She seems like a retarded warmonger, but I might beh wrong. :(

I'm going to have to go with "Kinda Sleezy Lice, clone of E.T. the extra terrestrial, and ugliest, insane Neo-Con in history".

Forget her being an expert on anything other than being on her knees fumbling with Bush's zipper.

The most bovine eye's since "Bordon's Elsie the cow". ( And just as much a corporate shill.)

http://www.unconfirmedsources.com/nucleus/media/21/20070429-condishy.jpg

She's wearing that dress like an expert. I'll give her that.

She's an evil warmonger, I look forward to watching her trial at the ICC on my phone in the future!

I think she's kinda hot....

She seems like a retarded warmonger, but I might beh wrong. :(

I might consider doing her...

...but she is clueless when it comes to foreign policy.

I might consider doing her...

...but she is clueless when it comes to foreign policy.

She's equally clueless when it comes to national security, so her talents don't lend themselves to cerebral endeavors.

It's just a high stakes chess game folks. The dirty russian dogs made their move, and we made ours simple as that.

What I don't understand is how we can take ourselves seriously telling other people not to invade and occupy other countries.

6 years ago, sure. Now. WTF?

yeah, because the situations are synonymous

Condi.....condi......Hmmmm.... Isn't she the former head of our national security who, after dismally failing at her job and completely sitting out the event's of 9/11, was promoted to Sec. of State?

Yeah, that really inspires confidence.

Shades of "Good job Brownie".

yeah, because, you know, we all saw it coming.

yeah, because the situations are synonymous

it's worse, we attacked a country on the other side of the world that did nothing to us. Amazing how you rationalize bloodshed...

it's worse, we attacked a country on the other side of the world that did nothing to us. Amazing how you rationalize bloodshed...Yeah, because, you know, there never was anying such as UN resolutions or continued violations of them. Gee, Congress never even considered regeme change, they never even had a change to express their opinions concerning the use of force. And the world? why we didn't even consult them...we just went in alone. Poor ol' SH was just in the way of all our oil. Russia now, Russia has done it's best to broker peace, avoid violence, protect civilians, and consult the UN.

BTW what was it that Georgia did to Russia?


If you can't see the most obvious, glaring difference in the two situations then you are a bigger fool then we know you to be.

The US wants out of Iraq. Russia wants Georgia back

yeah, because the situations are synonymous


Non defensive invasion.


The US wants out of Iraq.


Then we ought to leave.

Or, are you saying that Iraq is a situation that can easily trap you so that you become involved with problems from which it is difficult to escape (http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=quagmire*1+0&dict=A)?

Non defensive invasion. You mean like every time the UN uses force???

Then we ought to leave.Gosh Obama-Wanna-Be, you're brilliant

Or, are you saying that Iraq is a situation that can easily trap you so that you become involved with problems from which it is difficult to escape (http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=quagmire*1+0&dict=A)?LOL...you still trying to peddle that quagmire shit?

LOL...you still trying to peddle that quagmire shit?

Isn't that what you're saying? If not, then we should leave.

Isn't that what you're saying? If not, then we should leave.No it's not what I implied and if you paid attention to current events , you'd notice we are discussing a plan to pull out. Or do you believe we should just pull stakes and exit? It sounds like taking the easy way out has been the lefts only solution since day 1

No it's not what I implied and if you paid attention to current events , you'd notice we are discussing a plan to pull out.


I know. A "surrender date".


Or do you believe we should just pull stakes and exit?


Why not? Is it a situation that can easily trap you so that you become involved with problems from which it is difficult to escape?


It sounds like taking the easy way out has been the lefts only solution since day 1

No, the smart people's plan was to just not invade Iraq, in the first place.

I know. A "surrender date". You are truly a fool.



Why not? Is it a situation that can easily trap you so that you become involved with problems from which it is difficult to escape?
yeah, yeah, yeah, quagmire, I've heard that BS from you guys many times over

No, the smart people's plan was to just not invade Iraq, in the first place.The smart people understand that we are in Iraq, and the two of us where discussing pulling out.

You are truly a fool.


If you're saying that calling a timetable for withdraw a "surrender date" is foolish, then we've finally agreed on something.


yeah, yeah, yeah, quagmire, I've heard that BS from you guys many times over

The smart people understand that we are in Iraq, and the two of us where discussing pulling out.

And you haven't explained why we can't pull out, if that's what we want, if Iraq isn't a situation that can easily trap you so that you become involved with problems from which it is difficult to escape?