PDA

View Full Version : The zionist regime gets more US taxpayer cash because of an "iron clad commitment" or something



Šñøü†ê®
01-25-2012, 03:39 AM
This is all hard to believe. Especially considering the zionist regime has claimed for itself offshore natural gas fields.


The Obama administration told Israeli officials this week that the U.S. plans to extend for three years $3.8 billion in loan guarantees to Israel...The loan guarantees are in addition to the unmatched support Washington gives to Israel – over $13 billion in direct aid since 2007 and more than $3 billion more scheduled for fiscal year 2012, not to mention privileged deals in military training and equipment. Many view this support as facilitating and endorsing Israel’s consistent oppression of Palestinians and numerous violations of international law, yet it is the most consensus-driven issue in Washington.

I don't think the trillions spent fighting their AIPAC WARS are factored into the calculation. :shrug:

http://news.antiwar.com/2012/01/24/us-to-grant-extension-of-3-8-billion-in-loan-guarantees-to-israel/

Šñøü†ê®
01-25-2012, 08:21 AM
Crazy CCC, thoughts? :p

lv9K1QWlESA

Cyclone Ranger
01-25-2012, 10:53 AM
Why do you keep citing a mentally homeless person....besides the fact that you're also mentally ill and unemployed?

antiquity
01-25-2012, 10:54 AM
Israel should be paying us protection money.

antiquity
01-25-2012, 10:56 AM
Why do you keep citing a mentally homeless person....besides the fact that you're also mentally ill and unemployed?

Speaking of mentally ill and unemployed, how your mental health and employment going these days?

GanjaFreebird
01-25-2012, 03:25 PM
Why do you keep citing a mentally homeless person....besides the fact that you're also mentally ill and unemployed?


HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!:jester:

GanjaFreebird
01-25-2012, 03:25 PM
Israel should be paying us protection money.

They already have by giving away Sinai (with all of the oil) to Egypt in the late 1970s, actually:).

antiquity
01-26-2012, 01:42 PM
It wasn't Israel's to give away.

GanjaFreebird
01-26-2012, 02:32 PM
It wasn't Israel's to give away.

It sure was between 1967-1979;). Egypt tried to do shit about it in 1973 by attacking us on our holliest day of the year, and almost lost the rest of their country to Israel then:rofl:. The only thing that saved them from a complete ass kicking by Israel was Soviet Union...fuckin' communists:rolleyes:.

Now, after that, Egypt realized that the only way they could get that land back was by making a deal with America to pressure Israel in return for benefiting American interests, and pretending to be at peace with Israel. The American gov't apparently felt that giving Israel all of that money would directly and indirectly benefit their interests in the middle east, if only Israel gave that land back to Egypt:shrug:. Sadat was obviously a business genius by also getting Jimmy Carter to sign 2-3 billions a year to Egypt (which continues to this day) as a part of this deal, and it's too bad that the insane savages in his country couldn't appreciate something like that and killed him because he wasn't enough of a barbarian for them:(.

antiquity
01-26-2012, 03:07 PM
It wasn't Israel's to give away any more than Iraq, Germany and Japan is ours.

Cyclone Ranger
01-26-2012, 04:48 PM
Israel wasn't Egypt's to invade either.

GanjaFreebird
01-26-2012, 04:58 PM
It wasn't Israel's to give away any more than Iraq, Germany and Japan is ours.

It was technically Israel's land, and Israel didn't have to give it back. You can't make a business deal with somebody, and then claim that they didn't own the property that they gave away to begin with, this is not how it works;):). The point is that Egypt attacked Israel, lost their land, and then there was a deal being made to return that land to them. If you don't like that deal, take this issue up with Jimmy Carter:p. How the fuck is it Israel's fault that he chose to pressure them and bribe them?

GanjaFreebird
01-26-2012, 04:59 PM
Israel wasn't Egypt's to invade either.

EXACTLY!!:nice::nice:

antiquity
01-26-2012, 05:12 PM
Israel wasn't Egypt's to invade either.

Egypt didn't invade Israel. Israel invaded Egypt.


sraeli armed forces push into Egypt toward the Suez Canal, initiating the Suez Crisis. They would soon be joined by French and British forces, creating a serious Cold War problem in the Middle East.

The catalyst for the joint Israeli-British-French attack on Egypt was the nationalization of the Suez Canal by Egyptian leader General Gamal Abdel Nasser in July 1956


Arabs did not invade Israel they lived there. Palestinians were driven out of their country to make place for the Jews who came there from Europe and other places.

Cyclone Ranger
01-26-2012, 05:17 PM
What's that have to do with the '73 invasion on Yom Kippur?

antiquity
01-26-2012, 05:39 PM
It proves that Israel is an aggressive country who cares little about human rights.

Cyclone Ranger
01-26-2012, 06:38 PM
Bullshit. 1956 was the one time in history they aggressively invaded without being provoked by an attack from their neighbors. Generalizing from an exception is unwarranted.

antiquity
01-26-2012, 10:36 PM
Like I said, It proves that Israel is an aggressive country who cares little about human rights.

GanjaFreebird
01-26-2012, 11:00 PM
The 1956 war had to do with France and England pressuring Israel to take over Sinai for their interests, as well as with Egypt threatening and attacking Israel around that time.

Having said that, Israel has returned it very shortly then, and Egypt lost it again in 1967 because they attacked Israel:rolleyes:.

GanjaFreebird
01-26-2012, 11:01 PM
Like I said, It proves that Israel is an aggressive country who cares little about human rights.

It's absolutely irrelevant even if it was true. When you make a deal, you make a deal, regardless if that country happens to be whatever, so once again, stop bullshiting.

antiquity
01-27-2012, 10:45 AM
It's absolutely irrelevant even if it was true.

So you agree that Israel is an aggressive country who cares little about human rights.

Cyclone Ranger
01-27-2012, 12:35 PM
Except for the fact they're always on the defense, and take a hell of lot of care to respect human rights.

Notalibtard
01-27-2012, 12:38 PM
Dont you people ever tire of these same old Joooz threads? Sheez!

GanjaFreebird
01-27-2012, 01:11 PM
So you agree that Israel is an aggressive country who cares little about human rights.


I don't, however, this has absolutely nothing to do with the subject AT ALL, even if it was true:shrug:. After all, there's no question about China being an aggressive country that doesn't give a shit about human rights, but we still respect our economic agreements with it, right;):).