i actually saw this somewhere-but of course no way am i ever going to find it again-let's see if anyone examines the actual op instead of getting into the inevitable boring slug fest about whether homos are ok...

maybe. i'm heard dophines tend to homosexuality in some phases of their lives.

i heard that too somewhere..

maybe.
but I think homosexuality exists everywhere, not just in overpopulated parts of tehw rold.

maybe.
but I think homosexuality exists everywhere, not just in overpopulated parts of tehw rold.yea, homosexuality is only a phenomenon in nature as common as im not a homosexuality.

I think disease and famine are the primary ways in which nature deals with overpopulation.
Homosexuality might just be a way to make sure there is enough social support for the species in question. Meaning, I think it might be related to population but that it's purpose is not to control it.

It is natures way of ensuring some people have a rotten life.

I think disease and famine are the primary ways in which nature deals with overpopulation.

That's as in A.I.D.S.....

'Nuff said!

Nuclear warfare is nature's way of dealing with overpopulation.

That, and the inevitable expansion of the Sun, which will one day envelop the Earth.

I wish census data, including sexual preference, were available for before and after the Black Plague in Europe.
It's well known that birth rates went up after the plague. I also wonder if homosexuality decreased too.

It is natures way of ensuring some people have a rotten life.

i really agree but that's awfully non pc..

It is natures way of ensuring some people have a rotten life.

Hmmmm....they look pretty happy to me...

http://img396.imageshack.us/img396/4025/gayparade2003028qm7.jpg

wow is that the gay fitness club boat?

theyre delusional-they think theyre chix

the flesh and blood is a lapsus calami of the Creator. i heard this words somewhere.

Latin phrase meaning, a slip of the pen.
thx google-this young lady and her multilinguistic vocab *shakes head*

http://www.discussanything.com/forums/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=1548377

http://www.discussanything.com/forums/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=1548377
:mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad: :mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:

http://www.discussanything.com/forums/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=1548377


how'd you do that?

and why did you do that?

i actually saw this somewhere-but of course no way am i ever going to find it again-let's see if anyone examines the actual op instead of getting into the inevitable boring slug fest about whether homos are ok...

Here is one possibility: We become what we do. Homosexuality could be the result of it being practiced (when opposite sex was not available) over thousands of years. Traits transfer through reincarnation, positive and negative, depending on the life/s led previously. "The sins of the fathers shall be visited on the children," can be interpreted in many ways.

Also, a very interesting quote from the Gnostic Gospels. Jesus answered a question from one of His followers; "Before these things can happen, male must become female and female become male."
Parables were sometimes hard to decipher, intentionally I believe.

http://www.discussanything.com/forums/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=1548377


wwwwhat?????

wwwwhat?????sorry, wrong link...

theyre delusional-they think theyre chix

Eh? Bruce, that sounds almost Victorian. We have a large gay community and none of the men "think they are chicks"- they are simply attracted to other men.
Perhaps you are mixing them up with transgender, transvestites or cross-dressers?

The lovely Zippess went out with her girlfriends a few weeks back and after a meal and hitting a few bars they ended up in a gay bar run by friends. She tells me they had the greatest time, really enjoyed themselves (and didn't get hit on, by men or women!).

I know what the bible says but the bible is way open to interpretation.
It was written by men (who said it came from god), it was translated by men (who said it was literal even tho we know how involved the church has been in things that involve them and how especially in the old days they might have held some 'sway' over interpretation). All it takes is one guy with power, rich religious parents and a gay brother who he doesn't want to share with to affect what everyone is reading now.
The bible is not the word of god, it is the say-so of men. You better have a personal relationship with god, cause he's not going to appreciate you forming an opinion of him based on a friggin book when he's given you a spirit to be in touch with him with!

But if you follow the bible it tells you you are not your brother's keeper. It tells you 'let him without sin cast the first stone' it tells you a bunch of things thruout that say not to judge and condemn.
People ought to worry about their own souls and not anyone elses.

You'll get it when you're standing at the pearly gates and 2 men in front of you are holdihg each other, and you went in car wreck with your woman but she's pissesd at you and won't stand with you....

Eh? Bruce, that sounds almost Victorian. We have a large gay community and none of the men "think they are chicks"- they are simply attracted to other men.
Perhaps you are mixing them up with transgender, transvestites or cross-dressers?

The lovely Zippess went out with her girlfriends a few weeks back and after a meal and hitting a few bars they ended up in a gay bar run by friends. She tells me they had the greatest time, really enjoyed themselves (and didn't get hit on, by men or women!).

a lot of my thought is actually previctorian-im having a little mischeivous fun with this thread really-Austin has a large gay community and im friends with some very homosexual people...

a lot of my thought is actually previctorian-im having a little mischeivous fun with this thread really-Austin has a large gay community and im friends with some very homosexual people...


You BAD boy! That's the last time I lend you my mascara!

but your brand goes so well with my eye makeup...:(

i actually saw this somewhere-but of course no way am i ever going to find it again-let's see if anyone examines the actual op instead of getting into the inevitable boring slug fest about whether homos are ok...


Google "Generic adaptative syndrome".

Nture doesn't have anything to do with controlling overpopulation. Nature is all about life, and the continuation of all of the different species. That's obvious.

If overpopulation happens, and populations are thinned or die off due to shortages of food or resources, something else comes along to take the place.

Homosexuality has nothing to do with any of this. The numbers are way too low to have an impact. If 98% of humans, (or dolphins or whatever) are straight, does anyone actually believe the 2% that aren't have control over the population??? I think the whole question is ridiculous, because the answer is so obvious.

Homosexuality is lifeless, but it's the exception, not the rule.

Homosexuality might have nothing to do with population control. But, I would wager it does serve a purpose of some kind or it wouldn't exist in nature at this point.
It might be as simple as, one you hit a certain population threshold, you need a certain amount of the population to help support society rather than breed.

Google "Generic adaptative syndrome".

my pdf is uitfiggend-gimme the cliff's...