Los Angeles, Alta California - September 8, 2003 - (ACN) Ever since the Mexican army quelled a rebellion by a group of ungrateful Anglo immigrants in its northern state of Tejas at the Alamo in 1836, Anglos have utilized the slogan "Remember the Alamo" as coded words to discriminate and often "lynch" Americans of Mexican descent. This type of ethnic hatred, experienced most acutely by Los Tejanos, will surely worsen now that the Zionist Michael Eisner will release its historically inaccurate and one sided new film "The Alamo" around December of this year.

Mexico's military actions at the Alamo were undertaken for the sole purpose of defending its territory from, what General Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna called, "a rabble of wretched adventurers to whom our authorities have unwisely given benefits that even Mexicans did not enjoy". The Mexican government had been extremely gracious in allowing Anglo colonists led by Steven F. Austin to settle in Tejas or Texas as it is known today. Mexico had granted vast tracts of land to about 20,000 settlers but a group of ragged renegades, under the impetus that was later called "Manifest Destiny", conspired to steal the whole state.

http://aztlan.net/alamo.htm

http://www.animationartgallery.com/images/WBL/WBL35C.gif

Oh no!

Isn't Cruz Boostyourtaxes in this group, or is it Mecha, or both?

Mecha is aztlan. ( i think. )

i know the A in mecha stands for aztlan.

i hope this movie creates more "anti mexicanism."

Stupidity.

Originally posted by Johnson
Mecha is aztlan. ( i think. )

i know the A in mecha stands for aztlan.

i hope this movie creates more "anti mexicanism."
Aztlan is the southwest U.S.

MEChA is a Meso-American supremacy organization.

I know Texas history teachers in Texas middle schools were encouraged to refrain from teaching about the Alamo because it painted Mexicans as the bad guys.

:rolleyes:

I would really have to see the movie before making a final judgement. The movie trailers indicated that the film attempts to show the event from both sides. I do know that the original film version of the event, staring John Wayne and Richard Woodmark was completely biased.

Originally posted by Criminal
I do know that the original film version of the event, staring John Wayne and Richard Woodmark was completely biased.

It was also very good.

I don't see any need to glorify Santa Ana.

Since when do we ever look at events like these from both sides? Just curious.

Originally posted by JAT

http://www.animationartgallery.com/images/WBL/WBL35C.gif

Off topic, but I read that Speedy Gonzalez is banned in the US and the woman in Tom and Jerry has had her legs painted white and an Irish accent dubbed over the original black accent.

Santa Ana was a coward who executed his prisoners, then later attempted to escape Houston's army by donning the uniform of a private, but his silk underwear gave him away.

Sure, the Texican army and the early Texas Rangers wrested Texas away from Mexico, but the Mexicans, and their Spanish ancestors before them, stole it first from the Comanche, Apache and other native peoples. But that history is what made Texas what it is today, a blend of hearty cultures including the hispanics, the Irish-Cherokees and the Germans.

He's right you know, just the other day I saw a mexican and beat him senseless while yelling "remember the alamo!!" at the top of my lungs. Damn that felt good.

Originally posted by Chris


Off topic, but I read that Speedy Gonzalez is banned in the US and the woman in Tom and Jerry has had her legs painted white and an Irish accent dubbed over the original black accent.


Yup.

Originally posted by jojo
Since when do we ever look at events like these from both sides? Just curious.

Welcome to multiculteralism and Political Correctness.

Originally posted by Johnson



Yup.

:p We still get the un-PCfied versions.

Speedy isn't banned. I see Speedy on Cartoon Network all the time. :confused: