Google
 

View Full Version : John Kerry raising funds with Satan worshipper


JAT
03-04-2004, 01:47 AM
Interesting:
http://www.halturnershow.com/KerryWithSatanWorshipper.html

Johnson
03-04-2004, 02:20 AM
Already posted it :p

Criminal
03-04-2004, 07:56 AM
Kerry was also a member of Skull and Bones, as was Dubya. I don't like ether really. But at least Kerry is a friend of the working man. Its like, Kerry may be a devil, but he is our devil!:D

drunken hearted man
03-04-2004, 08:29 AM
Originally posted by Criminal
But at least Kerry is a friend of the working man.

lmao yeah right. you can't be serious with this statement, can you?

RightWingZealot
03-04-2004, 08:52 AM
But at least Kerry is a friend of the working man.

LOL.
yeah right. And GW is a conservative!

Criminal
03-04-2004, 01:01 PM
Originally posted by drunken hearted man


lmao yeah right. you can't be serious with this statement, can you?
Well, he is not on the same level as Kucinich, but he does pay lip service to the usual stuff that Demorats usually do.

I see Kerry as the lesser of two evils.

Now Bush is sucking up to all the hispanic voters and last I heard he got a lot of sportsmen upset by selling out america's woodlands to land developers.

I think they are both corrupt really, but what can you do?

Betty
03-04-2004, 01:21 PM
I think it's a chop.

Miss Misery
03-04-2004, 01:33 PM
Originally posted by Betty
I think it's a chop.
of that, you are correct:

Von Apfelstrudel
03-04-2004, 01:51 PM
Marylin manson for president !

Snouter
03-04-2004, 03:09 PM
It is somewhat odd the year the paper was published was folded over. But if you compare the two pics, it requires a multilayered photoshop edit since one side of the pentagram is blocked in one pic and the other side is blocked in the other, unless they cut the pentagram in half and reversed it. Kerry's shadow is a little prominant and is on a different side compared to Anton's on the second pic. I suppose a test would be to scan a newspaper photo and see how it appears digitally. I would think the dots that make up the newsprint photo would be more visible.

Stone
03-04-2004, 03:22 PM
It says in the article that Kerry is for religious freedom - which is a good thing to be all about.

And then there's Bush who is all for Christianity and "Christian morals" (as if they even exist anymore).

At least kerry has an open mind.

Betty
03-04-2004, 03:28 PM
Originally posted by Stone
It says in the article that Kerry is for religious freedom - which is a good thing to be all about.

And then there's Bush who is all for Christianity and "Christian morals" (as if they even exist anymore).

At least kerry has an open mind.

Even though it's a photochop and never actually happened.

Stone
03-04-2004, 03:31 PM
yea, i was just sayin... ;)

BIG GABE
03-04-2004, 04:30 PM
I don't care if John Kerry posed with Lavey. The Church of Satan doesn't go around kindnapping cats for rituals and eating people.

Miss Miz posted a much more credible pic. That looks like Manson from his florida days with the Spooky Kids.

And what should I expect next from this bb? A pic of John Kerry shoeing up Saddam's ass with a twinkie?

Betty
03-04-2004, 04:37 PM
Originally posted by BIG GABE
Miss Miz posted a much more credible pic. That looks like Manson from his florida days with the Spooky Kids

Actually it's the same pic... sorta.

Look at Misery's pic and look at the pic in question.
They took Misery's pic, reversed it, and then pasted Mr. Kerry over Mr. Manson.

igofast
03-04-2004, 05:12 PM
Did anyone actually take this seriously? LaVey died in 1997.

Betty
03-04-2004, 05:24 PM
Originally posted by igofast
Did anyone actually take this seriously? LaVey died in 1997.

If you look at the date in the corner, it was supposed to have happened some time in the 80's.

igofast
03-04-2004, 05:30 PM
Originally posted by Betty
If you look at the date in the corner, it was supposed to have happened some time in the 80's.
Yeah, didn't notice that. If the Hal Turner show actually thinks the photo is real, it seems like they're trying to make it look like this is a recent story though. Regardless, it's a chop.

I just checked out the site for the hal turner show and all I can say is holy **** what a joke.

Von Apfelstrudel
03-04-2004, 06:05 PM
That show seems to be a priceless theatre of grotesque, without the artistic side

Islandtime
03-04-2004, 07:12 PM
Dont know who Hal Turner is but I would be really happy if guys like that would get their asses sued off. Too bad cause so many people of limited intelligence swallow it whole.

ColWTH
03-04-2004, 07:45 PM
... wait a minute!!

I thought EVERY Democrat was a Satan Worshipper?

;)

Von Apfelstrudel
03-04-2004, 07:46 PM
Originally posted by ColWTH
... wait a minute!!

I thought EVERY Democrat was a Satan Worshipper?

;)


lol
Predictable, but still funny :D

Diverlady
03-05-2004, 07:58 AM
I am beginning to think that Bush is the Anti-christ tho :)

BIG GABE
03-05-2004, 11:48 AM
Ah well, all this proves is the sensationalism that JAT is willing to post...

igofast
03-05-2004, 01:25 PM
Originally posted by ColWTH
I thought EVERY Democrat was a Satan Worshipper?
Just FYI, the members of the satanic church don't actually believe satan is a real person/being/force. They don't worship satan, they don't believe he exists.

Truth Teller
03-05-2004, 05:11 PM
Originally posted by drunken hearted man


lmao yeah right. you can't be serious with this statement, can you?
Well,I'd say Kerry comes closer than anyone else,including Ralph "Ego" Nader.

Originally posted by ColWTH
... wait a minute!!

I thought EVERY Democrat was a Satan Worshipper?

;)

Nah,we're too disorganized for that.

;)

ColWTH
03-05-2004, 06:46 PM
Ha, ha.

Yeah, you are probably right. After all. One leftists definition of Satan is probably different than YOUR definition of Satan. So how can they all be Satan worshipers if they can't even agree on what Satan IS?!

igofast
03-05-2004, 06:49 PM
Originally posted by ColWTH
Yeah, you are probably right. After all. One leftists definition of Satan is probably different than YOUR definition of Satan. So how can they all be Satan worshipers if they can't even agree on what Satan IS?!
Originally posted by igofast
Just FYI, the members of the satanic church don't actually believe satan is a real person/being/force. They don't worship satan, they don't believe he exists.
joking or not, might as well know the facts.

drunken hearted man
03-05-2004, 06:55 PM
Originally posted by Truth Teller

Well,I'd say Kerry comes closer than anyone else,including Ralph "Ego" Nader.



I love how Ralph Nader is now an egomaniac for daring to challenge the Democratic party. How sickening that he is criticized for exercising his right to run for office; obviously people want him to run or it wouldn't even be an issue because people wouldn't vote for him. So your real beef is with people who won't give in and align themselves with one of the two bloated corrupt parties that are destroying this country, not Nader. And you claim to want real change in government, that's a laugh.

Incidentally I'd like to see some of the evidence that Kerry is "for the working man", please. If you don't mind.

ColWTH
03-05-2004, 10:19 PM
DHM,
I agree to some degree about your point on Nader. He has every right to run.

However, can't you see even a little bit how egomanical it might seem? He has no party, no organization and no one clamouring for his candidacy as he did in the past. Doesn't it seem a bit silly this time?

drunken hearted man
03-05-2004, 10:28 PM
Well it's not like he had a chance in hell last election either. Like I said, people want him to run or they wouldn't vote for him. Last poll I looked at he had about 5%. That's not an insubstantial amount of people. He may very well sway the election again, and he might even be the factor that gets Geoorge Bush re-elected but I don't care. If John Kerry stood for things that I believe in I would vote for him, but he doesn't, end of story. If Bush or Kerry wins then my opinions are still marginalized, so what the hell difference does it make.

lily
03-06-2004, 03:45 AM
speaking of Democrats and satan.... thanks for giving me an opportunity to post the infamous demon pic. :p

Powerboss
03-06-2004, 04:41 AM
Why didn't Nader run as a Democrat?

Snouter
03-06-2004, 12:45 PM
Powerboss, that is a question I would like answered also; especially since he didn't hesitate to distance himself from the Green (Red Inside) Party.

Truth Teller
03-06-2004, 04:19 PM
Originally posted by ColWTH
Ha, ha.

Yeah, you are probably right. After all. One leftists definition of Satan is probably different than YOUR definition of Satan. So how can they all be Satan worshipers if they can't even agree on what Satan IS?!

Ya got it.:nice:
Originally posted by drunken hearted man


I love how Ralph Nader is now an egomaniac for daring to challenge the Democratic party. How sickening that he is criticized for exercising his right to run for office; obviously people want him to run or it wouldn't even be an issue because people wouldn't vote for him. So your real beef is with people who won't give in and align themselves with one of the two bloated corrupt parties that are destroying this country, not Nader. And you claim to want real change in government, that's a laugh.

Incidentally I'd like to see some of the evidence that Kerry is "for the working man", please. If you don't mind.


Yeah,yeah,same old,same old.

I do like your avavtar though,Monk rules.

Truth Teller
03-06-2004, 04:22 PM
Originally posted by drunken hearted man

He may very well sway the election again, and he might even be the factor that gets Geoorge Bush re-elected but I don't care.



Well,I'm not an uncaring person,if Nader puts Bush in office again he should be run out of the country on a rail.

Originally posted by Powerboss
Why didn't Nader run as a Democrat?

Good question.

drunken hearted man
03-06-2004, 06:15 PM
"Yeah,yeah,same old,same old."

Ahh, so you're not even going to attempt to qualify the statement that "Kerry is for the working man"? Not even a word to back up your assertion? Perhaps you're trying to outdo contra in terms of obtuseness. Nader has done more for working-class people in America without ever even being in office than Kerry has in the Senate.

"Well,I'm not an uncaring person,if Nader puts Bush in office again he should be run out of the country on a rail."

That is a ridiculous statement. Nader isn't putting anyone in office, he is representing people who are not represented by the two major political parties that control our government. I suppose you'd like to run everyone out of the country who doesn't vote the way you like, eh?

Powerboss
03-06-2004, 06:43 PM
I suppose you'd like to run everyone out of the country who doesn't vote the way you like, eh?

Sure seems that way.

Don't waste your time with him DHM. He won't qualify anything he says.

Banky
03-06-2004, 10:47 PM
Originally posted by Criminal
Kerry was also a member of Skull and Bones, as was Dubya. I don't like ether really. But at least Kerry is a friend of the working man. Its like, Kerry may be a devil, but he is our devil!:D
How can Kerry be a friend of the working man and sign NAFTA?

Truth Teller
03-09-2004, 06:52 PM
Originally posted by drunken hearted man
"Yeah,yeah,same old,same old."

Ahh, so you're not even going to attempt to qualify the statement that "Kerry is for the working man"? Not even a word to back up your assertion? Perhaps you're trying to outdo contra in terms of obtuseness.


Please,the name-calling is uncouth.


Nader has done more for working-class people in America without ever even being in office than Kerry has in the Senate.


Ok wise guy,I'm from the working-class and I can't think of one thing Nader did for me [and those like me].

So please,back up what you say.


That is a ridiculous statement. Nader isn't putting anyone in office, he is representing people who are not represented by the two major political parties that control our government.



That's not how the real world works [of course PB backs you up,he knows a vote for Nader is a vote for Bush].

I suppose you'd like to run everyone out of the country who doesn't vote the way you like, eh?

Well, if I could do that,this country would be in a golden age.:D


Originally posted by Banky

How can Kerry be a friend of the working man and sign NAFTA?

Republicans were behind NAFTA as much as Democrats [if not more].

I have mixed feelings on NAFTA,I don't see what harm has come from it.

Google