This country needs his steady hand and level head during these trying times. His strong leadership is just what we need in the scary world we live in. Ronald Reagan illustrated that we will achieve peace through strength and we need to remember that in these days.

Thank you President Bush for your courageous leadership. Your country owes you a great debt of gratitude.

Flame

Oh boy.

:corn:

OK, who fed the trolls again?

.....The answer is No?

Apparently we've been flamed.

Apparently we've been flamed.

ooooooh

well said

whos george bush?

*shakes head* This is a sad day for me. First my mum makes me eat a zinc losenge and now someone thinks George Bush is good...?!

I now must wash out my mouth because of the horrible taste.

Thank you President Bush for your courageous leadership

"Let the nice man show you your very own room, see how nice and soft the walls are ?

Now make sure to wear this helmet at all times!"

Thank you President Bush for your courageous leadership. Your country owes you a great debt of gratitude.

Flame


lmao!!!!! that really explains the 36% approval rating :eek3: :nice: I wager to guess that chimpanzee who won the vote in brazil along with the 18 year old mayor have a higher approval rating

that really explains the 36% approval rating I wager to guess that chimpanzee who won the vote in brazil along with the 18 year old mayor have a higher approval rating


Could you imagine the candidate that LOST to the chimp ? Imagine how bad he/she must feel.

How do you explain that one to your friends ?

Could you imagine the candidate that LOST to the chimp ?

Wasn't that billionaire John Kerry? ;)

The Chimp has to make a lot more public appearances and have a lot more press conferences if he hopes to achieve a higher approval rating. And he has to make fire some people. But then again, Truman had a lower approval rating at one time apparently.

Well-said :nice:

George Bush is a worthless tool with a good marketing pitch. Carl Rove is the only reason Bush exists politically.

Wasn't that billionaire John Kerry? ;)


*bites snouter*

At first I just put "John Kerry." I then edited it with an adjective for SwiftSloth. :)

George Bush is a worthless tool with a good marketing pitch. Carl Rove is the only reason Bush exists politically.
This place is getting to me - I had a weird as anything dream about being in a boardroom with Bush'n'Rove last night. :(

Long Live President Bush!

This place is getting to me - I had a weird as anything dream about being in a boardroom with Bush'n'Rove last night.

That is a fantasy fulfullment dream which means you are a little strange. :jester:

This thread is blasphemous

That is a fantasy fulfullment dream which means you are a little strange. :jester:
Yes, but you always knew that.... :D

Long Live President Bush!

Die Slow President Bush!

You just have to have a President Bush in the line up to make all the weak presidents in history look good by comparison.

Was wondering why the secret service was on DA this morning, but after reading Joey's post!! :eek7:

No need for unwanted attention like that..

I would have voted for good ole Georgie if it wasn't for his leftist, socialist policies. He forced me to vote for Badnarick. George Bush turned out to be a liberal.

I would have voted for good ole Georgie if it wasn't for his leftist, socialist policies. He forced me to vote for Badnarick. George Bush turned out to be a liberal.

:lol: :rofl:

whos george bush?
The president of the United States, unfortunantly.
I would have voted for good ole Georgie if it wasn't for his leftist, socialist policies. He forced me to vote for Badnarick. George Bush turned out to be a liberal.

:eek3:

You're funny, Dazen. :nice:

:lol: :rofl:


Laughing with you....

The president of the United States, unfortunantly.
:rolleyes:
Greatest president evar!!!

You're funny, Dazen. Contra is certainly a man with his head in the right place :nice:

:rolleyes:
Greatest president evar!!!

I hope you're joking...



Contra is certainly a man with his head in the right place :nice:

Generally the ass is not the desired place for one's head... :blas:

I would have voted for good ole Georgie if it wasn't for his leftist, socialist policies. He forced me to vote for Badnarick. George Bush turned out to be a liberal.

George W Bush isnt a liberal.

I hope you're joking...
Ok, maybe not best EVER, but best since regan :shrug:
I'm waiting for us to bomb the @%^#$ out of Mecca :nice:



Generally the ass is not the desired place for one's head... :blas: Indeed, which is a good reason why it's not there :nice:

Ok, maybe not best EVER, but best since regan :shrug:
I'm waiting for us to bomb the @%^#$ out of Mecca :nice:



Greatest and Bush shouldn't ever be used in the same sentence. Worst ever is far more appropriate. No other president has done more damage to this nation in so short a time. In my book damaging the country isn't considered a "great" thing, not even good.

And why do you wnt to "bomb the **** out of Mecca"? That certainly doesn't sound very Christian to me? Would Jesus firebomb inocent men, women, and children? In fact, that sounds like something Osama Bin Laden would say. Are we becoming the monsters we are fighting?

Indeed, which is a good reason why it's not there :nice:

Anybody who thinks fascism is fine and dandy and great system definitely has their head up their behind, sorry, there is no more evil system on this planet...

Generally the ass is not the desired place for one's head... :blas:

True, otherwise you'd end up having to deal with issues such as this:

http://www.discussanything.com/forums/showthread.php?t=83420

Anybody who thinks fascism is fine and dandy and great system definitely has their head up their behind, sorry, there is no more evil system on this planet... On MOST issues, fascism not being one of them :rolleyes:

Laughing with you....

:lol: :rofl:

Baiting, pure and simple.

True, otherwise you'd end up having to deal with issues such as this:

http://www.discussanything.com/forums/showthread.php?t=83420

:yikes:

Um, wow, I laughed and gagged through that one...


On MOST issues, fascism not being one of them :rolleyes:

Fascism not being one of them what?


Baiting, pure and simple.
:rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Laughing at your assertion that Bush is a socialist and a liberal is not baiting.

Laughing at your assertion that Bush is a socialist and a liberal is not baiting.

Yes it is.

In regards to economics, Bush is so far to the left he would make Leon Trotsky blush.

Yes it is.

In regards to economics, Bush is so far to the left he would make Leon Trotsky blush.

He spends plenty, but not on liberal ideals. He spends on killing, and giving corporations a foot up while putting money in the pockets of former business friends and family.

Yes it is.

Stop acting ridiculous, posting smilies at something funny somebody says it not even near baiting..


In regards to economics, Bush is so far to the left he would make Leon Trotsky blush.


Hahahahahaaha!!! How is that? Is corporatism leftist??

:yikes:

Um, wow, I laughed and gagged through that one...




Fascism not being one of them what?



:rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Laughing at your assertion that Bush is a socialist and a liberal is not baiting. One of the things he's right on. He's right on a lot of things but not 100% correct on everything. No one is.

One of the things he's right on. He's right on a lot of things but not 100% correct on everything. No one is.


Nobody is 100% correct, but just what is he right on? He's on record as being wrong on virtually everything I can think of..

Baiting, pure and simple.

I just saw this.... well, I don't need to get involved in whatever drama you are trying to create. I posted my honest reaction, if you wanna report it as baiting be my guest.

He's on record as being wrong on virtually everything I can think of..


What a terribly arrogant remark.

Who chose you to be the arbiter of virtually everything?




Yes it is.

In regards to economics, Bush is so far to the left he would make Leon Trotsky blush.

Yes. You are correct.
Bush has increased social spending at a rate that exceeds the past 5 Presidents going back to Lyndon Johnson.

What I find ironic is how the left complains about the deficit, yet they still complain that he isn't spending enough. Then when the responsible people in congress actually propose some spending reductions they cry foul and make wild statements like Republicans want to screw the poor.
(What responsibility do the poor have in all this anyways? Do we need to just keep supporting them without question?)

Then they claim they can manage it better yet they cannot propose any specific alternatives.

He spends plenty, but not on liberal ideals. He spends on killing, and giving corporations a foot up while putting money in the pockets of former business friends and family.

LOL you mean like Bush's Medicare drug benefit program? :rolleyes:

Nobody is 100% correct, but just what is he right on? He's on record as being wrong on virtually everything I can think of..wrong on everything in YOUR mind maybe :)

The stupid in this thread makes my brain hurt.

Apparently, many of you have forgotten to DEBATE THE POSTS, NOT THE POSTERS!!!

Those of you who continue to forget or avoid this will be sent to the time out corner with all the other children. And that corner smells like urine, so you won't like it.

This country needs his steady hand and level head during these trying times. His strong leadership is just what we need in the scary world we live in. Ronald Reagan illustrated that we will achieve peace through strength and we need to remember that in these days.

Thank you President Bush for your courageous leadership. Your country owes you a great debt of gratitude.

Flame
Yes thank you Bush for showing us that the mentally challanged can accomplish anything, including becomming President.... as long as their daddy was President too! :rolleyes:

And that corner smells like urine, so you won't like it.


Sorry about that, Monster. I couldn't hold it any longer.

A five day temp ban is a LOT longer than some people think ...

Yes thank you Bush for showing us that the mentally challanged can accomplish anything, including becomming President.... as long as their daddy was President too! :rolleyes:


:p :rofl:

What a terribly arrogant remark.

Who chose you to be the arbiter of virtually everything?





Yes. You are correct.
Bush has increased social spending at a rate that exceeds the past 5 Presidents going back to Lyndon Johnson.

What I find ironic is how the left complains about the deficit, yet they still complain that he isn't spending enough. Then when the responsible people in congress actually propose some spending reductions they cry foul and make wild statements like Republicans want to screw the poor.
(What responsibility do the poor have in all this anyways? Do we need to just keep supporting them without question?)

Then they claim they can manage it better yet they cannot propose any specific alternatives.


Good points. Also, all of the screaming about the so called "record" deficit is misleading as well. It's about 2.3% of GDP currently, which is relatively insignificant.

This country needs his steady hand and level head during these trying times. His strong leadership is just what we need in the scary world we live in. Ronald Reagan illustrated that we will achieve peace through strength and we need to remember that in these days.

Thank you President Bush for your courageous leadership. Your country owes you a great debt of gratitude.

Flame

Perhaps you should organize a local chapter of Sissies for Bush.

Perhaps you should organize a local chapter of Sissies for Bush.
And perhaps you should re-read the TOS.

Insults are bad, m'kay?

Yes thank you Bush for showing us that the mentally challanged can accomplish anything, including becomming President.... as long as their daddy was President too! :rolleyes:

:lol:

Wasn't that billionaire John Kerry? ;)

The Chimp has to make a lot more public appearances and have a lot more press conferences if he hopes to achieve a higher approval rating. And he has to make fire some people. But then again, Truman had a lower approval rating at one time apparently.

To say nothing of the fact that Congress has a lower approval rating than he does.

Millions of jobs have been created.

Abortion is down.

STD's are down.

Teen pregnancy is down.

Unemployment is the lowest it has been in thirty years.

Home ownership is at 70% of the population, the highest ever.

Libya has renounced it's nuclear ambitions.

Egypt, after 3 decades, will allow contested presidential elections.

Syria is finally out of Lebanon.

Israel has withdrawn from "occupied" territories.

Saudi Arabia has allowed some democracy in local councils.

Europe is listening to the US about concerns of Iranian nuclear ambitions.

Pakistan and India are working together. Nuclear war has been averted.

Iraq has had elections and a new constitution.

Afghanistan is progressing rapidly towards a liberal-style of government.

There have been no terror attacks on America, or its interests since 9/11.

Yes. Thank you President Bush.

Millions of jobs have been created.
Source?
Abortion is down.
Source?
STD's are down.
Not true. Recent news articles show syphillis is down but gonhorrea and chalmidya (sp?) are on the rise.
Teen pregnancy is down.
Source?
Unemployment is the lowest it has been in thirty years.
Source?
Home ownership is at 70% of the population, the highest ever.
And housing markets are at a premium, mortgage rates are rising, and the possibilities for middle income families (of which there are fewer and fewer) to buy houses are decreasing rapidly.
Libya has renounced it's nuclear ambitions.
For the moment.
Egypt, after 3 decades, will allow contested presidential elections.
And this is due exclusively to Bush?
Syria is finally out of Lebanon.
And the U.S. is threatening military action against them. Another invasion. Connection? :|
Israel has withdrawn from "occupied" territories.
That puts them one up on the U.S.
Saudi Arabia has allowed some democracy in local councils.
But they are still ruled by a royal family in place solely because of U.S. military support. Support which, not surprisingly, guarantees Saudi oil flows to the U.S.
Europe is listening to the US about concerns of Iranian nuclear ambitions.
Concerns which the U.S. is seemingly unwilling to make any concessions on.
Pakistan and India are working together. Nuclear war has been averted.
In the wake of a natural catastrophe. I would hesitate to credit this to anyone, least of all the U.S.
Iraq has had elections and a new constitution.
In a war which nearly 70% of the U.S. no longer supports, has yet to produce weapons of mass destruction, has claimed the lives of over 2,000 members of the armed forces, to say nothing of the injured list, is costing the U.S. roughly $1 billion per day, and has no guarantees of ever ending.
Afghanistan is progressing rapidly towards a liberal-style of government.
And still has not produced Osama bin Laden.
There have been no terror attacks on America, or its interests since 9/11.
I could debate semantics with you depending on what you consider an attack on America, but it'd be a fruitless clashing of ideologies. I would like to point out, however, that it appears that what the U.S. has done is redirect the terrorist focal points to other nations. Makes you wonder just how much information the Department of Fatherl--er, Homeland Security is sharing with other nations.

Source?

Source?

Not true. Recent news articles show syphillis is down but gonhorrea and chalmidya (sp?) are on the rise.

Source?

Source?

And housing markets are at a premium, mortgage rates are rising, and the possibilities for middle income families (of which there are fewer and fewer) to buy houses are decreasing rapidly.

For the moment.

And this is due exclusively to Bush?

And the U.S. is threatening military action against them. Another invasion. Connection? :|

That puts them one up on the U.S.

But they are still ruled by a royal family in place solely because of U.S. military support. Support which, not surprisingly, guarantees Saudi oil flows to the U.S.

Concerns which the U.S. is seemingly unwilling to make any concessions on.

In the wake of a natural catastrophe. I would hesitate to credit this to anyone, least of all the U.S.

In a war which nearly 70% of the U.S. no longer supports, has yet to produce weapons of mass destruction, has claimed the lives of over 2,000 members of the armed forces, to say nothing of the injured list, is costing the U.S. roughly $1 billion per day, and has no guarantees of ever ending.

And still has not produced Osama bin Laden.

I could debate semantics with you depending on what you consider an attack on America, but it'd be a fruitless clashing of ideologies. I would like to point out, however, that it appears that what the U.S. has done is redirect the terrorist focal points to other nations. Makes you wonder just how much information the Department of Fatherl--er, Homeland Security is sharing with other nations.


Source? you are on the internet. Dispute them.


Further. Education is much better.

Black ownership of homes is way up.

The gap between white test scores and black test scores are narrowing.

No sources.

Source? you are on the internet. Dispute them.


How about ... You're on the 'Net, you provide support for your claims.

Further. Education is much better.


Better ? In what way ? More expensive for poorer quality results ? That's not my idea of 'better'.

Black ownership of homes is way up.


Racially Divisive. What about other ethnic groups ? White Home Ownership ? Hispanic Home Ownership ? Asian Home Ownership ? You aren't one of those pro-black racists, are you ?

The gap between white test scores and black test scores are narrowing.


Is this because blacks are scoring better ? or because whites are scoring lower ? Or because the tests and the material being tested are both being 'dumbed down' ?

Poorer quality results from the education system.

No sources.

Typical. Make some claim to support your position and then refuse to source it.

Maybe I'll give it a shot.

People from San Francisco are 90% likely to be HIV positive. And are more prone to violent denial of this fact.

No source on that one. And, apparently, Jimmy, none is required.

Die Slow President Bush!

In your dreams. He'll live the rest of his life in total comfort, all expenses and security paid. He'll write books, go on tour. He and his seed will be untouchable, living in a an elitist paradise at the expense of 100's of millions to the U.S. taxpayer.

Egypt, after 3 decades, will allow contested presidential elections.

Syria is finally out of Lebanon.



Saudi Arabia has allowed some democracy in local councils.



Pakistan and India are working together. Nuclear war has been averted.



Yes. Thank you President Bush.
I have no comment on your domestic issues, but how on earth do you credit Dubya for those things above? :confused:

I have no comment on your domestic issues, but how on earth do you credit Dubya for those things above? :confused:

Yeah jj, you owe us an explanation for that. :luck:

Millions of jobs have been created.

Abortion is down.

STD's are down.

Teen pregnancy is down.

Unemployment is the lowest it has been in thirty years.

Home ownership is at 70% of the population, the highest ever.

Libya has renounced it's nuclear ambitions.

Egypt, after 3 decades, will allow contested presidential elections.

Syria is finally out of Lebanon.

Israel has withdrawn from "occupied" territories.

Saudi Arabia has allowed some democracy in local councils.

Europe is listening to the US about concerns of Iranian nuclear ambitions.

Pakistan and India are working together. Nuclear war has been averted.

Iraq has had elections and a new constitution.

Afghanistan is progressing rapidly towards a liberal-style of government.

There have been no terror attacks on America, or its interests since 9/11.

Yes. Thank you President Bush.



Jimmy, you are correct and speaking the truth but the burden does lie upon you to source your facts.

I should add, It won't matter anyways, the left won't believe it even if you provide a source for each point.

I have no comment on your domestic issues, but how on earth do you credit Dubya for those things above? :confused:

Immmediately following 9/11 the Bush Administration heartily engaged the Pakistanis, who up to that point were personas non grata because of Musharaf. The Bush Admin engaged the Indians too and started playing them like they had been playing the west.

Had Pakistan and India gone to war yet again the left would have blamed Bush for it, so it is equally acceptable for me, a partisan, to give him credit.


Bush has pressured Egypt and Saudi Arabia to make their processes more poitically open. Read Natan Sharansky's book.

After Syrians killed the former PM of Lebanon the chiraqi and Bush pressured Syria and both finally started demanding that the UN Resolutions be implemented.



About sources...ToeJam is right is doesn't matter anyways.

Consider my above posts opinions. It isn't like the original intent of this thread was much more than an incitement for lefties to riot.

After Syrians killed the former PM of Lebanon the chiraqi and Bush pressured Syria and both finally started demanding that the UN Resolutions be implemented.

Your assertion about the Syrians killing the former Lebanese PM is unproven. I assume you mean Chalabi, isn't he persona non grata? Or - is he? Consistency isn't one of the BA's strong points.

Well, actually I do have a beef with you crediting Bush for a job well done on domestic issues, take for example the decrease in abortions( if that indeed is true).

How do you credit the president for that?

Wow, back on the original thread posters points. While it is true that the president has had a iron will. His leadership has been a little sketchy. I am referring to the New Orleans response and the fact that in is first term he has used more vacation time than any other president. Plus Domestic issues have been better. The recent Patriot Acts he has enacted have brought forth some interesting reactions. I am reffering to F.I.S.A.'s recent involvement in domestic issues. Such as thier unwarranted searchs of U.S. citizens homes and roveing wiretaps.

No, Insult intended as my name states I remain neutral.

Wow, back on the original thread posters points. While it is true that the president has had a iron will. His leadership has been a little sketchy. I am referring to the New Orleans response and the fact that in is first term he has used more vacation time than any other president. Plus Domestic issues have been better. The recent Patriot Acts he has enacted have brought forth some interesting reactions. I am reffering to F.I.S.A.'s recent involvement in domestic issues. Such as thier unwarranted searchs of U.S. citizens homes and roveing wiretaps.

No, Insult intended as my name states I remain neutral.


I am SO sick of Bush being hammered on the hurricane.

When the Mississippi flooded during the Clinton years, it took him a few days longer than Bush to show up, yet no one whined about it. And they shouldn't have, because he's no more responsible for those floods than Bush is for any hurricanes. The presidents can't really DO anything in a disaster area anyway. They declare a state of emergency to get the funds released, inspect some of the damage, then go home.

NO had many oppurtunities, and offers of help to evacuate tens of thousands of people, yet refused. Amtrack offered trains to carry thousands out free of charge, but were told "No thanks".

The residents were TOLD to leave, that this was not a drill, yet many decided to ride out the storm of their own accord, and snubbed their noses at the numerous warnings they were given. Then, they complained that they weren't rescued fast enough.

To stay in a city which is below sea level during a category 4-5 storm is foolish.

To truck supplies into a flooded city (during the worst natural disaster in our history), is logistically impossible until the waters at least begin to recede. Trucks can't drive in ten feet of water, and niether can trains. That's why the only way to rescue people was by boat or helicopter. The relief effort was a monumental undertaking, and to expect it to done in a few days is ridiculous.

NO was politicized like everything else. This president is blamed for every thing that happens under the sun, yet the city and stae government down there did a dismal job in every area from the top down. many police simply walked off the job. The governer seemed shell shocked, and was absolutely incompetent. The mayor at least tried to convince the residents to leave, yet his words weren't heeded by many. It's no surprise at all that it became an even worse disaster than it needed to be with the lack of real leadership in that state.

Your assertion about the Syrians killing the former Lebanese PM is unproven. I assume you mean Chalabi, isn't he persona non grata? Or - is he? Consistency isn't one of the BA's strong points.

Chalabi is also persona non grata in Lebanon I think. He did some bank fraud and he is an all around "not nice guy."

I was talking about Hariri and the UN said that the Syrians did it.

But listen you and People's Champ, I didn't post this thread, and if you think that it should be responded to with sources, and creditation, or whatever then go for it.

Chalabi is also persona non grata in Lebanon I think. He did some bank fraud and he is an all around "not nice guy."


But listen you and People's Champ, I didn't post this thread, and if you think that it should be responded to with sources, and creditation, or whatever then go for it.
Not to mention Jordan, where he is also wanted for bank fraud... an all round lovely guy! I heard on another board, and from an article by Robert Fisk (who lives in Lebanon) that Syria are not implicated, but I shall do some googling.

Chalabi is also persona non grata in Lebanon I think. He did some bank fraud and he is an all around "not nice guy."

I read that the king of Jordan was asked by Jalal Talabani (Iraq Deputy PM) to pardon Chalabi for bank fraud in Jordan.

But listen you and People's Champ, I didn't post this thread, and if you think that it should be responded to with sources, and creditation, or whatever then go for it.


JJ, no sources needed for the following question: I would like to know in your own words why you feel the president should be credited/commended for the decrease in abortions in the US(if that indeed is true).

I read that the king of Jordan was asked by Jalal Talabani (Iraq Deputy PM) to pardon Chalabi for bank fraud in Jordan.




JJ, no sources needed for the following question: I would like to know in your own words why you feel the president should be credited/commended for the decrease in abortions in the US(if that indeed is true).

The trend for abortions started to decline, generally, in the GHW Bush administration. When Clinton was President he said he wanted to see abortion safe, legal, and rare. Clinton was credited with the decline in abortions amongst other things. For example, just because he signed the bill from the Republican Congress on welfare reform he claimed credit for reforming it. But that was not his position in the campaign. He "triangulated" Republican's Contract with America which was fine with me because I felt that that was the right way to move America forward.

Now when the trend continues to decline why not credit Bush?

I am a Bush supporter and you are not. So you interest will be to minimize his impact and my inclination will be to inflate it.

But all of the things I said were based on facts as reported by groups/orgs like the CDC, the WHO, the Economist, The Wall Street Joournal, CNN, The NY Times, NARAL etc.

There are of course counter examples for everyone. The original point, I think, of Monster, was to just dismiss the post. Which is fine. This thread is a little "fluffy" to say the least.

It is like the little note that Meirs sent Bush about how much she thought he was a great governor.