Google
 

View Full Version : Civilizations in Africa: The Iron Age South of the Sahara


Criminal
12-31-2002, 12:20 AM
http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~dee/CIVAFRCA/CIVAFRCA.HTM


African south of the Sahara lived largely in nomadic, hunter-gatherer groups up until 200 BC. As a result, African populations were very sparse. There are several speculations as to why sub-Saharan Africans remained in hunting-gathering groups, but they are all guess-work. Perhaps the most reasonable explanations involve the abundance of resources and the protection that their isolation gave them from invasion and migration pressures.

Still, early sub-Saharan Africans developed metallurgy at a very early stage, possibly even before other peoples. Around 1400 BC, East Africans began producing steel in carbon furnaces (steel was invented in the west in the eighteenth century). The Iron Age itself came very early to Africa, probably around the sixth century BC, in Ethiopia, the Great Lakes region, Tanzania, and Nigeria. Iron technology, however, only spread slowly across Africa; it wasn't until the first century AD that the smelting of iron began to rapidly diffuse throughout the continent.

The instrument of that spread was the Bantu migrations. Bantu is a family of languages that are closely related and represent the largest linguistic family of African languages. Bantu speaking people migrated out of north-central Africa in the last century BC and these migrations continued all throughout the first millenium AD. They migrated south into the rain forest regions around the Congo and they migrated east into the East African highlands. Wherever they migrated, they imposed their language, which mixed with and replaced indiegenous languages. How they managed to impose their language on such a wide range of people across such a huge swathe of territory is anyone's guess. Further migrations in the first millenium then displaced the earlier Bantu immigrants, who pushed farther east and south. These Bantu immigrants would eventually found the civilization of the Mwenumatapa, or "Great Zimbabwe" civilization. Not only did the Bantu spread iron-smelting techniques across Africa, they also were responsible for diffusing agriculture, particularly agriculture of high-yield crops such as yams, bananas, and plantains. The spread of agriculture led to the explosive growth of village life all throughout Africa.

Urban settlement began at a very early date in Africa. The earliest urban settlement were stone-walled towns in southern Mauritania that date back to sometime in the second millemium BC. An explosion of urban settlement in the Sahel region immediately south of the Sahara began between 600 and 200 BC. The Sahel is a hot, dry savannah that can support human agriculture and settlement. The first urban settlements were Sahelian: Jenne, Gao, and Kumbi (later Kumbi Saleh, the capital of the kingdom of Ghana). All of these urban centers grew up in oasis and river regions which could support such large populations.
Richard Hooker

Ironweed
12-31-2002, 11:59 AM
Originally posted by Criminal
http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~dee/CIVAFRCA/CIVAFRCA.HTM


Still, early sub-Saharan Africans developed metallurgy at a very early stage, possibly even before other peoples. Around 1400 BC, East Africans began producing steel in carbon furnaces (steel was invented in the west in the eighteenth century). The Iron Age itself came very early to Africa, probably around the sixth century BC, in Ethiopia, the Great Lakes region, Tanzania, and Nigeria. Iron technology, however, only spread slowly across Africa; it wasn't until the first century AD that the smelting of iron began to rapidly diffuse throughout the continent.

I cannot make heads or tails out of this paragraph. Are we supposed to think they were producing steel BEFORE they were producing iron? :confused: 1400 BCE for steel 799-700 BCE for the "Iron Age"? It also contradicts the link I posted in the thread debaterdebater started, stating that the Assyrians introduced iron to Africa, much later.

Noddy
12-31-2002, 12:59 PM
I find such assertions up there with UFOs.

Criminal
01-02-2003, 02:58 AM
Originally posted by Ironweed


I cannot make heads or tails out of this paragraph. Are we supposed to think they were producing steel BEFORE they were producing iron? :confused: 1400 BCE for steel 799-700 BCE for the "Iron Age"? It also contradicts the link I posted in the thread debaterdebater started, stating that the Assyrians introduced iron to Africa, much later.
Ask the webmaster on that website.

Prodigal Son
01-15-2003, 11:07 AM
Originally posted by Criminal
http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~dee/CIVAFRCA/CIVAFRCA.HTM


African south of the Sahara lived largely in nomadic, hunter-gatherer groups up until 200 BC. As a result, African populations were very sparse. There are several speculations as to why sub-Saharan Africans remained in hunting-gathering groups, but they are all guess-work. [quote]Perhaps the most reasonable explanations involve the abundance of resources and the protection that their isolation gave them from invasion and migration pressures.

I find the modern-day evolutionary psychologist explanation of sub-Saharan Africans having a boarderline retarded average IQ (around 70) to be far more convincing (and having more supporting evidence). This may also help explain the extremely high crime rate and HIV rates in Africa as well as he complete and utter economic ruin of the continent.

Criminal
01-15-2003, 02:07 PM
Originally posted by Prodigal Son


I find the modern-day evolutionary psychologist explanation of sub-Saharan Africans having a boarderline retarded average IQ (around 70) to be far more convincing (and having more supporting evidence). This may also help explain the extremely high crime rate and HIV rates in Africa as well as he complete and utter economic ruin of the continent.
I have heard that IQ tests are culturally biased. I also think the reason for this may be due to widespread illiteracy, poverty and poor health of sub-saharan africans.

Prodigal Son
01-15-2003, 02:23 PM
Originally posted by Criminal

I have heard that IQ tests are culturally biased.

A common misconception, refuted by Dr. Arthur Jensen, probably the world's foremost expert on intleligence testing, in his book Bias in Mental Testing. This quote summarizes his position:


For all their legitimate, practical and typical uses, present-day psychometric tests of mental ability have the same reliability and validity for native, English-speaking blacks (and American-born, English-speaking Hispanics and Asians) as they have for whites.


http://www.cycad.com/cgi-bin/pinc/dec98/books/r_jensen.html


I also think the reason for this may be due to widespread illiteracy, poverty and poor health of sub-saharan africans.

That's definitely part of the story. African Americans score more than one standard deviation higher on IQ tests than Africans, mostly because of improved health conditions and nutrition. Genetic difference however, seme to be part of the story as well.

Google