Google
 

View Full Version : White House: Sharon comments 'unacceptable'


AdamJ
10-05-2001, 11:49 AM
WASHINGTON (CNN) --The White House on Friday said Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's warning to the United States not to "appease" Arabs at Israel's expense is "unacceptable."

President Bush's spokesman Ari Fleischer said the administration's reaction has been relayed to the Israeli Embassy, the National Security Council and the State Department.

"Israel has no stronger friend and ally in the world than the United States," Fleischer told reporters. "President Bush is an especially close friend of Israel. The United States has been working for months to press the parties to end the violence and return to a political dialogue."

Comparing current events to Western acquiescence in 1938 to Nazi Germany's invasion of Czechoslovakia, Sharon said Thursday, "I call on the Western democracies and primarily the leader of the free world, the United States: Do not repeat the dreadful mistake of 1938 when enlightened European democracies decided to sacrifice Czechoslovakia for a convenient temporary solution."

"Do not try to appease the Arabs at our expense," Sharon said. "This is unacceptable to us. Israel will not be Czechoslovakia. Israel will fight terrorism."

"We can only count on ourselves," Sharon said. "From now on, we will count only on ourselves."

He said Israel will take "whatever steps necessary" to protect Israelis from terrorism and accused Palestinians of repeatedly violating the recent cease-fire agreement, reached under pressure from the United States.

"Every effort by us to reach a cease-fire was torpedoed by the Palestinians," he said. "The fire hasn't stopped for a minute."

The U.S. efforts to bring about a cease-fire between Israelis and Palestinians was complicated by its plan to build a broad-based international coalition to fight terrorism in the wake of the September 11 terrorist attacks.

Included in that coalition are a number of Arab and Islamic countries.

In what could be an effort to secure Arab support, Bush said Tuesday that a Palestinian state was always "part of a vision" if Israel's right to exist is respected.

Expanding on those remarks, U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell said, "There has always been a vision in our thinking, as well in previous administrations' thinking, that there would be a Palestinian state that would exist at the same time that the security of the state of Israel was also recognized, guaranteed and accepted by all parties."


Find this article at: http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/10/05/ret.us.sharon/index.html

-------------------------

Looks like Sharon & Bush aren't exactly buddy buddy right now? What do you think about the US's reaction to Sharon's statement.

------------------
"I just bought a Mac to help me design the next Cray." - Seymoure Cray (1925-1996) when was informed that Apple Inc. had recently bought a Cray supercomputer to help them design the next Mac.

"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." - Albert Einstein

"Black holes are where God divided by zero." - Steven Wright

"I have often regretted my speech, never my silence." - Xenocrates

Snouter
10-05-2001, 12:11 PM
It is definitely a significant situation. I am someone who believes that governments are not totally independent, not sincere, and may even participate in "theatric" to fool the people.

On the surface this seems like the Israel government are showing their true colors as racist, anti-Muslims and that the USA is trying to show Muslims some respect.

His Czecholslovakia metaphor is interesting and almost the reverse of the situation he portrays. As the Jews were pushed out of Nazi countries so to were Arabs pushed out of Palestine.

[This message has been edited by Snouter (edited 10-05-2001).]

86Dude
10-05-2001, 03:12 PM
Bad U.S, Bad, Bad U.S.

86Dude
10-05-2001, 03:13 PM
Bad U.S, Bad, Bad U.S.

Fordman50
10-05-2001, 03:17 PM
I say we cut Iseal off and stop proping them up with our tax money. I was actually happy to hear Bush's statements about an idependent state for the palistinians. If we hadnt had our head up Isreals azz so deep, maybe we wouldnt have ever been targeted for terrorism in the first place!

------------------
Winner of the "peoples Choice award" for supreme advocate of the people!

I'm not "always right", it just seems that way

Spelling is for kids! I think you got the point!

A little empathy goes a long way

http://www.bushorchimp.com/images/pic36.jpg
But for creatures of lesser intelligence, the word EMPATHY can be a hard word to roll off the lips.

Snouter
10-05-2001, 05:44 PM
Originally posted by Fordman50:
If we hadnt had our head up Isreals azz so deep, maybe we wouldnt have ever been targeted for terrorism in the first place!


Exactly right. That and half way decent aircraft security or if the socialists allowed us to observe the 2nd amendment would have prevented it. Check out the background of Arik "The Bulldozer" Sharon.

Sharon has a perverse alliance with the Palestinians: His provocations justify their worst fears about Israeli oppression. Their violence—in reaction to his provocations—justifies Sharon's pessimism about Palestinian untrustworthiness

Stories about Sharon's ruthlessness, demonstrated in battle after battle, are legion. There was the time in the 1950s when Sharon was head of the 101 unit, a special force designed to fight Arab terrorism, and needed to launch a reprisal raid against Syria. His men were staked out on a kibbutz near the border, with orders not to move until provoked. According to the story, Sharon came running in one afternoon, saying: "Great news! They just killed the guard!"

Another telling anecdote places him in 1973, desperate to break the cease-fire agreement between Egypt and Israel, ready to stage training maneuvers to provoke an Egyptian reaction. The plan, which would have put his troops at great risk, was foiled by the army's upper echelon; but, says Chafets, "he was prepared to risk lots of lives just to get a fight going."

The Sabra and Shatila massacre of 1982 -- for which Sharon was found "indirectly responsible" by an official Israeli investigative commission -- was his most memorable and disastrous blunder. He was stripped of his job as defense minister and put in the political dog house. Sharon, who saw himself as Israel's next prime minister, made the most out of the minor portfolios he was given, continuing to push forward his settlement plan no matter what title he held.

I can't believe anyone would be so evil as to do this but it almost makes one wonder if the Mossad did indeed know of an impending hijackings. Sharon might have told them keep silent. What better way to eradicate the Arabs than by using the USA blind with a need for revenge?



[This message has been edited by Snouter (edited 10-05-2001).]

Powerboss
10-06-2001, 04:37 AM
Originally posted by Fordman50:
I say we cut Iseal off and stop proping them up with our tax money. I was actually happy to hear Bush's statements about an idependent state for the palistinians. If we hadnt had our head up Isreals azz so deep, maybe we wouldnt have ever been targeted for terrorism in the first place!



Yeah, if it was only that simple what a great world it would be.

We could abandon Israel tomorrow and that wont change a damn thing about how these people feel about us. The terrorism will continue and they will invade Israel.



------------------
War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself.
--John Stuart Mill--

CodyChaos
10-08-2001, 04:25 AM
Israel is just as bad as the palestinians with all that fighting. HOWEVER the Israelis offered Arafat and company more than generous terms for creating an independent palestinian homeland but they rejected it and went back to launching suicide attacks.

------------------
"He could not plead want of employment, nor incapacity of getting his bread in an honest way, but frankly own'd it was to get rid of the disagreeable superiority of some masters he was acquainted with and the love of novelty and change."

William Defoe on Bartholomew Roberts career of piracy

Google