Google
 

View Full Version : Syrah, the next Merlot?


Redfield
10-18-2002, 01:23 PM
A Matter of Respect
Adam Strum, Editor and Publisher Wine Enthusiast Magazine

Wine enthusiasts think about what they drink—it’s part of the fun. Why aren’t we given the same consideration as self-styled gourmets?

Be careful what you wish for, I reminded myself as the bottles kept coming in…and coming in…and coming in…

More than a year ago we decided to do a story on Syrah. We wanted it to encompass this global phenomenon—we wanted to taste and compare as many of these versatile, flavorful wines as possible. It was already clear that Syrah was poised to become the hot variety of the new century. As you will read in the article, the statistics are startling: a 1,200 percent increase in plantings over ten years, sales of Syrah in certain venues up 85 percent in a single year, and so on.

Even so, we were not prepared for the industry’s response. We invited brands to submit two bottles each, one priced at $20 and under, the other $21 and over. We were inundated. There were so many submissions that we decided to divide the World Cup of Syrah into two parts, dictated by the price point we’d already established. (Look for the over-$21 Syrahs in our November issue.)

Clearly, this is the wine many people want to drink right now. Cynics might say that there’s a herd mentality, that people will drink whatever the media and advertisers want them to drink. I don’t agree. Most wine enthusiasts think about what they drink, whether they’re trying something new or enjoying a favorite variety; they give careful consideration to what they put in their glass. That thoughtfulness, that summoning of memories and preferences, is part of the fun.

I am most vividly reminded of this thoughtfulness by its absence…when I dine with someone who doesn’t even glance at the wine list, doesn’t examine the label when the bottle is presented, or orders generically (“I’ll have a glass of Chardonnay”). That’s fine; again, it’s a preference. But when I’m confronted by this attitude from an individual or company that professes to know and to care about wine, I am irked.

I recently traveled in business class for a transcontinental flight. I was delighted to find in my seat pocket a brochure with colorful, wine-related graphics, valuable information about winemaking—and a wine list. On the list were two wonderful fourth-growth Bordeaux—Château Beychevelle and Château Lafon-Rochet—as well as intriguing Mt. Tanglefoot Shiraz from South Eastern Australia. Of the white wine selections, the Greg Norman Estates Chardonnay caught my fancy. As the plane took off, I anticipated such a superb wine experience that the time would literally fly by.

However all my hopes were dashed when I was informed by the flight attendant that “unfortunately, we don’t have any of these wines on board” and “would I mind selecting one of these substitutes?” I scanned the list. Ordering one of them would be like going from the big leagues down to the minors. I was disappointed, but I received no sympathy from the attendant, who couldn’t understand why I wasn’t just as happy with what she was offering. After all, she said, it was “only wine.”

What if the menu was offering filet mignon? Would it be proper to serve ground round? Would the customers of this airline be happy with eggs sunny side up if they were promised Eggs Benedict? Why is it that food is treated with such respect but wine is an afterthought? It’s sad, because some well-intentioned people went to a great deal of effort to create a superb wine program for this airline and then it was poorly executed. Wine doesn’t yet earn the level of respect that fine food has earned in most people’s minds.

• • •

In addition to our Syrah tasting feature, in this issue we visit the heart of Argentina’s wine country, for Michael Schachner’s profile of the superb Malbecs and other wines being produced by that forward-thinking country. And West Coast Editor Steve Heimoff offers a tour, closer to home, of Lodi, California. Also in this issue, you’ll find great information on Scotch whiskies—these relatively inexpensive blends people have been overlooking in favor of hotter, hipper single malts. In every area of wine and spirits, people are either immune to, or subject to, trends. But at least they think about what they’re drinking. It matters to them. That makes for smart drinkers and smart readers.

Cheers!
Source (http://www.winemag.com/issues/OCT01/corner.cfm)

This would be interesting. Merlot was the top wine of red wines for part of the 80's and all of the 90's. Especially from the Napa and Monterey regions. With Syrah being...jejune.

I've had my share of bottles and drank my share of vintage Merlot, and most likely I'll stay with Merlot as my red. But, Rhoune(sp), and Australian seem to be the hot syrah varieties.

I'd like to see if this becomes the premiere red for this decade.

AdamJ
10-18-2002, 01:28 PM
Well Ive never had Syrah wine... Merlot is also common in my home. I will have to check this out with some wine tastings :D

Redfield
10-19-2002, 03:28 AM
LOL!

Of course, just for tasting. ;)

*cough*:bs:*cough*

I've had Syrah once or twice and never thought much of it. I'll have to try the Australian, I guess.

Redfield
10-22-2002, 05:39 PM
No love il vino?
:confused: :(

AdamJ
10-23-2002, 04:57 PM
Saw a 1999 from somewhere in Cali at Marshall Fields for $10 but I decided to get a cup of hot cocoa instead. LOL

I still have a few bottles of Merlot I need to go through anyways..

Redfield
10-28-2002, 12:23 PM
Originally posted by AdamJ
Saw a 1999 from somewhere in Cali at Marshall Fields for $10 but I decided to get a cup of hot cocoa instead. LOL

I still have a few bottles of Merlot I need to go through anyways..
Since we're the only two in this thread......
What kind of cocoa was it? :)

I have 1 bottle of Merlot to finish, but after that I think I'll research the Syrah from around here and get myself a bottle for kicks.

AdamJ
10-28-2002, 12:26 PM
Marshall Field's.. we were parusing and getting mad over how the Christmas decorations are already out!

As soon as I get a bottle of Syrah I will post in here LOL After all this build up it better be worth it!

Redfield
10-29-2002, 12:10 AM
Originally posted by AdamJ
As soon as I get a bottle of Syrah I will post in here LOL After all this build up it better be worth it!
Seriously. This newer stuff better be good. :)

Tally
10-30-2002, 08:56 PM
I think the Australian Shiraz is better, generally speaking, but I'm still a fan of merlot. I also like to try different Beaujolais

Redfield
10-30-2002, 11:25 PM
Originally posted by Tally
I think the Australian Shiraz is better, generally speaking, but I'm still a fan of merlot. I also like to try different Beaujolais
Aren't Shiraz and Syrah essentially the same thing? I'm still learning. :p

As for Beaujolais, I have yet to try it, but should I in the near future, I'd like to try any of the 1997 Beaujolais Nouveaux.

Redfield
11-11-2002, 02:57 AM
Well at dinner, on Friday, I ordered my first Syrah. I researched it a bit and new (basically) what I wanted. I ended up taking the waitresses advice and went with Pavona's first Syrah it was 1999 Purple Peacock Syrah.

It was a bold, rich wine. It bursted sprays of cherry, plum, and toasty oak.

I can see how this zesty, yet dry, wine will appeal to Zin lovers.

But I still won't hold it against any local Central California Merlots.

mari blu
11-12-2002, 03:46 PM
i liked the syrrah, but i'll stick to reslings. i much prefer the tastes of resling.

Google