Google
 

View Full Version : Tom Coburn - one of the good ones


hadit
08-18-2008, 12:07 PM
You know somebody's doing something right when the establishment is this riled at him. A pro-lifer puts his money where his mouth is by helping these women, and gets reprimanded. :nonono:

In June, the Senate Ethics Committee began an initial look into Dodd's and Conrad's discounted Countrywide Financial VIP loans, as is fitting. Meanwhile, with all of the ethics stinkbombs lurking in Washington, the committee, chaired by California Democrat Barbara Boxer, is aiming its guns at Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., for "a serious violation of Senate rules."

Coburn's bad? An obstetrician by profession, Coburn won't heed the committee's threat to reprimand him for delivering babies back home in Oklahoma - for free.

-snip-

When a member of the House, Coburn delivered 400 babies under an agreement with ethics meisters that allowed him to do so - if he charged only enough to cover his expenses.

When elected to the Senate, which was first run by Republicans and now Democrats, Ethics Committee members told Coburn that if he wants to treat patients - largely poor and "at risk" mothers - he could not charge them, and thus would have to eat the costs of his practice.

The Senate Ethics Committee allows big-buck book deals for U.S. senators, but in a May memorandum, it told Coburn "you are allowed to practice medicine if you provide such services for free." So he started working for nothing.

Even free wasn't good enough.


http://links.sfgate.com/c/a/2008/08/14/EDOD129KE2.DTL

soylentgreen
08-18-2008, 01:10 PM
That's retarded. Liberals are idiots.

Then again, they obviously mean to discourage the practice of helping poor/at risk mothers. Why would they do that? Hmmm...let me see...oh, yeah, I know... Because those women won't be as dependant on the government!! Can't have that...

cirque
08-18-2008, 11:13 PM
He should be allowed to work for free, at cost, or for profit. Where is the ethics violation in practicing medicine?

hadit
08-19-2008, 10:27 AM
He should be allowed to work for free, at cost, or for profit. Where is the ethics violation in practicing medicine?

The true motivation is to punish him for daring to challenge the pork. So much for the "greater openness" and "more ethical Congress" we were promised.

soylentgreen
08-19-2008, 01:07 PM
He should be allowed to work for free, at cost, or for profit. Where is the ethics violation in practicing medicine?I don't think there is one. However, I could see how it could be abused. For example...someone pays $20,000 to have a hangnail removed...but it's really a pay-off.

I don't see any issue whatsoever for giving free services.

Google