soldiers to hold the line, help is on the way.

I'm not familiar with the source, are they reliable?

Not another 9/11. They'd need a less then 9/11, say 800-1000 people dead. Then they could be like 'see, under our leaderhsip not as many people die'. If there were another 9/11, it would **** them over horribly, and they have to realize this. It would be laid out in bold letters that the war in Iraq wasnt the answer, and despite Bush's promises of security, republicans couldnt deliver. Oh, I'm sure they'd absolutly love a small attack where maybe they even catch part of it 'due to inteligence and the system currently in place', but a full out 9/11 would pry drop bush to a cool 20%.

Given all the ties the Republicans have with terrorist groups, it's a piece of cake for them to set up another one, and we know they're criminals and vermin and perfectly capable of it. It's in their playbook. This memo is just their way of telling their soldiers to hold the line, help is on the way.

ROFLMAO

The politics of the playground.

Dont tell me, man never landed on the Moon either right?

ROFLMAO

The politics of the playground.

Dont tell me, man never landed on the Moon either right?

The mods let those f--king idiots 'rubicon', 'Thumper', and the moron 'Feenix' spam-post much crazier crap. Let's take it to a new level.


Do you have a source or a link that proves my post wrong?

The mods let those f--king idiots 'rubicon', 'Thumper', and the moron 'Feenix' spam-post much crazier crap. Let's take it to a new level.

What other people do or do not post is up to them. It is hardly an excuse for you to post simplistic drivel.

You dont like the Republicans so blame them for 9/11, blame them for terrorism, hell call them paedophiles if you wish. It's not exactly a sophisticated argument though is it.

But then I see you as either a particularly unsophisticated person, very young, or just someone looking to be angry about something.

But I am willing to be proved wrong.

Do you have a source or a link that proves my post wrong?

No.

Can you prove you are not a terrorist sypmpathiser, or a paedophile, or a retard? No you cant, difficult to prove a negative wouldnt you say.

Not another 9/11. They'd need a less then 9/11, say 800-1000 people dead. Then they could be like 'see, under our leaderhsip not as many people die'. If there were another 9/11, it would **** them over horribly, and they have to realize this. It would be laid out in bold letters that the war in Iraq wasnt the answer, and despite Bush's promises of security, republicans couldnt deliver. Oh, I'm sure they'd absolutly love a small attack where maybe they even catch part of it 'due to inteligence and the system currently in place', but a full out 9/11 would pry drop bush to a cool 20%.

You're assuming their voter base is smart enough to see through it. They aren't for the most part, and the ones who are smart enough are cashing in on the war and hoping for the same thing. Their patriotism is based solely on making money off the war and the scams.

Dont tell me, man never landed on the Moon either right?

How exactly did that camera on the moon pan up, dogberry? :confused:

Also, Im inclined to agree. This is pretty much less radical then most extreme right wing racist christian rhetoric bull**** that this board constantly gets flooded with. I commend Oberon for posting something that levels it out.

You're assuming their voter base is smart enough to see through it. They aren't for the most part, and the ones who are smart enough are cashing in on the war and hoping for the same thing. Their patriotism is based solely on making money off the war and the scams.

Hmm.. good point... I keep giving the general voting public about 100% more credit then they deserve.

'What? Him there's that a flip-floping guy?! Oh, an whas that? People who's never actually witim in Viatname say he dint really surve?! Well to hell wit dat varmint! Now gimme my $300 check dar, Mr. Geoorge!'

It's far less crazy, and they're more than capable of doing it. They have no principles, and few of their voting base have any, either.

The memo circulates as the results of the elections last Tuesday have left an already dysfunctional White House in chaos according to reports.

Reports from West Wing insiders say that shouting matches are commonplace and that the blame game escalates into open warfare.

As the GOP scrambles to find a messages that resonates with voters, some in Congress say that control of their party by right-wing extremists have critically injured the health of the Republican Party.

Senator Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania says that he does not want President Bush to help with his campaign.

Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) says of the extremists, “We made our bed with these people. Now it’s the morning after and the hangover hurts like hell.”

http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=116798

"Right wing extremists' are the operative words here, and they aren't coming form the mouths of 'liberals'.

http://www.freemarketnews.com/WorldNews.asp?nid=2016

Free Market News thinks the story has wings and is credible, no 'Lefties' there.

http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7639.shtml

How exactly did that camera on the moon pan up, dogberry? :confused:



Remote control.

I'm not familiar with the source, are they reliable?

Of course it's reliable. It's on all kinds of websites, and I cut and pasted it, and there's a bunch of links to it.

Remote control.

Was the flag remote control too?

Was the flag remote control too?

Are you being serious? You honestly think that we never landed on the moon? what is it about the flag that piqued your curiosity?

Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) says of the extremists, “We made our bed with these people. Now it’s the morning after and the hangover hurts like hell.”


Yep. I could'a told them that five years ago. When they used the ditto-heads to bolster the party, they destroyed it. In the short run, they gained the Congress and the Oval Office, but they turned the GOP into The Party of Stupid Crazy People.

It was an obvious and an idiotic move. And the funny thing is, they're not even remotely loyal people. They'll bail on the party and leave it a fraction of what it used to be.

Are you being serious? You honestly think that we never landed on the moon? what is it about the flag that piqued your curiosity?

Im joking. But its a common argument for the moon hoax--the flag was waving.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods

They've tried to do it before..

Yep. I could'a told them that five years ago. When they used the ditto-heads to bolster the party, they destroyed it. In the short run, they gained the Congress and the Oval Office, but they turned the GOP into The Party of Stupid Crazy People.

It was an obvious and an idiotic move. And the funny thing is, they're not even remotely loyal people. They'll bail on the party and leave it a fraction of what it used to be.

Yes. And it is coming close to destroying the country as well. Some of the older conservatives felt the same way when the wave of DixieCrat vermin like Strom Thurmond flooded into the Party in the 1960's.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods

They've tried to do it before..

Yes, and you would think morons would be able to pick up on the pattern, since it's been going on at least since the 'Great' Teddy Roosevelt's using the fake 'Maine attack' as an excuse to take over the Caribbean for National City Bank.

I doubt if the repubs would be stupid enough to circulate a memo like that, but who knows ?

I think another "9-11 lite" will remain a secret wet dream for the neocons and chickenhawks who put their party before their country

Also, Im inclined to agree. This is pretty much less radical then most extreme right wing racist christian rhetoric bull**** that this board constantly gets flooded with. I commend Oberon for posting something that levels it out.

I see, the the other side post hysterical nonsense so to balance it up you post hysterical nonsense.

Politics at it's finest.

A memo is circulating around to Republicans in Washington holding out hope in the face of the Party's collapsing prospects that there will another major terrorist attack, boosting morale and attempting to hold the troops together behind the White house. They need one, so it's going to happen, and before the mid-term elections next year. They needed one on 9/11, and they got one, and we know God speaks to George W. and will miraculously arrange one for him ...



http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/111405_world_stories.shtml#1

Given all the ties the Republicans have with terrorist groups, it's a piece of cake for them to set up another one, and we know they're criminals and vermin and perfectly capable of it. It's in their playbook. This memo is just their way of telling their soldiers to hold the line, help is on the way.

Wouldn't surprise me a bit. I touched on it after Bush' speech in September when he practically came out and stated that was his plan.

http://www.discussanything.com/forums/showthread.php?t=80330

Of course it's reliable. It's on all kinds of websites, and I cut and pasted it, and there's a bunch of links to it.Then why didn't Doug Thompson put a copy of the memo on his website? Please post the memo, not a story telling us it exists.

I demand a copy of the original memo or this thread is nothing more than more leftist propaganda and hearsay. :mad:

I thought you liked hearsay and propaganda? :|

It sounds to me that you, Oberon, are the one that wants a terrorist attack to ratify your failed hypothesis.

It sounds to me that you, Oberon, are the one that wants a terrorist attack to ratify your failed hypothesis.

Good point.

Sickening, Oberon. :nonono:

Only the Right has anything to gain from such a horrendous thing and since the primary mantra of the Right is to retain political power to make even huger and huger profits for the elite regardless of any kind of ethical standard, then Oberon's theory is well-based.

Only the Right has anything to gain from such a horrendous thing and since the primary mantra of the Right is to retain political power to make even huger and huger profits for the elite regardless of any kind of ethical standard, then Oberon's theory is well-based.

How is it that the "right" has something to gain from this? They have more to gain, not only in 06 but 08, in showing that it was their policies that prevented it. And the left hasn't tried to retain political power? They don't want to increase their power so that they can continue with their welfare plantation policies?

Does Haliburton ring a bell? Big government spending on defense is an interest of the Right. Lots of tax payers loot to hand around to large stock-holders of those lucrative defense contractors, isn't there? Most of it no-bid and without any kind of accountability and of course there are those under the table kickbacks.

My theory is that Bush doesn't want to "win" any war. He simply wants to engage us in as many long-term conflicts as he can in hopes that they will last as long as possible so that he may continue to eat cookies out of the cookie jar of Washington, years after it's out of his reach.