Some say the world is crowded population wise. Some say the world isnt crowded population wise. Which side do you lean toward? Have any facts about it?

The thuth of the matter is: the world's systems and functions and markets and check out lanes (lol) are crowded with ppl. That's what makes the world crowded. When you cant get in to get a job anywhere = the world is crowded, even if it aint population wise in a poorly backed claim. The thing that is overlooked and not given a name or label are things (both needed and used by ppl) to a population that are taken up and filled to the brim of capacity, so to speak.

What good is no over-pupulation of ppl to areas if the the world, in other ways, is crowded in an under "thing-ulation" way? The thing can be a market, a function, a check out lane (lol), a system, and/or a etc.

What do you think though?

And should they make "thingulation" or rather "pop-thingulation" a modern word?

Imagine one day where you have to pay just to stand in a 'moving gradually down' line of a check out lane or a 'moving gradually down' line at the secretary of state or etc., besides whatever the point is you're in it for... The money would prolly be used toward adding to the available capacity to what is under pop-thingulated. If over pop-thingulated, then things go down suddenly to you such as a line you're in in waiting to be served.

So should the world maximize its capacities to etc for the claimed not over population?

The first thing that comes to mind when you think "over population" is the crowdedness of area. Area you first think is land area. Those are your first mistaken thought! There is more than "area" alone or rather more areas than land that can be over populated. Example: "In what areas is the market strong?" Surely there are other kinds of areas besides land that the population to is overlooked or not looked at at all.

Bottomline is: Crowdedness is an ecomonic and social problem # 1. But what are those in politics doing about it?

There are billions of people, but it's a very big planet. Most of the world is underwater, but there are still enormous tracts of undeveloped land worldwide. There's enough room for everybody, and more.

Nuke China and India, problem solved.

Nuke China and India, problem solved.

Holla!

Nuke China and India, problem solved.

I don't know. If it ever came down to hand to hand combat with China, and they had pitchforks and small arms, they would probably win by sheer numbers. We would have to nuke em' first or they would kick our asses and pitchfork us to death, but they would still have a hell of a fight, thanks to the 2nd amendment.

Holla!

No Holla. Indian women are hot. And Indian food is the bomb.

There are billions of people, but it's a very big planet. Most of the world is underwater, but there are still enormous tracts of undeveloped land worldwide. There's enough room for everybody, and more.

No, there isn't, the worlds resources are already strained, and we're seeing mass extictions, desertification, deforestation, etc.

If people weren't so wasteful the Earth could sustain our current pop levels, but with human nature 2 billion is probably the best balance.

I don't know where people get this idea that there's room for more than 6+ billion people, there simply is not, period.

Human beings are food when you get right down to it. Pure protein. I don't see a problem with too much food walking around.

No, there isn't, the worlds resources are already strained, and we're seeing mass extictions, desertification, deforestation, etc.

If people weren't so wasteful the Earth could sustain our current pop levels, but with human nature 2 billion is probably the best balance.

I don't know where people get this idea that there's room for more than 6+ billion people, there simply is not, period.

I said there is plenty of room.

People are starving because of people; not because there isn't enough food. WE in the US throw away enough food every day to feed the entire world. There are ample resources for everyone, but corrupt governments, ideologies and other factors keep them out of the hands of many.

finally! someone else sees the huge societal problem of large lines in the grocery store.

god damn we need to do something about this immediately.

i know putting more workers out to man more registers would be an easy fix but i feel we should get the government involved, after all they seem to fix and cure all that ails us and we dont want to get our own hands dirty by doing something about it ourselves, thats the governments job.

the problem isnt resources, the problem is not enough is done to recycle the resources we already have, glass, plastics, paper and wood products, etc. the problem isnt over crowding, its jamming too many people in too small an area. it isnt a lack of food either, its a matter of food not being distributed evenly. over crowding is a myth, its just poor handling of our resources, putting way too many people in too small an area and basically people being wasteful.

in a perfect world, all the food produced today would feed everyone on the planet, but politics and logistics prevents that. along with other factors im not going to go into (think zimbabwe and robert mugabe, it was south africa's bread basket, now its a charity case with inflation so bad you might as well wipe your ass with the currency)

i dont think the planet is overcrowded, its just we're mismanaging damn near everything we do on this planet and to this planet.

The problem isn't too many people or not enough food, it's the inequitable distribution of food.

Of course, that tends to keep population growth somewhat in check. Solve that problem and create another.