Was listening to art bell last night and his guest was talking about the possibilites of UFO's and aliens coming from within the earth. He was saying he believes the earth is hollow. He went on to quote sightings by eskimo's of people that were like them, but not normal, and when they approached the strange people, they went off in the water.

I think the site was http://www.hollowplanets.com/ Man, that site sux.. not much info at all.


Wish I had more info.. it was very interesting

The interesting question that arises though...if they come of earth are they alien?

Are they anymore alien than worms, fish, dogs, cats or us?

I heard some of that last night, there are a bunch of websites that talk about th Earth being hollow but it just doesn't seem possible. Supposedly there is a race of highly advanced "Aliens" that live in there somewhere and they fly out of holes in the poles and that is why we see UFO's.

Originally posted by Corporate Avenger
I heard some of that last night, there are a bunch of websites that talk about th Earth being hollow but it just doesn't seem possible. Supposedly there is a race of highly advanced "Aliens" that live in there somewhere and they fly out of holes in the poles and that is why we see UFO's.


yep, that is it. Supposed to have some pics of some "mountains" that werent there or something. Wish I had those links. I will poke around on artbell.com and find them

They wouldn't be called Morlocks would they?

There might be alot of things we don't know about the planet, but it is a pretty safe bet that it isn't hollow.

There would be no way for seismic shocks to travel through the core, so we wouldn't e.g. have felt Krakatoa going off or be able to detect nuclear tests in faraway nations.....

Unless they knew dat, so they cunningly faked it. That's the great thing about conspiracy theories; the more evidence there is against it, the more horrible and all-pervading the conspiracy must be ;)

Here is an essay I found real quick.

Hollow Moon?
or
From Where The Bells Toll by Dennis Crenshaw

Another piece of evidence pointing towards the theory that all heavenly bodies are hollow is that, as you would expect with a hollow sphere, both the Earth and our moon are known to "ring like a bell" when hit with a shock wave.

In "Moongate: Suppressed findings of The US Space Program" (1982), Nuclear Engineer and researcher/writer William L. Brian II presents evidence proving that the moon, as any hollow sphere would, "rings" when hit by asteroids or heavy space junk. And that's not all. According to Dr. Brian, "the evidence provided by Apollo seismic experiments also points to the conclusion that the moon is hollow and relatively rigid." (1)
He also reports:

"It is not commonly known that the Earth displays the same bell-like ringing or reverberations as the moon. Since the Earth is 81.56 times more massive than the moon, it takes a much larger explosion or shock wave to generate this effect.
"Joseph Goodavage referenced such occurrences in his book, "Astrology: The Space Age Science". He mentioned that the ringing effect was recorded during the May 22, 1960 Chilean earthquake. This was supposedly the most violent earthquake that had been recorded since the establishment of official world records in 1881. Goodavage provided a description of the effect which was given at the 1961 World Earthquake Conference, held at Helsinki, Finland.
The description stated that the shock was so severe that the "entire planet rang like a bell". The ringing continued for a considerable length of time in a regular series of slow impulses which were recorded at various independent seismic stations. Goodavage also noted that the planet rang again as a result of the Anchorage, Alaska earthquake of March 27, 1964. It seems hard to believe that scientists were so appalled in finding that the moon rang like a bell. After all, the Earth displays the same characteristic". (2)


Proof that the "ringing" of the moon is common knowledge in the scientific and NASA communities is presented in communications between Mission Control and the men aboard the Apollo 17 moon mission on December 29, 1972.

"LUNAR MODULE PILOT (LMP): Was there any indication on the seismometers on the impact about the time I saw a light flash on the surface? CAPCOM: Stand by. We'll check on that.
LMP: A UFO perhaps, don't worry about it. It could have been one of the other flashes of light
CAPCOM: Jack, just some words from the back room for you. There may have been an impact at the time you called, but . So it would mask any other impact." (3)

Research/Writer Don Wilson presents other well-documented evidence supporting the Hollow Moon Theory.

"The moon has only 60% of the density of Earth. The improbable fact that an equal amount of earth material seemed to weigh almost twice as much as moon matter mystified everyone. Why the difference? The actual answer, some scientists felt, pointed to the possibility that part or all of the moon's interior was hollow!" (4)

Then there's a report in the July 1962 issue of Astronautics by Dr. Gordon McDonald, a leading scientist at the Nation Aeronautics and Space Administration in which he states that "according to an analysis of the moon's motion, it appears that the moon is hollow: if the astronomical data are reduced, it is found that the data require that the interior of the moon is less dense than the outer parts. Indeed, it would seem that the moon is more like a hollow than a homogeneous sphere.’" (5)

In 1959 eminent scientist Professor Iosif Shklovsky put forth his findings in relation to the "moons" circling Mars. "After carefully weighing up the evidence he concludes that they are both hollow" (6)

While some "orthodox" scientists will quietly admit that some earthly bodies are probably hollow, they steadfastly refuse to accept the fact that ALL planets and moons are NATURALLY hollow and hurry to add they must be "artificial" satellites.

For instance:
"The moon seems to be a comparatively light world in contrast with the planet Earth. The fact that the moon is only about 60% as dense as our planet has led scientists to two theories: that the moon is without an iron core, and/or, that it is partially hollow.
"Data and computations – among them, Dr. McDonald's motion studies, – point to the conclusion that our moon is internally hollow to a great extent.
Since most scientists claim there is no natural explanation for such peculiar phenomenon (because satellite worlds are not naturally hollow), the inevitable conclusion indicates that the moon is artificially hollow." (7)

Once again, the "establishment" scientists are trying to "fit" the facts to their "sacred cow" theory. In no way will they "buck" the system and admit the obvious. The facts, once again, support the theory laid out by Gardner and Reed all heavenly bodies are hollow.

Man, this is kind of mind boggling. Do you guys really think that this could be true? Or is this just another well-presented case of quackery?

Anyone with an understanding of physics realizes a hollow earth is not possible, it would collapse on itself, or rip apart.

This is not my belief, but if aliens would hide anywhere on earth, it would be underwater. We have seen very little. If they had a city or something a few miles down, we would not find it for a looooong time.