Google
 

View Full Version : U.S. Abandons Microsoft Breakup Effort


eanax
09-06-2001, 11:38 AM
U.S. Abandons Microsoft Breakup Effort
Thursday September 6 11:17 AM ET
By Peter Kaplan

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Justice Department (news - web sites) said on Thursday it was no longer seeking the breakup of Microsoft Corp. and would strive to find a remedy in the three-year old case ``as quickly as possible.''

In a statement that initially pushed the technology giant's shares higher, the department said it would also not pursue an unresolved claim that the company illegally tied its Internet Explorer browser to its Windows operating system.

``The Department of Justice (news - web sites)'s Antitrust Division today advised Microsoft that it will not seek a break-up of the company in remand proceedings before the U.S. District Court,'' the statement said.

Instead, the department said it will pursue a remedy ''modeled after the interim conduct-related provisions of the final judgement previously ordered in the case.''

The announcement came as the Justice Department and Microsoft try to work out a proposal on how further proceedings should be structured.

``The department is seeking to streamline the case with the goal of securing an effective remedy as quickly as possible,'' it added.

After an initial boost, Microsoft stock fell as the market digested the news, despite the views of analysts that the department's decision was a positive development for the company.

``I'm a little surprised at the stock move,'' said Parker/Hunter analyst Kimberly Caughey. ``I wouldn't say that it removes the dark cloud from over Microsoft, because anything could happen in settlement talks. But it makes that cloud a little less threatening,'' she said.

A Microsoft spokesman said only that company officials ''remain committed to resolving the remaining issues in this case.''

The new judge assigned to handle the Microsoft case, U.S. District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, last month ordered the parties to report on the remaining issues in the legal battle by Sept. 14 and scheduled a meeting on the status of the case for Sept 21.

Kollar-Kotelly will hold hearings to decide what sanctions to impose on the software giant to prevent future abuse of its monopoly in personal computer operating systems.

She had also been set to consider whether the company violated the law by tying its Internet Explorer browser into the Windows operating system.

The department said today that pursuing that claim ``would only prolong proceedings and delay the imposition of relief that would benefit consumers.''

``In view of the Court of Appeals' unanimous decision that Microsoft illegally maintained its monopoly over PC-based operating systems -- the core allegation in the case -- the department believes that it has established a basis for relief that would end Microsoft's unlawful conduct, prevent its recurrence and open the operating system market to competition,'' the department said.

The U.S. Justice Department and 18 states' attorneys general suing Microsoft had asked Kollar-Kotelly to accelerate the proceedings by convening a meeting of the parties, potentially in the next 10 days.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in June upheld another district court judge's ruling that Microsoft holds a monopoly in the PC operating systems market and used illegal tactics to defend it.

However, the appeals court reversed Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson's order that Microsoft be split in two as an appropriate remedy for the violations.

Manu
09-06-2001, 12:25 PM
Man, I honestly am HAPPY about this.

I think MS makes a pretty solid product, and they don't even price gouge on it.

------------------
Manu Narayan

ChaoticThoughts
09-07-2001, 02:38 AM
Im not too worried about microsoft, as I am about the government taking control to ruin successful bussinesses.

Manu
09-07-2001, 11:26 AM
Hitting on what Snouter said in the other thread...

EXACTLY. The Clinton admin's persual of MS really hurt the companies bottom line and in turn did hurt the tech industry. Could the fact that netscape made (makes?) an inferior product be why MS has a foothold? I mean netscape's HTML is so much more limited than IEs...I stopped desiging with netscape in mind, it is just way too limiting.

But back to teh idea at hand...do you think MS hurt the industry?

I mean, they continued innovation, they have a good solid OS/Program line that ins't ridiculously priced...if anything they seem to continue to do alright for consumers.

------------------
Manu Narayan

Manu
09-07-2001, 11:26 AM
Hitting on what Snouter said in the other thread...

EXACTLY. The Clinton admin's persual of MS really hurt the companies bottom line and in turn did hurt the tech industry. Could the fact that netscape made (makes?) an inferior product be why MS has a foothold? I mean netscape's HTML is so much more limited than IEs...I stopped desiging with netscape in mind, it is just way too limiting.

But back to teh idea at hand...do you think MS hurt the industry?

I mean, they continued innovation, they have a good solid OS/Program line that ins't ridiculously priced...if anything they seem to continue to do alright for consumers.

------------------
Manu Narayan

ChaoticThoughts
09-08-2001, 05:03 AM
well, microsoft has its good and bad. I am for anything that progresses technology and science. But if you know the history of computers, you can understand why microsoft made it so big, and can later become a normal company or even disappear.

And if it was outrageously priced, people might not buy it, and switch over to linux.

Ax Slinger
09-09-2001, 04:56 PM
Microsoft made it big based on two things. Re-writing other people's software, and very aggresive marketing.


From the Microsoft Museum:

Microsoft was formed soon after the introduction of the Micro Instrumentation and Telemetry Systems (MITS) Altair, the first "personal computer," a build-it-yourself kit for hobbyists. Bill Gates and Paul Allen seized the opportunity to transform this early PC into a breakthrough -- the Altair needed software, a programming language that could make it perform useful computing tasks. That's when it all began.

Allen, employed by Honeywell, and his friend, Gates, a sophomore at Harvard, immediately set out to adapt the first personal computer language for the Altair, called BASIC. They worked in marathon 24-hour sessions to complete a working product, which was then licensed to MITS. Soon thereafter, Allen accepted a position with MITS as director of Software Development, and Gates followed him later that year to form an informal partnership called Micro-Soft, complete with hyphen.

The key word there is "adapt". BASIC (http://www.digitalcentury.com/encyclo/update/BASIC.html) was written by John G. Kemeny and Thomas Kurtz at Dartmouth College in the early 1960's.

Due to the fact that Kemeny and Kurtz did not protect BASIC by copyright, Gates and Allen, and many many others were able to adapt the code for use on many different platforms.

That pretty much explains how Microsoft got started. How it came to be the huge corporation it is today is the result of aggressive marketing, doing things nobody else did, and preventing other people and companies from doing exactly what Gates and Allen did to start the company in the first place.



------------------
Take Only Pictures, Leave Only Footprints.

Manu
09-10-2001, 12:18 PM
Oh I agree 100%. Gates is a business man first and a techno geek second.

He knows how to work it and persues it to the edge...

------------------
Manu Narayan

Google