I have yet to be replied to. :d

http://www.discussanything.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=32797

Reask the question, dont' get it moved to the other thread :)

Hash it out here.

I was mostly moving the product of hours of research. :p There is no question, since I'm obviously right. :D

Who wants to argue? :mad:

My main problem with JFK and the assassination is how open and closed peolpe want it to be, whereas, the appearance is that the assassination was anything but open and closed...

NEARLY 40 YEARS ago, the Warren Commission released its findings on the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.
The report and its 26 volumes of hearings and exhibits, with 17,000 pages of testimony and more than 10 million words, initially were celebrated as the most comprehensive investigation in history. The commission concluded that Lee Harvey Oswald alone assassinated JFK - there was no domestic or foreign conspiracy behind the tragedy in Dallas on Nov. 22, 1963.

Over the years, the conclusions of the presidential commission headed by Chief Justice Earl Warren have come under sustained attack by critics who charge that they were nothing more than official mythology, a massive deception to cover up the politically unacceptable truth that Mr. Kennedy was a victim of a conspiracy. Defenders of the Warren Commission Report, while acknowledging its shortcomings in some areas, still insist that the evidence supports the commission's findings that Mr. Oswald acted alone in the killing of America's 35th president.

With the passage and amending of the Freedom of Information Act and the so-called JFK Act of 1994, millions of pages of documents related to the assassination have been released to the public.

An examination of this massive official record raises unanswered questions and impossibilities galore regarding the ballistic evidence, the nature of Mr. Kennedy's wounds, the ignored testimony of key witnesses, the suppression and destruction of Mr. Kennedy's autopsy report and other forensic evidence that exonerates Mr. Oswald. It exposes the government's case against Mr. Oswald as a public relations exercise and not a good-faith investigation into the Kennedy assassination.




http://www.sunspot.net/news/opinion/oped/bal-op.jfk21nov21,0,1495991.story?coll=bal-oped-headlines

I will re-engage in this debate. Potyondi, let us start with an aspect of the assassination you doubt THE MOST. We'll do this one at a time. :)

EDIT: This is perfectly timed. :D

I'll check my books out again and get back to you. ;)

I think more than anything else, if I had an opportunity and the facts that said Lee was innocent, I would be out there shouting it loud and clear. But the facts point in the other direction. If you go right down the line and look at it, all the facts will point to Lee's involvement. Lee actually committed the crime, period.


--Robert Oswald, brother to Lee Harvey Oswald :p